Cargando…

Test–retest reliability of the 20-min pad test with infusion of strong-desired volume in the bladder for female urodynamic stress incontinence

The repeatability of the 20-min pad test has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the 20-min pad test in women with urodynamic stress incontinence. Among 89 enrolled women, 67 (75%) women were diagnosed with urodynamic stress incontinence and were e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Wen-Yih, Hsiao, Sheng-Mou, Wu, Pei-Chi, Lin, Ho-Hsiung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75567-8
Descripción
Sumario:The repeatability of the 20-min pad test has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the 20-min pad test in women with urodynamic stress incontinence. Among 89 enrolled women, 67 (75%) women were diagnosed with urodynamic stress incontinence and were examined in this study. The mean strong-desire volume of all the women was 306.7 ± 115.7 mL. The pad weights of the test versus retest were 28.3 ± 41.2 g versus 28.4 ± 38.6 g, p = 0.29, respectively. The test and retest pad weight results had a Spearman’s rho of 0.788 (p < 0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.793 (95% confidence interval, 0.704–0.882; p < 0.0001). The Bland–Altman plots all revealed good agreement between the test and the retest in the pad weights. In conclusion, the 20-min pad test infused with a strong-desired volume has good test–retest reliability to assess the severity of urine leakage for women with urodynamic stress incontinence.