Cargando…
24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study
INTRODUCTION: Few studies have utilized 24-h serial spirometry to compare the effects of inhaled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapies on lung function. The FULFIL study previously reported significant lung function improvements with once-daily single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/ume...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33011864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01496-7 |
_version_ | 1783602009146916864 |
---|---|
author | Lipson, David A. Birk, Ruby Brealey, Noushin Zhu, Chang-Qing |
author_facet | Lipson, David A. Birk, Ruby Brealey, Noushin Zhu, Chang-Qing |
author_sort | Lipson, David A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Few studies have utilized 24-h serial spirometry to compare the effects of inhaled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapies on lung function. The FULFIL study previously reported significant lung function improvements with once-daily single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus twice-daily single-inhaler budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations. METHODS: This prespecified analysis evaluated 24-h serial spirometry data from a subgroup of 406 patients in FULFIL. BUD/FOR twice-daily dosing was maintained during 24-h spirometry. A post hoc analysis evaluated serial forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) at day 1 and week 24 by disease severity at screening (FEV(1) < 50% predicted and no moderate or severe exacerbation in prior year, FEV(1) < 50% predicted and ≥ 1 moderate or severe exacerbation in prior year, and FEV(1) ≥ 50% and < 80% predicted and ≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe exacerbations in prior year). RESULTS: Odds of achieving a ≥ 100-mL increase from baseline in FEV(1) within the first 6 h post dose on day 1 were significantly greater with FF/UMEC/VI than BUD/FOR [odds ratio 2.79 (95% confidence interval 1.56–4.98); p < 0.001]. FF/UMEC/VI led to greater improvements in weighted mean FEV(1) over 0–6, 0–12, 0–24, and 12–24 h on day 1 and at week 24, with the greatest between-group differences at week 24 (range 196–210 mL; all p < 0.001). Significant between-treatment differences in FEV(1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in favor of FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR were seen at all time points at week 24 (FEV(1) range 156–231 mL, all p < 0.001; FVC range 139–309 mL, all p ≤ 0.002). Serial FEV(1) results were consistent irrespective of disease severity at screening. CONCLUSION: These findings further demonstrate sustained lung function benefits with once-daily FF/UMEC/VI single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations across a range of disease severities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7595993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75959932020-11-10 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study Lipson, David A. Birk, Ruby Brealey, Noushin Zhu, Chang-Qing Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Few studies have utilized 24-h serial spirometry to compare the effects of inhaled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapies on lung function. The FULFIL study previously reported significant lung function improvements with once-daily single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus twice-daily single-inhaler budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations. METHODS: This prespecified analysis evaluated 24-h serial spirometry data from a subgroup of 406 patients in FULFIL. BUD/FOR twice-daily dosing was maintained during 24-h spirometry. A post hoc analysis evaluated serial forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) at day 1 and week 24 by disease severity at screening (FEV(1) < 50% predicted and no moderate or severe exacerbation in prior year, FEV(1) < 50% predicted and ≥ 1 moderate or severe exacerbation in prior year, and FEV(1) ≥ 50% and < 80% predicted and ≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe exacerbations in prior year). RESULTS: Odds of achieving a ≥ 100-mL increase from baseline in FEV(1) within the first 6 h post dose on day 1 were significantly greater with FF/UMEC/VI than BUD/FOR [odds ratio 2.79 (95% confidence interval 1.56–4.98); p < 0.001]. FF/UMEC/VI led to greater improvements in weighted mean FEV(1) over 0–6, 0–12, 0–24, and 12–24 h on day 1 and at week 24, with the greatest between-group differences at week 24 (range 196–210 mL; all p < 0.001). Significant between-treatment differences in FEV(1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in favor of FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR were seen at all time points at week 24 (FEV(1) range 156–231 mL, all p < 0.001; FVC range 139–309 mL, all p ≤ 0.002). Serial FEV(1) results were consistent irrespective of disease severity at screening. CONCLUSION: These findings further demonstrate sustained lung function benefits with once-daily FF/UMEC/VI single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations across a range of disease severities. Springer Healthcare 2020-10-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7595993/ /pubmed/33011864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01496-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lipson, David A. Birk, Ruby Brealey, Noushin Zhu, Chang-Qing 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study |
title | 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study |
title_full | 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study |
title_fullStr | 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study |
title_full_unstemmed | 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study |
title_short | 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study |
title_sort | 24-hour serial spirometric assessment of once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus twice-daily budesonide/formoterol in patients with copd: analysis of the fulfil study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33011864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01496-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipsondavida 24hourserialspirometricassessmentofoncedailyfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolversustwicedailybudesonideformoterolinpatientswithcopdanalysisofthefulfilstudy AT birkruby 24hourserialspirometricassessmentofoncedailyfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolversustwicedailybudesonideformoterolinpatientswithcopdanalysisofthefulfilstudy AT brealeynoushin 24hourserialspirometricassessmentofoncedailyfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolversustwicedailybudesonideformoterolinpatientswithcopdanalysisofthefulfilstudy AT zhuchangqing 24hourserialspirometricassessmentofoncedailyfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolversustwicedailybudesonideformoterolinpatientswithcopdanalysisofthefulfilstudy |