Cargando…

Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra- and interexaminer reproducibility of measurements of the resistance and static and dynamic compliance of the respiratory system in patients on mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This was an analytical study conducted with individuals aged ≥ 18 years who were on invasi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menezes Júnior, José da Natividade, Silva, Ludmilla Mota, Santos, Leonardo José Morais, Correia, Helena França, Lopes, Wende, Silva, Virgínia Eugênia Pinheiro e, dos Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta, Martinez, Bruno Prata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053029
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20200068
_version_ 1783601939490013184
author Menezes Júnior, José da Natividade
Silva, Ludmilla Mota
Santos, Leonardo José Morais
Correia, Helena França
Lopes, Wende
Silva, Virgínia Eugênia Pinheiro e
dos Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta
Martinez, Bruno Prata
author_facet Menezes Júnior, José da Natividade
Silva, Ludmilla Mota
Santos, Leonardo José Morais
Correia, Helena França
Lopes, Wende
Silva, Virgínia Eugênia Pinheiro e
dos Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta
Martinez, Bruno Prata
author_sort Menezes Júnior, José da Natividade
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra- and interexaminer reproducibility of measurements of the resistance and static and dynamic compliance of the respiratory system in patients on mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This was an analytical study conducted with individuals aged ≥ 18 years who were on invasive mechanical ventilation and had no clinical diagnosis of respiratory system disease and/or chest abnormality. Three measurements of respiratory mechanics were performed with a 1-minute interval between them. The first and third measurements were performed by examiner A, the second by examiner B. The values for the resistance and static and dynamic compliance of the respiratory system were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 198 measurements of respiratory mechanics were performed for 66 patients on mechanical ventilation. The patients had a mean age of 52.6 ± 18.6 years and a mean body mass index of 21.6 ± 2.1kg/m(2); a surgical profile (61.5%) and female sex (53.8%) were predominant. Mean values were obtained for the three measurements of respiratory system resistance (A1: 15.7 ± 6.8cmH(2)O/L/s; B1: 15.7 ± 6.4cmH(2)O/L/s and A2: 15.9 ± 6.2cmH(2)O/L/s), respiratory system static compliance (A1: 42.1 ± 13.7mL/cmH(2)O; B1: 42.4 ± 14.6mL/cmH(2)O and A2: 42.2 ± 14.5mL/cmH(2)O) and respiratory system dynamic compliance (A1: 21.3 ± 7.3mL/cmH(2)O; B1: 21.4 ± 7.5mL/cmH(2)O and A2: 21.3 ± 6.2mL/cmH(2)O). The intraclass correlation coefficient was also calculated for respiratory system resistance (R = 0.882 and p = 0.001; R = 0.949 and p = 0.001 - interexaminer A1 versus B and B versus A2, respectively; R = 0.932 and p = 0.001 - intraexaminer); respiratory system static compliance (R = 0.951 and p = 0.001; R = 0.958 and p = 0.001 - interexaminer A1 versus B and B versus A2, respectively; R = 0.965 and p = 0.001 - intraexaminer) and respiratory system dynamic compliance (R = 0.957 and p = 0.001; R = 0.946 and p = 0.001 - interexaminer A1 versus B and B versus A2, respectively; R = 0.926 and p = 0.001 - intraexaminer). CONCLUSION: The measurements of resistance and static and dynamic compliance of the respiratory system show good intra- and interexaminer reproducibility for ventilated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7595717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75957172020-11-03 Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation Menezes Júnior, José da Natividade Silva, Ludmilla Mota Santos, Leonardo José Morais Correia, Helena França Lopes, Wende Silva, Virgínia Eugênia Pinheiro e dos Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta Martinez, Bruno Prata Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra- and interexaminer reproducibility of measurements of the resistance and static and dynamic compliance of the respiratory system in patients on mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This was an analytical study conducted with individuals aged ≥ 18 years who were on invasive mechanical ventilation and had no clinical diagnosis of respiratory system disease and/or chest abnormality. Three measurements of respiratory mechanics were performed with a 1-minute interval between them. The first and third measurements were performed by examiner A, the second by examiner B. The values for the resistance and static and dynamic compliance of the respiratory system were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 198 measurements of respiratory mechanics were performed for 66 patients on mechanical ventilation. The patients had a mean age of 52.6 ± 18.6 years and a mean body mass index of 21.6 ± 2.1kg/m(2); a surgical profile (61.5%) and female sex (53.8%) were predominant. Mean values were obtained for the three measurements of respiratory system resistance (A1: 15.7 ± 6.8cmH(2)O/L/s; B1: 15.7 ± 6.4cmH(2)O/L/s and A2: 15.9 ± 6.2cmH(2)O/L/s), respiratory system static compliance (A1: 42.1 ± 13.7mL/cmH(2)O; B1: 42.4 ± 14.6mL/cmH(2)O and A2: 42.2 ± 14.5mL/cmH(2)O) and respiratory system dynamic compliance (A1: 21.3 ± 7.3mL/cmH(2)O; B1: 21.4 ± 7.5mL/cmH(2)O and A2: 21.3 ± 6.2mL/cmH(2)O). The intraclass correlation coefficient was also calculated for respiratory system resistance (R = 0.882 and p = 0.001; R = 0.949 and p = 0.001 - interexaminer A1 versus B and B versus A2, respectively; R = 0.932 and p = 0.001 - intraexaminer); respiratory system static compliance (R = 0.951 and p = 0.001; R = 0.958 and p = 0.001 - interexaminer A1 versus B and B versus A2, respectively; R = 0.965 and p = 0.001 - intraexaminer) and respiratory system dynamic compliance (R = 0.957 and p = 0.001; R = 0.946 and p = 0.001 - interexaminer A1 versus B and B versus A2, respectively; R = 0.926 and p = 0.001 - intraexaminer). CONCLUSION: The measurements of resistance and static and dynamic compliance of the respiratory system show good intra- and interexaminer reproducibility for ventilated patients. Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7595717/ /pubmed/33053029 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20200068 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Menezes Júnior, José da Natividade
Silva, Ludmilla Mota
Santos, Leonardo José Morais
Correia, Helena França
Lopes, Wende
Silva, Virgínia Eugênia Pinheiro e
dos Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta
Martinez, Bruno Prata
Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation
title Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation
title_full Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation
title_fullStr Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation
title_short Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation
title_sort reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053029
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20200068
work_keys_str_mv AT menezesjuniorjosedanatividade reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation
AT silvaludmillamota reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation
AT santosleonardojosemorais reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation
AT correiahelenafranca reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation
AT lopeswende reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation
AT silvavirginiaeugeniapinheiroe reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation
AT dosanjosjorgeluismotta reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation
AT martinezbrunoprata reproducibilityofrespiratorymechanicsmeasurementsinpatientsoninvasivemechanicalventilation