Cargando…
Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Postoperative wound complications occurring after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are unique, as they can involve different tissue zones (subcutaneous, subfascial, osseous, peri-implant, and disc). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Management of postop...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0247 |
_version_ | 1783601959225262080 |
---|---|
author | Kanna, Rishi Mugesh Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan Shetty, Ajoy Prasad Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan |
author_facet | Kanna, Rishi Mugesh Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan Shetty, Ajoy Prasad Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan |
author_sort | Kanna, Rishi Mugesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Postoperative wound complications occurring after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are unique, as they can involve different tissue zones (subcutaneous, subfascial, osseous, peri-implant, and disc). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Management of postoperative infections occurring after TLIF remains controversial in the context of retention or removal of implants. METHODS: A total of 1,279 consecutive patients (1,520 segments) who underwent TLIF with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed. Patients with wound complications were classified anatomically into the following five types: type 1, suprafascial necrosis; type 2, wound dehiscence; type 3, pus around screws and rods; type 4, bone marrow edema; and type 5, pus in the disc space. Details pertaining to clinicoradiological and laboratory findings and management were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients (4.8%) with wound complications, there were seven patients in type 1, 35 in type 2, 10 in type 3, four in type 4, and six in type 5. Patients in types 1 and 2 manifested delayed wound healing and were systemically well. In type 1, five patients were managed with resuturing and two were managed conservatively. In type 2, all patients had wound gaping and were managed by debridement, whereas three patients required vacuum-assisted closure. Patients in type 3 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus around the screw site. Tissue culture identified organisms in 90% of the patients. Patients in type 4 presented with increasing back pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed vertebral bone marrow edema. Those in type 5 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus in the disc space. Patients in types 3–5 required debridement, implant revision/retention, and long-term antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The new anatomical classification of surgical site infections could help grade the severity of infection and provide tangible treatment guidelines, resulting in better infection clearance and patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7595808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75958082020-11-03 Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Kanna, Rishi Mugesh Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan Shetty, Ajoy Prasad Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Postoperative wound complications occurring after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are unique, as they can involve different tissue zones (subcutaneous, subfascial, osseous, peri-implant, and disc). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Management of postoperative infections occurring after TLIF remains controversial in the context of retention or removal of implants. METHODS: A total of 1,279 consecutive patients (1,520 segments) who underwent TLIF with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed. Patients with wound complications were classified anatomically into the following five types: type 1, suprafascial necrosis; type 2, wound dehiscence; type 3, pus around screws and rods; type 4, bone marrow edema; and type 5, pus in the disc space. Details pertaining to clinicoradiological and laboratory findings and management were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients (4.8%) with wound complications, there were seven patients in type 1, 35 in type 2, 10 in type 3, four in type 4, and six in type 5. Patients in types 1 and 2 manifested delayed wound healing and were systemically well. In type 1, five patients were managed with resuturing and two were managed conservatively. In type 2, all patients had wound gaping and were managed by debridement, whereas three patients required vacuum-assisted closure. Patients in type 3 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus around the screw site. Tissue culture identified organisms in 90% of the patients. Patients in type 4 presented with increasing back pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed vertebral bone marrow edema. Those in type 5 had severe back pain and fever, with demonstrable pus in the disc space. Patients in types 3–5 required debridement, implant revision/retention, and long-term antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The new anatomical classification of surgical site infections could help grade the severity of infection and provide tangible treatment guidelines, resulting in better infection clearance and patient outcomes. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2020-10 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7595808/ /pubmed/32160726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0247 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Kanna, Rishi Mugesh Renjith, Karukayil Ramakrishnan Shetty, Ajoy Prasad Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title | Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full | Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_fullStr | Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_short | Classification and Management Algorithm for Postoperative Wound Complications Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_sort | classification and management algorithm for postoperative wound complications following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kannarishimugesh classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT renjithkarukayilramakrishnan classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT shettyajoyprasad classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan classificationandmanagementalgorithmforpostoperativewoundcomplicationsfollowingtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion |