Cargando…

Estimation of Red-complex Bacteria in Diode Laser Treated Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Clinical and Microbiological Study

CONTEXT: Laser has been widely accepted as a substitute to traditional periodontal treatment. Only a finite number of studies are available based on the use of diode laser as a supplement to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the reduction of red-complex bacteria. AIM: This split-mouth study was aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahalakshmi, M Rangaiah, Leela, Ravishankar P, Yadalam, Pradeep K, Rajula, Prem Blaisie, Vadivelu, Saravanan A, Malakar, V Maharshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149445
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_45_20
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Laser has been widely accepted as a substitute to traditional periodontal treatment. Only a finite number of studies are available based on the use of diode laser as a supplement to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the reduction of red-complex bacteria. AIM: This split-mouth study was aimed to determine the clinical and microbiological effects of diode laser as a supplement to SRP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this split-mouth study, systemically healthy 34 patients with chronic periodontitis were selected. In the test quadrant, SRP + laser therapy was carried out, whereas in control quadrants, SRP alone was performed. Clinical and microbiological data were acquired at baseline and 3 months postoperative, and statistical analysis was carried out on the findings. RESULTS: The results showed that both the treatment modalities were impelling. Considerable reduction in the mean probing depth and a notable improvement in the attachment level were observed in both groups in comparison to baseline, with a statistically significant reduction in the laser group. Microbiological analysis results showed more reduction in red-complex bacteria in the laser group compared to the SRP group, but they were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, it is recommended that both the SRP and SRP + laser are effective in chronic periodontitis management, but using laser with SRP has propitious results. Thus, in the forthcoming years, clinical experiments with a greater sample size may be chosen to further analyze the fringe benefits of laser as a supplement to SRP.