Cargando…

Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study

Objective  Antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy remains the primary form of treatment for epilepsy, noncompliance to which can result in breakthrough seizure, emergency department visits, fractures, head injuries, and increased mortality. Various tools like self-report measures, pill-counts, medication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Paramjit, Gupta, Kanchan, Singh, Gagandeep, Kaushal, Sandeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715991
_version_ 1783601956904763392
author Singh, Paramjit
Gupta, Kanchan
Singh, Gagandeep
Kaushal, Sandeep
author_facet Singh, Paramjit
Gupta, Kanchan
Singh, Gagandeep
Kaushal, Sandeep
author_sort Singh, Paramjit
collection PubMed
description Objective  Antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy remains the primary form of treatment for epilepsy, noncompliance to which can result in breakthrough seizure, emergency department visits, fractures, head injuries, and increased mortality. Various tools like self-report measures, pill-counts, medication refills, and frequency of seizures can assess compliance with varying extent. Thus, assessment of compliance with AEDs is crucial to be studied. Materials and Methods  Compliance was assessed using pill-count and Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS) during home visits. A pill-count (pills dispensed–pills remaining)/(pills to be consumed between two visits) value of 0.85 to ≤1.15 was recorded as appropriate compliance. Underdose (<0.85) and overdose (>1.15) was labeled as noncompliance. Score of 1 was given to each positive answer in MMAS. Score of ≥1 was labeled as noncompliance. Statistical analysis: Relationship of demographic factors between compliant and noncompliant patients was analyzed using Chi-square test (SPSS version 21.0, IBM). Rest of the data was analyzed with the help of descriptive statistics using Microsoft Excel. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results  Out of 105 patients, 54 patients were noncompliant with both pill-count and MMAS. 10 patients were noncompliant with pill-count only, while 10 were noncompliant with MMAS. Conclusion  Both tools complement each other when used in combination, as use of a single tool was not able to completely detect compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7595799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75957992020-11-02 Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study Singh, Paramjit Gupta, Kanchan Singh, Gagandeep Kaushal, Sandeep J Neurosci Rural Pract Objective  Antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy remains the primary form of treatment for epilepsy, noncompliance to which can result in breakthrough seizure, emergency department visits, fractures, head injuries, and increased mortality. Various tools like self-report measures, pill-counts, medication refills, and frequency of seizures can assess compliance with varying extent. Thus, assessment of compliance with AEDs is crucial to be studied. Materials and Methods  Compliance was assessed using pill-count and Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS) during home visits. A pill-count (pills dispensed–pills remaining)/(pills to be consumed between two visits) value of 0.85 to ≤1.15 was recorded as appropriate compliance. Underdose (<0.85) and overdose (>1.15) was labeled as noncompliance. Score of 1 was given to each positive answer in MMAS. Score of ≥1 was labeled as noncompliance. Statistical analysis: Relationship of demographic factors between compliant and noncompliant patients was analyzed using Chi-square test (SPSS version 21.0, IBM). Rest of the data was analyzed with the help of descriptive statistics using Microsoft Excel. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results  Out of 105 patients, 54 patients were noncompliant with both pill-count and MMAS. 10 patients were noncompliant with pill-count only, while 10 were noncompliant with MMAS. Conclusion  Both tools complement each other when used in combination, as use of a single tool was not able to completely detect compliance. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2020-10 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7595799/ /pubmed/33144803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715991 Text en Association for Helping Neurosurgical Sick People. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Singh, Paramjit
Gupta, Kanchan
Singh, Gagandeep
Kaushal, Sandeep
Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study
title Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study
title_full Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study
title_fullStr Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study
title_short Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study
title_sort simultaneous use of two different tools to assess compliance with antiepileptic drugs: experience in a community-based study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715991
work_keys_str_mv AT singhparamjit simultaneoususeoftwodifferenttoolstoassesscompliancewithantiepilepticdrugsexperienceinacommunitybasedstudy
AT guptakanchan simultaneoususeoftwodifferenttoolstoassesscompliancewithantiepilepticdrugsexperienceinacommunitybasedstudy
AT singhgagandeep simultaneoususeoftwodifferenttoolstoassesscompliancewithantiepilepticdrugsexperienceinacommunitybasedstudy
AT kaushalsandeep simultaneoususeoftwodifferenttoolstoassesscompliancewithantiepilepticdrugsexperienceinacommunitybasedstudy