Cargando…
Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus
PURPOSE: This study evaluated a novel tool known as the motion diamond stimulus (MDS), which utilizes contrast-generated illusory motion in dynamic test regions to determine contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS: Patients with treated unilateral retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) underwent three assessment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.29 |
_version_ | 1783601669514199040 |
---|---|
author | Mishra, Shubhendu Maganti, Nenita Squires, Natalie Bomdica, Prithvi Nigam, Divya Shapiro, Arthur Gill, Manjot K. Lyon, Alice T. Mirza, Rukhsana G. |
author_facet | Mishra, Shubhendu Maganti, Nenita Squires, Natalie Bomdica, Prithvi Nigam, Divya Shapiro, Arthur Gill, Manjot K. Lyon, Alice T. Mirza, Rukhsana G. |
author_sort | Mishra, Shubhendu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study evaluated a novel tool known as the motion diamond stimulus (MDS), which utilizes contrast-generated illusory motion in dynamic test regions to determine contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS: Patients with treated unilateral retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) underwent three assessments: the MDS, the Pelli-Robson (PR), and the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). The MDS assessment produced two data end points, α and β. The α value represents the overall contrast threshold level and the β value serves to quantify the adaptability of the visual contrast system. The CS parameters from the MDS and log CS PR output values were used to compare RVO eyes (n = 20) to control eyes (n = 20). RESULTS: The study participants had a mean composite VFQ-25 score of 89.5 ± 10.4 on the VFQ-25. A significant difference was observed between the RVO eyes and the control eyes in PR log CS scores (P value = 0.0001) and in MDS α value (P value = 0.01). No difference in MDS β value was found between the study groups (P value = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The results for the MDS assessment's α parameter corroborated the PR scores, suggesting contrast sensitivity threshold impairment in patients with RVO. No significant difference in β value was observed, suggesting that adaptability of the visual system is maintained in treated RVO eyes. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Currently, visual complaints cannot be entirely identified by Snellen visual acuity alone. The MDS offers potentially a more complete look at visual function, by including contrast sensitivity and may be able to quantify changes otherwise overlooked in retinal disease progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7594580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75945802020-11-09 Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus Mishra, Shubhendu Maganti, Nenita Squires, Natalie Bomdica, Prithvi Nigam, Divya Shapiro, Arthur Gill, Manjot K. Lyon, Alice T. Mirza, Rukhsana G. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated a novel tool known as the motion diamond stimulus (MDS), which utilizes contrast-generated illusory motion in dynamic test regions to determine contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS: Patients with treated unilateral retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) underwent three assessments: the MDS, the Pelli-Robson (PR), and the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). The MDS assessment produced two data end points, α and β. The α value represents the overall contrast threshold level and the β value serves to quantify the adaptability of the visual contrast system. The CS parameters from the MDS and log CS PR output values were used to compare RVO eyes (n = 20) to control eyes (n = 20). RESULTS: The study participants had a mean composite VFQ-25 score of 89.5 ± 10.4 on the VFQ-25. A significant difference was observed between the RVO eyes and the control eyes in PR log CS scores (P value = 0.0001) and in MDS α value (P value = 0.01). No difference in MDS β value was found between the study groups (P value = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The results for the MDS assessment's α parameter corroborated the PR scores, suggesting contrast sensitivity threshold impairment in patients with RVO. No significant difference in β value was observed, suggesting that adaptability of the visual system is maintained in treated RVO eyes. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Currently, visual complaints cannot be entirely identified by Snellen visual acuity alone. The MDS offers potentially a more complete look at visual function, by including contrast sensitivity and may be able to quantify changes otherwise overlooked in retinal disease progression. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7594580/ /pubmed/33173608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.29 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Mishra, Shubhendu Maganti, Nenita Squires, Natalie Bomdica, Prithvi Nigam, Divya Shapiro, Arthur Gill, Manjot K. Lyon, Alice T. Mirza, Rukhsana G. Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus |
title | Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus |
title_full | Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus |
title_fullStr | Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus |
title_short | Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus |
title_sort | contrast sensitivity testing in retinal vein occlusion using a novel stimulus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mishrashubhendu contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT magantinenita contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT squiresnatalie contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT bomdicaprithvi contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT nigamdivya contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT shapiroarthur contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT gillmanjotk contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT lyonalicet contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus AT mirzarukhsanag contrastsensitivitytestinginretinalveinocclusionusinganovelstimulus |