Cargando…

Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission

An estimated 105 million dengue infections occur per year across 120 countries, where traditional vector control is the primary control strategy to reduce contact between mosquito vectors and people. The ongoing sars-cov-2 pandemic has resulted in dramatic reductions in human mobility due to social...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Jue Tao, Dickens, Borame Sue Lee, Chew, Lawrence Zheng Xiong, Choo, Esther Li Wen, Koo, Joel Ruihan, Aik, Joel, Ng, Lee Ching, Cook, Alex R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33119609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008719
_version_ 1783601835170332672
author Lim, Jue Tao
Dickens, Borame Sue Lee
Chew, Lawrence Zheng Xiong
Choo, Esther Li Wen
Koo, Joel Ruihan
Aik, Joel
Ng, Lee Ching
Cook, Alex R.
author_facet Lim, Jue Tao
Dickens, Borame Sue Lee
Chew, Lawrence Zheng Xiong
Choo, Esther Li Wen
Koo, Joel Ruihan
Aik, Joel
Ng, Lee Ching
Cook, Alex R.
author_sort Lim, Jue Tao
collection PubMed
description An estimated 105 million dengue infections occur per year across 120 countries, where traditional vector control is the primary control strategy to reduce contact between mosquito vectors and people. The ongoing sars-cov-2 pandemic has resulted in dramatic reductions in human mobility due to social distancing measures; the effects on vector-borne illnesses are not known. Here we examine the pre and post differences of dengue case counts in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, and estimate the effects of social distancing as a treatment effect whilst adjusting for temporal confounders. We found that social distancing is expected to lead to 4.32 additional cases per 100,000 individuals in Thailand per month, which equates to 170 more cases per month in the Bangkok province (95% CI: 100–242) and 2008 cases in the country as a whole (95% CI: 1170–2846). Social distancing policy estimates for Thailand were also found to be robust to model misspecification, and variable addition and omission. Conversely, no significant impact on dengue transmission was found in Singapore or Malaysia. Across country disparities in social distancing policy effects on reported dengue cases are reasoned to be driven by differences in workplace-residence structure, with an increase in transmission risk of arboviruses from social distancing primarily through heightened exposure to vectors in elevated time spent at residences, demonstrating the need to understand the effects of location on dengue transmission risk under novel population mixing conditions such as those under social distancing policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7595279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75952792020-11-02 Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission Lim, Jue Tao Dickens, Borame Sue Lee Chew, Lawrence Zheng Xiong Choo, Esther Li Wen Koo, Joel Ruihan Aik, Joel Ng, Lee Ching Cook, Alex R. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article An estimated 105 million dengue infections occur per year across 120 countries, where traditional vector control is the primary control strategy to reduce contact between mosquito vectors and people. The ongoing sars-cov-2 pandemic has resulted in dramatic reductions in human mobility due to social distancing measures; the effects on vector-borne illnesses are not known. Here we examine the pre and post differences of dengue case counts in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, and estimate the effects of social distancing as a treatment effect whilst adjusting for temporal confounders. We found that social distancing is expected to lead to 4.32 additional cases per 100,000 individuals in Thailand per month, which equates to 170 more cases per month in the Bangkok province (95% CI: 100–242) and 2008 cases in the country as a whole (95% CI: 1170–2846). Social distancing policy estimates for Thailand were also found to be robust to model misspecification, and variable addition and omission. Conversely, no significant impact on dengue transmission was found in Singapore or Malaysia. Across country disparities in social distancing policy effects on reported dengue cases are reasoned to be driven by differences in workplace-residence structure, with an increase in transmission risk of arboviruses from social distancing primarily through heightened exposure to vectors in elevated time spent at residences, demonstrating the need to understand the effects of location on dengue transmission risk under novel population mixing conditions such as those under social distancing policies. Public Library of Science 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7595279/ /pubmed/33119609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008719 Text en © 2020 Lim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lim, Jue Tao
Dickens, Borame Sue Lee
Chew, Lawrence Zheng Xiong
Choo, Esther Li Wen
Koo, Joel Ruihan
Aik, Joel
Ng, Lee Ching
Cook, Alex R.
Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission
title Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission
title_full Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission
title_fullStr Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission
title_full_unstemmed Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission
title_short Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission
title_sort impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33119609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008719
work_keys_str_mv AT limjuetao impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission
AT dickensboramesuelee impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission
AT chewlawrencezhengxiong impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission
AT chooestherliwen impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission
AT koojoelruihan impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission
AT aikjoel impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission
AT ngleeching impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission
AT cookalexr impactofsarscov2interventionsondenguetransmission