Cargando…
Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is a cornerstone of control of parasitic helminths. In schistosomiasis-endemic areas with >50% of school-aged children infected, community-wide MDA with praziquantel is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), with target coverage of >75%....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33075067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008718 |
_version_ | 1783601915755495424 |
---|---|
author | Akurut, Hellen Sanya, Richard E. Lubyayi, Lawrence Nampijja, Margaret Kizza, Moses Kaweesa, James Kizindo, Robert Sewankambo, Moses Nsubuga, Denis Tukahebwa, Edridah Kabatereine, Narcis B. Elliott, Alison M. Webb, Emily L. |
author_facet | Akurut, Hellen Sanya, Richard E. Lubyayi, Lawrence Nampijja, Margaret Kizza, Moses Kaweesa, James Kizindo, Robert Sewankambo, Moses Nsubuga, Denis Tukahebwa, Edridah Kabatereine, Narcis B. Elliott, Alison M. Webb, Emily L. |
author_sort | Akurut, Hellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is a cornerstone of control of parasitic helminths. In schistosomiasis-endemic areas with >50% of school-aged children infected, community-wide MDA with praziquantel is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), with target coverage of >75%. Using data from a cluster-randomised trial of MDA treatment strategies, we aimed to describe the proportion of eligible residents who received MDA and predictors of treatment receipt, and to assess associations with helminth prevalence. METHODS: In the Koome islands of Lake Victoria, Uganda, where baseline schistosomiasis prevalence (by single stool sample, Kato Katz) was 52% overall (all ages) and 67% among school-aged children, we conducted a cluster-randomised trial of community-wide, intensive MDA (quarterly single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; triple-dose albendazole 400mg) versus standard, Uganda government intervention (annual single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; 6-monthly single-dose albendazole). Twenty-six fishing villages were randomised, 13 per trial arm, for four years. At each treatment round, praziquantel treatment and the first dose of albendazole treatment were directly observed by the study team, registers of village residents were updated and the proportion receiving treatment among those eligible recorded. RESULTS: During the four-year MDA, at each treatment round an average of 13,382 people were registered in the 26 villages (7,153 and 6,229 in standard and intensive intervention villages, respectively). Overall, the proportion of those eligible receiving praziquantel was lower than for albendazole (60% versus 65%), particularly in the standard arm (61% versus 71%) compared to the intensive arm (60% versus 62%). Albendazole receipt was lower when given concurrently with praziquantel. Absence was the commonest reason for non-receipt of treatment (81% albendazole, 77% praziquantel), followed by refusal (14% albendazole, 18% praziquantel). Proportions receiving treatment were lowest among school-aged children, but did not differ by sex. Longitudinal analysis of a subgroup of residents who did not move during the study period found that persistent non-receipt of treatment in this subgroup was rare. Refusal to receive treatment was highest among adults and more common among females. CONCLUSION: In schistosomiasis high-risk communities, a combination of approaches to increasing treatment coverage, such as extended periods of treatment delivery, and the provision of incentives, may be required to achieve WHO targets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7595614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75956142020-11-03 Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial Akurut, Hellen Sanya, Richard E. Lubyayi, Lawrence Nampijja, Margaret Kizza, Moses Kaweesa, James Kizindo, Robert Sewankambo, Moses Nsubuga, Denis Tukahebwa, Edridah Kabatereine, Narcis B. Elliott, Alison M. Webb, Emily L. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is a cornerstone of control of parasitic helminths. In schistosomiasis-endemic areas with >50% of school-aged children infected, community-wide MDA with praziquantel is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), with target coverage of >75%. Using data from a cluster-randomised trial of MDA treatment strategies, we aimed to describe the proportion of eligible residents who received MDA and predictors of treatment receipt, and to assess associations with helminth prevalence. METHODS: In the Koome islands of Lake Victoria, Uganda, where baseline schistosomiasis prevalence (by single stool sample, Kato Katz) was 52% overall (all ages) and 67% among school-aged children, we conducted a cluster-randomised trial of community-wide, intensive MDA (quarterly single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; triple-dose albendazole 400mg) versus standard, Uganda government intervention (annual single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; 6-monthly single-dose albendazole). Twenty-six fishing villages were randomised, 13 per trial arm, for four years. At each treatment round, praziquantel treatment and the first dose of albendazole treatment were directly observed by the study team, registers of village residents were updated and the proportion receiving treatment among those eligible recorded. RESULTS: During the four-year MDA, at each treatment round an average of 13,382 people were registered in the 26 villages (7,153 and 6,229 in standard and intensive intervention villages, respectively). Overall, the proportion of those eligible receiving praziquantel was lower than for albendazole (60% versus 65%), particularly in the standard arm (61% versus 71%) compared to the intensive arm (60% versus 62%). Albendazole receipt was lower when given concurrently with praziquantel. Absence was the commonest reason for non-receipt of treatment (81% albendazole, 77% praziquantel), followed by refusal (14% albendazole, 18% praziquantel). Proportions receiving treatment were lowest among school-aged children, but did not differ by sex. Longitudinal analysis of a subgroup of residents who did not move during the study period found that persistent non-receipt of treatment in this subgroup was rare. Refusal to receive treatment was highest among adults and more common among females. CONCLUSION: In schistosomiasis high-risk communities, a combination of approaches to increasing treatment coverage, such as extended periods of treatment delivery, and the provision of incentives, may be required to achieve WHO targets. Public Library of Science 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7595614/ /pubmed/33075067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008718 Text en © 2020 Akurut et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Akurut, Hellen Sanya, Richard E. Lubyayi, Lawrence Nampijja, Margaret Kizza, Moses Kaweesa, James Kizindo, Robert Sewankambo, Moses Nsubuga, Denis Tukahebwa, Edridah Kabatereine, Narcis B. Elliott, Alison M. Webb, Emily L. Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial |
title | Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial |
title_full | Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial |
title_short | Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial |
title_sort | anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in lake victoria fishing communities, uganda: intervention coverage results from the laviiswa cluster randomised trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33075067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akuruthellen anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT sanyaricharde anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT lubyayilawrence anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT nampijjamargaret anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT kizzamoses anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT kaweesajames anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT kizindorobert anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT sewankambomoses anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT nsubugadenis anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT tukahebwaedridah anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT kabatereinenarcisb anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT elliottalisonm anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT webbemilyl anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial AT anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial |