Cargando…

Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Postoperative wound complications occurring after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are unique, as they can involve different tissue zones (subcutaneous, subfascial, osseous, peri-implant, and disc). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Management of postop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanna, Rishi Mugesh, Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan, Shetty, Ajoy Prasad, Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160726
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0247
_version_ 1783601959225262080
author Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan
Shetty, Ajoy Prasad
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
author_facet Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan
Shetty, Ajoy Prasad
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
author_sort Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Postoperative wound complications occurring after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are unique, as they can involve different tissue zones (subcutaneous, subfascial, osseous, peri-implant, and disc). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Management of postoperative infections occurring after TLIF remains controversial in the context of retention or removal of implants. METHODS: A total of 1,279 consecutive patients (1,520 segments) who underwent TLIF with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed. Patients with wound complications were classified anatomically into the following five types: type 1, suprafascial necrosis; type 2, wound dehiscence; type 3, pus around screws and rods; type 4, bone marrow edema; and type 5, pus in the disc space. Details pertaining to clinicoradiological and laboratory findings and management were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients (4.8%) with wound complications, there were seven patients in type 1, 35 in type 2, 10 in type 3, four in type 4, and six in type 5. Patients in types 1 and 2 manifested delayed wound healing and were systemically well. In type 1, five patients were managed with resuturing and two were managed conservatively. In type 2, all patients had wound gaping and were managed by debridement, whereas three patients required vacuum-assisted closure. Patients in type 3 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus around the screw site. Tissue culture identified organisms in 90% of the patients. Patients in type 4 presented with increasing back pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed vertebral bone marrow edema. Those in type 5 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus in the disc space. Patients in types 3–5 required debridement, implant revision/retention, and long-term antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The new anatomical classification of surgical site infections could help grade the severity of infection and provide tangible treatment guidelines, resulting in better infection clearance and patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7595808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75958082020-11-03 Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Kanna, Rishi Mugesh Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan Shetty, Ajoy Prasad Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Postoperative wound complications occurring after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are unique, as they can involve different tissue zones (subcutaneous, subfascial, osseous, peri-implant, and disc). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Management of postoperative infections occurring after TLIF remains controversial in the context of retention or removal of implants. METHODS: A total of 1,279 consecutive patients (1,520 segments) who underwent TLIF with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed. Patients with wound complications were classified anatomically into the following five types: type 1, suprafascial necrosis; type 2, wound dehiscence; type 3, pus around screws and rods; type 4, bone marrow edema; and type 5, pus in the disc space. Details pertaining to clinicoradiological and laboratory findings and management were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients (4.8%) with wound complications, there were seven patients in type 1, 35 in type 2, 10 in type 3, four in type 4, and six in type 5. Patients in types 1 and 2 manifested delayed wound healing and were systemically well. In type 1, five patients were managed with resuturing and two were managed conservatively. In type 2, all patients had wound gaping and were managed by debridement, whereas three patients required vacuum-assisted closure. Patients in type 3 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus around the screw site. Tissue culture identified organisms in 90% of the patients. Patients in type 4 presented with increasing back pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed vertebral bone marrow edema. Those in type 5 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus in the disc space. Patients in types 3–5 required debridement, implant revision/retention, and long-term antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The new anatomical classification of surgical site infections could help grade the severity of infection and provide tangible treatment guidelines, resulting in better infection clearance and patient outcomes. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2020-10 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7595808/ /pubmed/32160726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0247 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan
Shetty, Ajoy Prasad
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_short Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_sort classification and management algorithm for postoperative wound complications following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160726
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0247
work_keys_str_mv AT kannarishimugesh classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT renjithkarukayilramakrishnan classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT shettyajoyprasad classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion