Cargando…

Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines

Seedling grafting could provide additional crop improvement strategies for cotton. However, there existed limited studies on interspecific grafting and approaches. Four different grafting approaches were developed and compared between lines representing three of the four cultivated cotton species G....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karaca, Mehmet, Ince, Ayse Gul, Reddy, Umesh K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75679-1
_version_ 1783602032195665920
author Karaca, Mehmet
Ince, Ayse Gul
Reddy, Umesh K.
author_facet Karaca, Mehmet
Ince, Ayse Gul
Reddy, Umesh K.
author_sort Karaca, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description Seedling grafting could provide additional crop improvement strategies for cotton. However, there existed limited studies on interspecific grafting and approaches. Four different grafting approaches were developed and compared between lines representing three of the four cultivated cotton species G. hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum. Grafting approaches of this study focused on the cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves retained on scions, rootstocks, without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on scions and rootstocks or halved cotyledon node and single cotyledon leaf on scions and rootstocks. Evaluations of the grafting approaches were made by comparing survival and growth rate during the second and fifth weeks after transplantation, respectively. The formation of any lateral shoots at the grafted sites were studied in two of four grafting approaches in the first and the second year during flowering stage. DNA alterations due to grafting were investigated using microsatellite markers. There were no statistically significant differences between grafts and their control in survival rate and locus specific DNA alteration. Growth rate and lateral shoot formation, on the other hand, were different among grafting types and grafts. We concluded that grafting without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on rootstocks, and with cotyledon node but without cotyledon leaves on scions were easy to perform and suitable for interspecific cotton grafting. Results suggested that grafting seedlings and allowing time to heal graft wounds prior to spring transplanting or double cropping is suitable for wheat–cotton intercropping to prevent late or early chilling damage associated with seed sowing or conventional transplanting of susceptible seedlings. Furthermore, the rapid and consistent wound healing in seedling grafts along with lateral shoot formation occurring in two of four grafting approaches make them a suitable approach to investigate possible genetic and epigenetic movement between scions and rootstocks, especially across species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7596078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75960782020-10-30 Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines Karaca, Mehmet Ince, Ayse Gul Reddy, Umesh K. Sci Rep Article Seedling grafting could provide additional crop improvement strategies for cotton. However, there existed limited studies on interspecific grafting and approaches. Four different grafting approaches were developed and compared between lines representing three of the four cultivated cotton species G. hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum. Grafting approaches of this study focused on the cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves retained on scions, rootstocks, without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on scions and rootstocks or halved cotyledon node and single cotyledon leaf on scions and rootstocks. Evaluations of the grafting approaches were made by comparing survival and growth rate during the second and fifth weeks after transplantation, respectively. The formation of any lateral shoots at the grafted sites were studied in two of four grafting approaches in the first and the second year during flowering stage. DNA alterations due to grafting were investigated using microsatellite markers. There were no statistically significant differences between grafts and their control in survival rate and locus specific DNA alteration. Growth rate and lateral shoot formation, on the other hand, were different among grafting types and grafts. We concluded that grafting without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on rootstocks, and with cotyledon node but without cotyledon leaves on scions were easy to perform and suitable for interspecific cotton grafting. Results suggested that grafting seedlings and allowing time to heal graft wounds prior to spring transplanting or double cropping is suitable for wheat–cotton intercropping to prevent late or early chilling damage associated with seed sowing or conventional transplanting of susceptible seedlings. Furthermore, the rapid and consistent wound healing in seedling grafts along with lateral shoot formation occurring in two of four grafting approaches make them a suitable approach to investigate possible genetic and epigenetic movement between scions and rootstocks, especially across species. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7596078/ /pubmed/33122752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75679-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Karaca, Mehmet
Ince, Ayse Gul
Reddy, Umesh K.
Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines
title Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines
title_full Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines
title_fullStr Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines
title_full_unstemmed Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines
title_short Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines
title_sort interspecific grafting between gossypium hirsutum, g. barbadense and g. herbaceum lines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75679-1
work_keys_str_mv AT karacamehmet interspecificgraftingbetweengossypiumhirsutumgbarbadenseandgherbaceumlines
AT inceaysegul interspecificgraftingbetweengossypiumhirsutumgbarbadenseandgherbaceumlines
AT reddyumeshk interspecificgraftingbetweengossypiumhirsutumgbarbadenseandgherbaceumlines