Cargando…
Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
The 2019–2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous crimina...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2 |
_version_ | 1783601772849266688 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Steven R. |
author_facet | Smith, Steven R. |
author_sort | Smith, Steven R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 2019–2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous criminal jury decisions were ruled a required condition for conviction. The rescindment of DACA was overturned on procedural grounds. Other decisions related to conditions of abortion, habitual residence in international custody cases, police immunity from civil liability, guns, HIV, and capital punishment. Thirty-five percent of cases were unanimous (down from the recent average), and 22% were decided by a 5–4 vote (slightly above the recent average). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7595055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75950552020-10-30 Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic Smith, Steven R. J Health Serv Psychol Article The 2019–2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous criminal jury decisions were ruled a required condition for conviction. The rescindment of DACA was overturned on procedural grounds. Other decisions related to conditions of abortion, habitual residence in international custody cases, police immunity from civil liability, guns, HIV, and capital punishment. Thirty-five percent of cases were unanimous (down from the recent average), and 22% were decided by a 5–4 vote (slightly above the recent average). Springer International Publishing 2020-10-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7595055/ /pubmed/33145496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2 Text en © National Register of Health Service Psychologists 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Smith, Steven R. Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic |
title | Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic |
title_full | Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic |
title_short | Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic |
title_sort | supreme court 2019–2020: insanity, discrimination, and daca—and a pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithstevenr supremecourt20192020insanitydiscriminationanddacaandapandemic |