Cargando…
Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids
We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GC...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75599-0 |
_version_ | 1783601793642528768 |
---|---|
author | Tong, Janelle Alonso-Caneiro, David Yoshioka, Nayuta Kalloniatis, Michael Zangerl, Barbara |
author_facet | Tong, Janelle Alonso-Caneiro, David Yoshioka, Nayuta Kalloniatis, Michael Zangerl, Barbara |
author_sort | Tong, Janelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GCIPL thickness measurements from locations corresponding to Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 and 30-2 test grids over Goldmann II, III and V stimulus sizes from a healthy cohort of 478 participants. Differences between GCIPL thickness measurements based on VF test grids (VF-based paradigms) and the 8 × 8 grid, as per instrument review software, were analyzed, as were impacts of fovea to optic disc tilt and areas over which GCIPL thickness measurements were extracted. Significant differences between the VF-based paradigms and the 8 × 8 grid were observed at up to 55% of locations across the macula, with the greatest deviations at the fovea (median 25.5 μm, 95% CI 25.24–25.72 μm, P < .0001). While significant correlations with fovea to optic disc tilt were noted at up to 33% of locations distributed 6°–8° from the foveal center, there were no marked differences in GCIPL thickness measurements between VF-based paradigms using different stimulus sizes. As such, standard high-density OCT measurement paradigms do not adequately reflect GCIPL measurements at retinal locations tested with standard VF patterns, with the central macular region contributing most to the observed differences and with further correction required for fovea to optic disc tilt. Spatial direction of GCIPL thickness measurements will improve future comparisons of structure and function, thereby improving methods designed to detect pathology affecting the inner retina. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7595126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75951262020-10-29 Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids Tong, Janelle Alonso-Caneiro, David Yoshioka, Nayuta Kalloniatis, Michael Zangerl, Barbara Sci Rep Article We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GCIPL thickness measurements from locations corresponding to Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 and 30-2 test grids over Goldmann II, III and V stimulus sizes from a healthy cohort of 478 participants. Differences between GCIPL thickness measurements based on VF test grids (VF-based paradigms) and the 8 × 8 grid, as per instrument review software, were analyzed, as were impacts of fovea to optic disc tilt and areas over which GCIPL thickness measurements were extracted. Significant differences between the VF-based paradigms and the 8 × 8 grid were observed at up to 55% of locations across the macula, with the greatest deviations at the fovea (median 25.5 μm, 95% CI 25.24–25.72 μm, P < .0001). While significant correlations with fovea to optic disc tilt were noted at up to 33% of locations distributed 6°–8° from the foveal center, there were no marked differences in GCIPL thickness measurements between VF-based paradigms using different stimulus sizes. As such, standard high-density OCT measurement paradigms do not adequately reflect GCIPL measurements at retinal locations tested with standard VF patterns, with the central macular region contributing most to the observed differences and with further correction required for fovea to optic disc tilt. Spatial direction of GCIPL thickness measurements will improve future comparisons of structure and function, thereby improving methods designed to detect pathology affecting the inner retina. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7595126/ /pubmed/33116253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75599-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tong, Janelle Alonso-Caneiro, David Yoshioka, Nayuta Kalloniatis, Michael Zangerl, Barbara Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids |
title | Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids |
title_full | Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids |
title_fullStr | Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids |
title_full_unstemmed | Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids |
title_short | Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids |
title_sort | custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75599-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tongjanelle customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids AT alonsocaneirodavid customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids AT yoshiokanayuta customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids AT kalloniatismichael customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids AT zangerlbarbara customextractionofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessmorepreciselycolocalizesstructuralmeasurementswithvisualfieldstestgrids |