Cargando…

A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States

OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread cervical screening, an estimated 13,800 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States in 2020. To inform improvements, the screening histories of women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New Mexico were assessed. METHODS: Data were collected on all ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landy, Rebecca, Mathews, Christopher, Robertson, Michael, Wiggins, Charles L., McDonald, Yolanda J., Goldberg, Daniel W., Scarinci, Isabel C., Cuzick, Jack, Sasieni, Peter D., Wheeler, Cosette M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.033
_version_ 1783601728339312640
author Landy, Rebecca
Mathews, Christopher
Robertson, Michael
Wiggins, Charles L.
McDonald, Yolanda J.
Goldberg, Daniel W.
Scarinci, Isabel C.
Cuzick, Jack
Sasieni, Peter D.
Wheeler, Cosette M.
author_facet Landy, Rebecca
Mathews, Christopher
Robertson, Michael
Wiggins, Charles L.
McDonald, Yolanda J.
Goldberg, Daniel W.
Scarinci, Isabel C.
Cuzick, Jack
Sasieni, Peter D.
Wheeler, Cosette M.
author_sort Landy, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread cervical screening, an estimated 13,800 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States in 2020. To inform improvements, the screening histories of women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New Mexico were assessed. METHODS: Data were collected on all cervical screening, diagnostic tests and treatment procedures for all women diagnosed with cervical cancer aged 25-64 yrs. in New Mexico from 2006 to 2016. Women were categorized by their screening attendance in the 5–40 months (screening interval) and 1–4 months (peri-diagnostic interval) prior to cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 504 women diagnosed between May 2009–December 2016, 64% were not screened or had only inadequate screening tests in the 5–40 months prior to diagnosis, and 90 of 182 screened women (49%) had only negative screens in this period. Only 32% (N = 162) of cervical cancers were screen-detected. Women with adenocarcinomas were more likely to have had a recent negative screen (41/57 = 722%) than women with squamous cancers (50/112 = 45%). Both older women (aged 45–64 years) and women with more advanced cancers were less likely to have been screened, and if screened, were more likely to have a false-negative outcome. Only 9% of cancers were diagnosed in women who did not attend biopsy or treatment after positive tests requiring clinical management. Screening currently prevents 35% of cancers, whereas full screening coverage could prevent 61% of cervical cancers. CONCLUSION: Improved screening coverage has the largest potential for reducing cervical cancer incidence, though there is also a role for improved recall procedures and screening sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75949312020-11-02 A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States Landy, Rebecca Mathews, Christopher Robertson, Michael Wiggins, Charles L. McDonald, Yolanda J. Goldberg, Daniel W. Scarinci, Isabel C. Cuzick, Jack Sasieni, Peter D. Wheeler, Cosette M. Gynecol Oncol Article OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread cervical screening, an estimated 13,800 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States in 2020. To inform improvements, the screening histories of women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New Mexico were assessed. METHODS: Data were collected on all cervical screening, diagnostic tests and treatment procedures for all women diagnosed with cervical cancer aged 25-64 yrs. in New Mexico from 2006 to 2016. Women were categorized by their screening attendance in the 5–40 months (screening interval) and 1–4 months (peri-diagnostic interval) prior to cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 504 women diagnosed between May 2009–December 2016, 64% were not screened or had only inadequate screening tests in the 5–40 months prior to diagnosis, and 90 of 182 screened women (49%) had only negative screens in this period. Only 32% (N = 162) of cervical cancers were screen-detected. Women with adenocarcinomas were more likely to have had a recent negative screen (41/57 = 722%) than women with squamous cancers (50/112 = 45%). Both older women (aged 45–64 years) and women with more advanced cancers were less likely to have been screened, and if screened, were more likely to have a false-negative outcome. Only 9% of cancers were diagnosed in women who did not attend biopsy or treatment after positive tests requiring clinical management. Screening currently prevents 35% of cancers, whereas full screening coverage could prevent 61% of cervical cancers. CONCLUSION: Improved screening coverage has the largest potential for reducing cervical cancer incidence, though there is also a role for improved recall procedures and screening sensitivity. Academic Press 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7594931/ /pubmed/32977987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.033 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Landy, Rebecca
Mathews, Christopher
Robertson, Michael
Wiggins, Charles L.
McDonald, Yolanda J.
Goldberg, Daniel W.
Scarinci, Isabel C.
Cuzick, Jack
Sasieni, Peter D.
Wheeler, Cosette M.
A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States
title A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States
title_full A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States
title_fullStr A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States
title_full_unstemmed A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States
title_short A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States
title_sort state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the united states
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.033
work_keys_str_mv AT landyrebecca astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT mathewschristopher astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT robertsonmichael astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT wigginscharlesl astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT mcdonaldyolandaj astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT goldbergdanielw astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT scarinciisabelc astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT cuzickjack astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT sasienipeterd astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT wheelercosettem astatewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT landyrebecca statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT mathewschristopher statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT robertsonmichael statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT wigginscharlesl statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT mcdonaldyolandaj statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT goldbergdanielw statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT scarinciisabelc statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT cuzickjack statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT sasienipeterd statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates
AT wheelercosettem statewidepopulationbasedevaluationofcervicalcancersarisingduringopportunisticscreeningintheunitedstates