Cargando…

Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus

PURPOSE: This study evaluated a novel tool known as the motion diamond stimulus (MDS), which utilizes contrast-generated illusory motion in dynamic test regions to determine contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS: Patients with treated unilateral retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) underwent three assessment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Shubhendu, Maganti, Nenita, Squires, Natalie, Bomdica, Prithvi, Nigam, Divya, Shapiro, Arthur, Gill, Manjot K., Lyon, Alice T., Mirza, Rukhsana G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.29
_version_ 1783601669514199040
author Mishra, Shubhendu
Maganti, Nenita
Squires, Natalie
Bomdica, Prithvi
Nigam, Divya
Shapiro, Arthur
Gill, Manjot K.
Lyon, Alice T.
Mirza, Rukhsana G.
author_facet Mishra, Shubhendu
Maganti, Nenita
Squires, Natalie
Bomdica, Prithvi
Nigam, Divya
Shapiro, Arthur
Gill, Manjot K.
Lyon, Alice T.
Mirza, Rukhsana G.
author_sort Mishra, Shubhendu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated a novel tool known as the motion diamond stimulus (MDS), which utilizes contrast-generated illusory motion in dynamic test regions to determine contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS: Patients with treated unilateral retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) underwent three assessments: the MDS, the Pelli-Robson (PR), and the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). The MDS assessment produced two data end points, α and β. The α value represents the overall contrast threshold level and the β value serves to quantify the adaptability of the visual contrast system. The CS parameters from the MDS and log CS PR output values were used to compare RVO eyes (n = 20) to control eyes (n = 20). RESULTS: The study participants had a mean composite VFQ-25 score of 89.5 ± 10.4 on the VFQ-25. A significant difference was observed between the RVO eyes and the control eyes in PR log CS scores (P value = 0.0001) and in MDS α value (P value = 0.01). No difference in MDS β value was found between the study groups (P value = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The results for the MDS assessment's α parameter corroborated the PR scores, suggesting contrast sensitivity threshold impairment in patients with RVO. No significant difference in β value was observed, suggesting that adaptability of the visual system is maintained in treated RVO eyes. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Currently, visual complaints cannot be entirely identified by Snellen visual acuity alone. The MDS offers potentially a more complete look at visual function, by including contrast sensitivity and may be able to quantify changes otherwise overlooked in retinal disease progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75945802020-11-09 Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus Mishra, Shubhendu Maganti, Nenita Squires, Natalie Bomdica, Prithvi Nigam, Divya Shapiro, Arthur Gill, Manjot K. Lyon, Alice T. Mirza, Rukhsana G. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated a novel tool known as the motion diamond stimulus (MDS), which utilizes contrast-generated illusory motion in dynamic test regions to determine contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS: Patients with treated unilateral retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) underwent three assessments: the MDS, the Pelli-Robson (PR), and the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). The MDS assessment produced two data end points, α and β. The α value represents the overall contrast threshold level and the β value serves to quantify the adaptability of the visual contrast system. The CS parameters from the MDS and log CS PR output values were used to compare RVO eyes (n = 20) to control eyes (n = 20). RESULTS: The study participants had a mean composite VFQ-25 score of 89.5 ± 10.4 on the VFQ-25. A significant difference was observed between the RVO eyes and the control eyes in PR log CS scores (P value = 0.0001) and in MDS α value (P value = 0.01). No difference in MDS β value was found between the study groups (P value = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The results for the MDS assessment's α parameter corroborated the PR scores, suggesting contrast sensitivity threshold impairment in patients with RVO. No significant difference in β value was observed, suggesting that adaptability of the visual system is maintained in treated RVO eyes. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Currently, visual complaints cannot be entirely identified by Snellen visual acuity alone. The MDS offers potentially a more complete look at visual function, by including contrast sensitivity and may be able to quantify changes otherwise overlooked in retinal disease progression. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7594580/ /pubmed/33173608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.29 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Mishra, Shubhendu
Maganti, Nenita
Squires, Natalie
Bomdica, Prithvi
Nigam, Divya
Shapiro, Arthur
Gill, Manjot K.
Lyon, Alice T.
Mirza, Rukhsana G.
Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus
title Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus
title_full Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus
title_fullStr Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus
title_full_unstemmed Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus
title_short Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus
title_sort contrast sensitivity testing in retinal vein occlusion using a novel stimulus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.29
work_keys_str_mv AT mishrashubhendu contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT magantinenita contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT squiresnatalie contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT bomdicaprithvi contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT nigamdivya contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT shapiroarthur contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT gillmanjotk contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT lyonalicet contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus
AT mirzarukhsanag contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus