Cargando…
Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32223551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0502 |
_version_ | 1783601688506007552 |
---|---|
author | Roversi, Chiara Vettoretti, Martina Del Favero, Simone Facchinetti, Andrea Sparacino, Giovanni |
author_facet | Roversi, Chiara Vettoretti, Martina Del Favero, Simone Facchinetti, Andrea Sparacino, Giovanni |
author_sort | Roversi, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of CHO counting error embeddable in T1D patient decision simulators to conduct in silico clinical trials. Methods: A published dataset of 50 T1D adults is used, which includes a patient's CHO count of 692 meals, dietitian's estimates of meal composition (used as reference), and several potential explanatory factors. The CHO counting error is modeled by multiple linear regression, with stepwise variable selection starting from 10 candidate predictors, that is, education level, insulin treatment duration, age, body weight, meal type, CHO, lipid, energy, protein, and fiber content. Inclusion of quadratic and interaction terms is also evaluated. Results: Larger errors correspond to larger meals, and most of the large meals are underestimated. The linear model selects CHO (P < 0.00001), meal type (P < 0.00001), and body weight (P = 0.047), whereas its extended version embeds a quadratic term of CHO (P < 0.00001) and interaction terms of meal type with CHO (P = 0.0001) and fiber amount (P = 0.001). The extended model explains 34.9% of the CHO counting error variance. Comparison with the CHO counting error description previously used in the T1D patient decision simulator shows that the proposed models return more credible realizations. Conclusions: The most important predictors of CHO counting errors are CHO and meal type. The mathematical models proposed improve the description of patients' behavior in the T1D patient decision simulator. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7594710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75947102020-10-29 Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management Roversi, Chiara Vettoretti, Martina Del Favero, Simone Facchinetti, Andrea Sparacino, Giovanni Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of CHO counting error embeddable in T1D patient decision simulators to conduct in silico clinical trials. Methods: A published dataset of 50 T1D adults is used, which includes a patient's CHO count of 692 meals, dietitian's estimates of meal composition (used as reference), and several potential explanatory factors. The CHO counting error is modeled by multiple linear regression, with stepwise variable selection starting from 10 candidate predictors, that is, education level, insulin treatment duration, age, body weight, meal type, CHO, lipid, energy, protein, and fiber content. Inclusion of quadratic and interaction terms is also evaluated. Results: Larger errors correspond to larger meals, and most of the large meals are underestimated. The linear model selects CHO (P < 0.00001), meal type (P < 0.00001), and body weight (P = 0.047), whereas its extended version embeds a quadratic term of CHO (P < 0.00001) and interaction terms of meal type with CHO (P = 0.0001) and fiber amount (P = 0.001). The extended model explains 34.9% of the CHO counting error variance. Comparison with the CHO counting error description previously used in the T1D patient decision simulator shows that the proposed models return more credible realizations. Conclusions: The most important predictors of CHO counting errors are CHO and meal type. The mathematical models proposed improve the description of patients' behavior in the T1D patient decision simulator. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-10-01 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7594710/ /pubmed/32223551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0502 Text en © Chiara Roversi, et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Roversi, Chiara Vettoretti, Martina Del Favero, Simone Facchinetti, Andrea Sparacino, Giovanni Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management |
title | Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management |
title_full | Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management |
title_fullStr | Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management |
title_short | Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management |
title_sort | modeling carbohydrate counting error in type 1 diabetes management |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32223551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roversichiara modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement AT vettorettimartina modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement AT delfaverosimone modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement AT facchinettiandrea modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement AT sparacinogiovanni modelingcarbohydratecountingerrorintype1diabetesmanagement |