Cargando…
Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
Human taste perception is associated with the papillae on the tongue as they contain a large proportion of chemoreceptors for basic tastes and other chemosensation. Especially the density of fungiform papillae (FP) is considered as an index for responsiveness to oral chemosensory stimuli. The standa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75678-2 |
_version_ | 1783602037058961408 |
---|---|
author | Cattaneo, Camilla Liu, Jing Wang, Chenhao Pagliarini, Ella Sporring, Jon Bredie, Wender L. P. |
author_facet | Cattaneo, Camilla Liu, Jing Wang, Chenhao Pagliarini, Ella Sporring, Jon Bredie, Wender L. P. |
author_sort | Cattaneo, Camilla |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human taste perception is associated with the papillae on the tongue as they contain a large proportion of chemoreceptors for basic tastes and other chemosensation. Especially the density of fungiform papillae (FP) is considered as an index for responsiveness to oral chemosensory stimuli. The standard procedure for FP counting involves visual identification and manual counting of specific parts of the tongue by trained operators. This is a tedious task and automated image analysis methods are desirable. In this paper a machine learning image processing method based on a convolutional neural network is presented. This automated method was compared with three standard manual FP counting procedures using tongue pictures from 132 subjects. Automated FP counts, within the selected areas and the whole tongue, significantly correlated with the manual counting methods (all ρs ≥ 0.76). When comparing the images for gender and PROP status, the density of FP predicted from automated analysis was in good agreement with data from the manual counting methods, especially in the case of gender. Moreover, the present results reinforce the idea that caution should be applied in considering the relationship between FP density and PROP responsiveness since this relationship can be an oversimplification of the complexity of phenomena arising at the central and peripherical levels. Indeed, no significant correlations were found between FP and PROP bitterness ratings using the automated method for selected areas or the whole tongue. Besides providing estimates of the number of FP, the machine learning approach used a tongue coordinate system that normalizes the size and shape of an individual tongue and generated a heat map of the FP position and normalized area they cover. The present study demonstrated that the machine learning approach could provide similar estimates of FP on the tongue as compared to manual counting methods and provide estimates of more difficult-to-measure parameters, such as the papillae's areas and shape. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7596097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75960972020-10-30 Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue Cattaneo, Camilla Liu, Jing Wang, Chenhao Pagliarini, Ella Sporring, Jon Bredie, Wender L. P. Sci Rep Article Human taste perception is associated with the papillae on the tongue as they contain a large proportion of chemoreceptors for basic tastes and other chemosensation. Especially the density of fungiform papillae (FP) is considered as an index for responsiveness to oral chemosensory stimuli. The standard procedure for FP counting involves visual identification and manual counting of specific parts of the tongue by trained operators. This is a tedious task and automated image analysis methods are desirable. In this paper a machine learning image processing method based on a convolutional neural network is presented. This automated method was compared with three standard manual FP counting procedures using tongue pictures from 132 subjects. Automated FP counts, within the selected areas and the whole tongue, significantly correlated with the manual counting methods (all ρs ≥ 0.76). When comparing the images for gender and PROP status, the density of FP predicted from automated analysis was in good agreement with data from the manual counting methods, especially in the case of gender. Moreover, the present results reinforce the idea that caution should be applied in considering the relationship between FP density and PROP responsiveness since this relationship can be an oversimplification of the complexity of phenomena arising at the central and peripherical levels. Indeed, no significant correlations were found between FP and PROP bitterness ratings using the automated method for selected areas or the whole tongue. Besides providing estimates of the number of FP, the machine learning approach used a tongue coordinate system that normalizes the size and shape of an individual tongue and generated a heat map of the FP position and normalized area they cover. The present study demonstrated that the machine learning approach could provide similar estimates of FP on the tongue as compared to manual counting methods and provide estimates of more difficult-to-measure parameters, such as the papillae's areas and shape. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7596097/ /pubmed/33122666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75678-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Cattaneo, Camilla Liu, Jing Wang, Chenhao Pagliarini, Ella Sporring, Jon Bredie, Wender L. P. Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue |
title | Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue |
title_full | Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue |
title_fullStr | Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue |
title_short | Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue |
title_sort | comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75678-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cattaneocamilla comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue AT liujing comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue AT wangchenhao comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue AT pagliariniella comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue AT sporringjon comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue AT brediewenderlp comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue |