Cargando…

Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic

The 2019–2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous crimina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Smith, Steven R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2
_version_ 1783601772849266688
author Smith, Steven R.
author_facet Smith, Steven R.
author_sort Smith, Steven R.
collection PubMed
description The 2019–2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous criminal jury decisions were ruled a required condition for conviction. The rescindment of DACA was overturned on procedural grounds. Other decisions related to conditions of abortion, habitual residence in international custody cases, police immunity from civil liability, guns, HIV, and capital punishment. Thirty-five percent of cases were unanimous (down from the recent average), and 22% were decided by a 5–4 vote (slightly above the recent average).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7595055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75950552020-10-30 Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic Smith, Steven R. J Health Serv Psychol Article The 2019–2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous criminal jury decisions were ruled a required condition for conviction. The rescindment of DACA was overturned on procedural grounds. Other decisions related to conditions of abortion, habitual residence in international custody cases, police immunity from civil liability, guns, HIV, and capital punishment. Thirty-five percent of cases were unanimous (down from the recent average), and 22% were decided by a 5–4 vote (slightly above the recent average). Springer International Publishing 2020-10-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7595055/ /pubmed/33145496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2 Text en © National Register of Health Service Psychologists 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Steven R.
Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
title Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
title_full Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
title_fullStr Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
title_short Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
title_sort supreme court 2019–2020: insanity, discrimination, and daca—and a pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2
work_keys_str_mv AT smithstevenr supremecourt20192020insanitydiscriminationanddacaandapandemic