Cargando…

Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids

We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong, Janelle, Alonso-Caneiro, David, Yoshioka, Nayuta, Kalloniatis, Michael, Zangerl, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75599-0
_version_ 1783601793642528768
author Tong, Janelle
Alonso-Caneiro, David
Yoshioka, Nayuta
Kalloniatis, Michael
Zangerl, Barbara
author_facet Tong, Janelle
Alonso-Caneiro, David
Yoshioka, Nayuta
Kalloniatis, Michael
Zangerl, Barbara
author_sort Tong, Janelle
collection PubMed
description We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GCIPL thickness measurements from locations corresponding to Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 and 30-2 test grids over Goldmann II, III and V stimulus sizes from a healthy cohort of 478 participants. Differences between GCIPL thickness measurements based on VF test grids (VF-based paradigms) and the 8 × 8 grid, as per instrument review software, were analyzed, as were impacts of fovea to optic disc tilt and areas over which GCIPL thickness measurements were extracted. Significant differences between the VF-based paradigms and the 8 × 8 grid were observed at up to 55% of locations across the macula, with the greatest deviations at the fovea (median 25.5 μm, 95% CI 25.24–25.72 μm, P < .0001). While significant correlations with fovea to optic disc tilt were noted at up to 33% of locations distributed 6°–8° from the foveal center, there were no marked differences in GCIPL thickness measurements between VF-based paradigms using different stimulus sizes. As such, standard high-density OCT measurement paradigms do not adequately reflect GCIPL measurements at retinal locations tested with standard VF patterns, with the central macular region contributing most to the observed differences and with further correction required for fovea to optic disc tilt. Spatial direction of GCIPL thickness measurements will improve future comparisons of structure and function, thereby improving methods designed to detect pathology affecting the inner retina.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7595126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75951262020-10-29 Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids Tong, Janelle Alonso-Caneiro, David Yoshioka, Nayuta Kalloniatis, Michael Zangerl, Barbara Sci Rep Article We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GCIPL thickness measurements from locations corresponding to Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 and 30-2 test grids over Goldmann II, III and V stimulus sizes from a healthy cohort of 478 participants. Differences between GCIPL thickness measurements based on VF test grids (VF-based paradigms) and the 8 × 8 grid, as per instrument review software, were analyzed, as were impacts of fovea to optic disc tilt and areas over which GCIPL thickness measurements were extracted. Significant differences between the VF-based paradigms and the 8 × 8 grid were observed at up to 55% of locations across the macula, with the greatest deviations at the fovea (median 25.5 μm, 95% CI 25.24–25.72 μm, P < .0001). While significant correlations with fovea to optic disc tilt were noted at up to 33% of locations distributed 6°–8° from the foveal center, there were no marked differences in GCIPL thickness measurements between VF-based paradigms using different stimulus sizes. As such, standard high-density OCT measurement paradigms do not adequately reflect GCIPL measurements at retinal locations tested with standard VF patterns, with the central macular region contributing most to the observed differences and with further correction required for fovea to optic disc tilt. Spatial direction of GCIPL thickness measurements will improve future comparisons of structure and function, thereby improving methods designed to detect pathology affecting the inner retina. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7595126/ /pubmed/33116253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75599-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tong, Janelle
Alonso-Caneiro, David
Yoshioka, Nayuta
Kalloniatis, Michael
Zangerl, Barbara
Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
title Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
title_full Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
title_fullStr Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
title_full_unstemmed Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
title_short Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
title_sort custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75599-0
work_keys_str_mv AT tongjanelle customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids
AT alonsocaneirodavid customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids
AT yoshiokanayuta customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids
AT kalloniatismichael customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids
AT zangerlbarbara customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids