Cargando…
Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible
When ovarian stimulation is unfeasible, in vitro maturation (IVM) represents an alternative option for fertility preservation (FP). This retrospective study aims to evaluate the feasibility of performing within a short time frame two IVM cycles for FP. Seventeen women with breast cancer, 18–40 years...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75699-x |
_version_ | 1783602034419695616 |
---|---|
author | Sermondade, Nathalie Grynberg, Michaël Comtet, Marjorie Valdelievre, Constance Sifer, Christophe Sonigo, Charlotte |
author_facet | Sermondade, Nathalie Grynberg, Michaël Comtet, Marjorie Valdelievre, Constance Sifer, Christophe Sonigo, Charlotte |
author_sort | Sermondade, Nathalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | When ovarian stimulation is unfeasible, in vitro maturation (IVM) represents an alternative option for fertility preservation (FP). This retrospective study aims to evaluate the feasibility of performing within a short time frame two IVM cycles for FP. Seventeen women with breast cancer, 18–40 years of age, having undergone 2 cycles of IVM followed by oocyte vitrification were included. Non parametric analyses were used. No difference was observed between IVM1 and IVM2 outcomes. No complication was reported. The respective contributions of IVM1 and IVM2 for the number of cryopreserved oocytes were comparable irrespective of the delay between both procedures, even when performed during the same menstrual cycle. Those findings suggest that repeating IVM cycles may constitute a safe option for increasing the number of vitrified mature oocytes for FP. These two retrievals may be performed during the same cycle, providing additional argument for a physiologic continuous recruitment during follicular development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7596087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75960872020-10-30 Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible Sermondade, Nathalie Grynberg, Michaël Comtet, Marjorie Valdelievre, Constance Sifer, Christophe Sonigo, Charlotte Sci Rep Article When ovarian stimulation is unfeasible, in vitro maturation (IVM) represents an alternative option for fertility preservation (FP). This retrospective study aims to evaluate the feasibility of performing within a short time frame two IVM cycles for FP. Seventeen women with breast cancer, 18–40 years of age, having undergone 2 cycles of IVM followed by oocyte vitrification were included. Non parametric analyses were used. No difference was observed between IVM1 and IVM2 outcomes. No complication was reported. The respective contributions of IVM1 and IVM2 for the number of cryopreserved oocytes were comparable irrespective of the delay between both procedures, even when performed during the same menstrual cycle. Those findings suggest that repeating IVM cycles may constitute a safe option for increasing the number of vitrified mature oocytes for FP. These two retrievals may be performed during the same cycle, providing additional argument for a physiologic continuous recruitment during follicular development. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7596087/ /pubmed/33122722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75699-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Sermondade, Nathalie Grynberg, Michaël Comtet, Marjorie Valdelievre, Constance Sifer, Christophe Sonigo, Charlotte Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible |
title | Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible |
title_full | Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible |
title_fullStr | Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible |
title_full_unstemmed | Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible |
title_short | Double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible |
title_sort | double-in vitro maturation increases the number of vitrified oocytes available for fertility preservation when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75699-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sermondadenathalie doubleinvitromaturationincreasesthenumberofvitrifiedoocytesavailableforfertilitypreservationwhenovarianstimulationisunfeasible AT grynbergmichael doubleinvitromaturationincreasesthenumberofvitrifiedoocytesavailableforfertilitypreservationwhenovarianstimulationisunfeasible AT comtetmarjorie doubleinvitromaturationincreasesthenumberofvitrifiedoocytesavailableforfertilitypreservationwhenovarianstimulationisunfeasible AT valdelievreconstance doubleinvitromaturationincreasesthenumberofvitrifiedoocytesavailableforfertilitypreservationwhenovarianstimulationisunfeasible AT siferchristophe doubleinvitromaturationincreasesthenumberofvitrifiedoocytesavailableforfertilitypreservationwhenovarianstimulationisunfeasible AT sonigocharlotte doubleinvitromaturationincreasesthenumberofvitrifiedoocytesavailableforfertilitypreservationwhenovarianstimulationisunfeasible |