Cargando…

Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management

Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roversi, Chiara, Vettoretti, Martina, Del Favero, Simone, Facchinetti, Andrea, Sparacino, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32223551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0502
_version_ 1783601688506007552
author Roversi, Chiara
Vettoretti, Martina
Del Favero, Simone
Facchinetti, Andrea
Sparacino, Giovanni
author_facet Roversi, Chiara
Vettoretti, Martina
Del Favero, Simone
Facchinetti, Andrea
Sparacino, Giovanni
author_sort Roversi, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of CHO counting error embeddable in T1D patient decision simulators to conduct in silico clinical trials. Methods: A published dataset of 50 T1D adults is used, which includes a patient's CHO count of 692 meals, dietitian's estimates of meal composition (used as reference), and several potential explanatory factors. The CHO counting error is modeled by multiple linear regression, with stepwise variable selection starting from 10 candidate predictors, that is, education level, insulin treatment duration, age, body weight, meal type, CHO, lipid, energy, protein, and fiber content. Inclusion of quadratic and interaction terms is also evaluated. Results: Larger errors correspond to larger meals, and most of the large meals are underestimated. The linear model selects CHO (P < 0.00001), meal type (P < 0.00001), and body weight (P = 0.047), whereas its extended version embeds a quadratic term of CHO (P < 0.00001) and interaction terms of meal type with CHO (P = 0.0001) and fiber amount (P = 0.001). The extended model explains 34.9% of the CHO counting error variance. Comparison with the CHO counting error description previously used in the T1D patient decision simulator shows that the proposed models return more credible realizations. Conclusions: The most important predictors of CHO counting errors are CHO and meal type. The mathematical models proposed improve the description of patients' behavior in the T1D patient decision simulator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75947102020-10-29 Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management Roversi, Chiara Vettoretti, Martina Del Favero, Simone Facchinetti, Andrea Sparacino, Giovanni Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of CHO counting error embeddable in T1D patient decision simulators to conduct in silico clinical trials. Methods: A published dataset of 50 T1D adults is used, which includes a patient's CHO count of 692 meals, dietitian's estimates of meal composition (used as reference), and several potential explanatory factors. The CHO counting error is modeled by multiple linear regression, with stepwise variable selection starting from 10 candidate predictors, that is, education level, insulin treatment duration, age, body weight, meal type, CHO, lipid, energy, protein, and fiber content. Inclusion of quadratic and interaction terms is also evaluated. Results: Larger errors correspond to larger meals, and most of the large meals are underestimated. The linear model selects CHO (P < 0.00001), meal type (P < 0.00001), and body weight (P = 0.047), whereas its extended version embeds a quadratic term of CHO (P < 0.00001) and interaction terms of meal type with CHO (P = 0.0001) and fiber amount (P = 0.001). The extended model explains 34.9% of the CHO counting error variance. Comparison with the CHO counting error description previously used in the T1D patient decision simulator shows that the proposed models return more credible realizations. Conclusions: The most important predictors of CHO counting errors are CHO and meal type. The mathematical models proposed improve the description of patients' behavior in the T1D patient decision simulator. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-10-01 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7594710/ /pubmed/32223551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0502 Text en © Chiara Roversi, et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Roversi, Chiara
Vettoretti, Martina
Del Favero, Simone
Facchinetti, Andrea
Sparacino, Giovanni
Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
title Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
title_full Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
title_fullStr Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
title_short Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
title_sort modeling carbohydrate counting error in type 1 diabetes management
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32223551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0502
work_keys_str_mv AT roversichiara modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement
AT vettorettimartina modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement
AT delfaverosimone modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement
AT facchinettiandrea modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement
AT sparacinogiovanni modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement