Cargando…

Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is a cornerstone of control of parasitic helminths. In schistosomiasis-endemic areas with >50% of school-aged children infected, community-wide MDA with praziquantel is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), with target coverage of >75%....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akurut, Hellen, Sanya, Richard E., Lubyayi, Lawrence, Nampijja, Margaret, Kizza, Moses, Kaweesa, James, Kizindo, Robert, Sewankambo, Moses, Nsubuga, Denis, Tukahebwa, Edridah, Kabatereine, Narcis B., Elliott, Alison M., Webb, Emily L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33075067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008718
_version_ 1783601915755495424
author Akurut, Hellen
Sanya, Richard E.
Lubyayi, Lawrence
Nampijja, Margaret
Kizza, Moses
Kaweesa, James
Kizindo, Robert
Sewankambo, Moses
Nsubuga, Denis
Tukahebwa, Edridah
Kabatereine, Narcis B.
Elliott, Alison M.
Webb, Emily L.
author_facet Akurut, Hellen
Sanya, Richard E.
Lubyayi, Lawrence
Nampijja, Margaret
Kizza, Moses
Kaweesa, James
Kizindo, Robert
Sewankambo, Moses
Nsubuga, Denis
Tukahebwa, Edridah
Kabatereine, Narcis B.
Elliott, Alison M.
Webb, Emily L.
author_sort Akurut, Hellen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is a cornerstone of control of parasitic helminths. In schistosomiasis-endemic areas with >50% of school-aged children infected, community-wide MDA with praziquantel is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), with target coverage of >75%. Using data from a cluster-randomised trial of MDA treatment strategies, we aimed to describe the proportion of eligible residents who received MDA and predictors of treatment receipt, and to assess associations with helminth prevalence. METHODS: In the Koome islands of Lake Victoria, Uganda, where baseline schistosomiasis prevalence (by single stool sample, Kato Katz) was 52% overall (all ages) and 67% among school-aged children, we conducted a cluster-randomised trial of community-wide, intensive MDA (quarterly single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; triple-dose albendazole 400mg) versus standard, Uganda government intervention (annual single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; 6-monthly single-dose albendazole). Twenty-six fishing villages were randomised, 13 per trial arm, for four years. At each treatment round, praziquantel treatment and the first dose of albendazole treatment were directly observed by the study team, registers of village residents were updated and the proportion receiving treatment among those eligible recorded. RESULTS: During the four-year MDA, at each treatment round an average of 13,382 people were registered in the 26 villages (7,153 and 6,229 in standard and intensive intervention villages, respectively). Overall, the proportion of those eligible receiving praziquantel was lower than for albendazole (60% versus 65%), particularly in the standard arm (61% versus 71%) compared to the intensive arm (60% versus 62%). Albendazole receipt was lower when given concurrently with praziquantel. Absence was the commonest reason for non-receipt of treatment (81% albendazole, 77% praziquantel), followed by refusal (14% albendazole, 18% praziquantel). Proportions receiving treatment were lowest among school-aged children, but did not differ by sex. Longitudinal analysis of a subgroup of residents who did not move during the study period found that persistent non-receipt of treatment in this subgroup was rare. Refusal to receive treatment was highest among adults and more common among females. CONCLUSION: In schistosomiasis high-risk communities, a combination of approaches to increasing treatment coverage, such as extended periods of treatment delivery, and the provision of incentives, may be required to achieve WHO targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7595614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75956142020-11-03 Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial Akurut, Hellen Sanya, Richard E. Lubyayi, Lawrence Nampijja, Margaret Kizza, Moses Kaweesa, James Kizindo, Robert Sewankambo, Moses Nsubuga, Denis Tukahebwa, Edridah Kabatereine, Narcis B. Elliott, Alison M. Webb, Emily L. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is a cornerstone of control of parasitic helminths. In schistosomiasis-endemic areas with >50% of school-aged children infected, community-wide MDA with praziquantel is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), with target coverage of >75%. Using data from a cluster-randomised trial of MDA treatment strategies, we aimed to describe the proportion of eligible residents who received MDA and predictors of treatment receipt, and to assess associations with helminth prevalence. METHODS: In the Koome islands of Lake Victoria, Uganda, where baseline schistosomiasis prevalence (by single stool sample, Kato Katz) was 52% overall (all ages) and 67% among school-aged children, we conducted a cluster-randomised trial of community-wide, intensive MDA (quarterly single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; triple-dose albendazole 400mg) versus standard, Uganda government intervention (annual single-dose praziquantel 40mg/kg; 6-monthly single-dose albendazole). Twenty-six fishing villages were randomised, 13 per trial arm, for four years. At each treatment round, praziquantel treatment and the first dose of albendazole treatment were directly observed by the study team, registers of village residents were updated and the proportion receiving treatment among those eligible recorded. RESULTS: During the four-year MDA, at each treatment round an average of 13,382 people were registered in the 26 villages (7,153 and 6,229 in standard and intensive intervention villages, respectively). Overall, the proportion of those eligible receiving praziquantel was lower than for albendazole (60% versus 65%), particularly in the standard arm (61% versus 71%) compared to the intensive arm (60% versus 62%). Albendazole receipt was lower when given concurrently with praziquantel. Absence was the commonest reason for non-receipt of treatment (81% albendazole, 77% praziquantel), followed by refusal (14% albendazole, 18% praziquantel). Proportions receiving treatment were lowest among school-aged children, but did not differ by sex. Longitudinal analysis of a subgroup of residents who did not move during the study period found that persistent non-receipt of treatment in this subgroup was rare. Refusal to receive treatment was highest among adults and more common among females. CONCLUSION: In schistosomiasis high-risk communities, a combination of approaches to increasing treatment coverage, such as extended periods of treatment delivery, and the provision of incentives, may be required to achieve WHO targets. Public Library of Science 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7595614/ /pubmed/33075067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008718 Text en © 2020 Akurut et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Akurut, Hellen
Sanya, Richard E.
Lubyayi, Lawrence
Nampijja, Margaret
Kizza, Moses
Kaweesa, James
Kizindo, Robert
Sewankambo, Moses
Nsubuga, Denis
Tukahebwa, Edridah
Kabatereine, Narcis B.
Elliott, Alison M.
Webb, Emily L.
Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial
title Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial
title_full Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial
title_fullStr Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial
title_short Anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in Lake Victoria fishing communities, Uganda: Intervention coverage results from the LaVIISWA cluster randomised trial
title_sort anthelminthic treatment receipt and its predictors in lake victoria fishing communities, uganda: intervention coverage results from the laviiswa cluster randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33075067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008718
work_keys_str_mv AT akuruthellen anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT sanyaricharde anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT lubyayilawrence anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT nampijjamargaret anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kizzamoses anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kaweesajames anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kizindorobert anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT sewankambomoses anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT nsubugadenis anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT tukahebwaedridah anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kabatereinenarcisb anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT elliottalisonm anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT webbemilyl anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT anthelminthictreatmentreceiptanditspredictorsinlakevictoriafishingcommunitiesugandainterventioncoverageresultsfromthelaviiswaclusterrandomisedtrial