Cargando…

Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue

Human taste perception is associated with the papillae on the tongue as they contain a large proportion of chemoreceptors for basic tastes and other chemosensation. Especially the density of fungiform papillae (FP) is considered as an index for responsiveness to oral chemosensory stimuli. The standa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cattaneo, Camilla, Liu, Jing, Wang, Chenhao, Pagliarini, Ella, Sporring, Jon, Bredie, Wender L. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75678-2
_version_ 1783602037058961408
author Cattaneo, Camilla
Liu, Jing
Wang, Chenhao
Pagliarini, Ella
Sporring, Jon
Bredie, Wender L. P.
author_facet Cattaneo, Camilla
Liu, Jing
Wang, Chenhao
Pagliarini, Ella
Sporring, Jon
Bredie, Wender L. P.
author_sort Cattaneo, Camilla
collection PubMed
description Human taste perception is associated with the papillae on the tongue as they contain a large proportion of chemoreceptors for basic tastes and other chemosensation. Especially the density of fungiform papillae (FP) is considered as an index for responsiveness to oral chemosensory stimuli. The standard procedure for FP counting involves visual identification and manual counting of specific parts of the tongue by trained operators. This is a tedious task and automated image analysis methods are desirable. In this paper a machine learning image processing method based on a convolutional neural network is presented. This automated method was compared with three standard manual FP counting procedures using tongue pictures from 132 subjects. Automated FP counts, within the selected areas and the whole tongue, significantly correlated with the manual counting methods (all ρs ≥ 0.76). When comparing the images for gender and PROP status, the density of FP predicted from automated analysis was in good agreement with data from the manual counting methods, especially in the case of gender. Moreover, the present results reinforce the idea that caution should be applied in considering the relationship between FP density and PROP responsiveness since this relationship can be an oversimplification of the complexity of phenomena arising at the central and peripherical levels. Indeed, no significant correlations were found between FP and PROP bitterness ratings using the automated method for selected areas or the whole tongue. Besides providing estimates of the number of FP, the machine learning approach used a tongue coordinate system that normalizes the size and shape of an individual tongue and generated a heat map of the FP position and normalized area they cover. The present study demonstrated that the machine learning approach could provide similar estimates of FP on the tongue as compared to manual counting methods and provide estimates of more difficult-to-measure parameters, such as the papillae's areas and shape.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7596097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75960972020-10-30 Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue Cattaneo, Camilla Liu, Jing Wang, Chenhao Pagliarini, Ella Sporring, Jon Bredie, Wender L. P. Sci Rep Article Human taste perception is associated with the papillae on the tongue as they contain a large proportion of chemoreceptors for basic tastes and other chemosensation. Especially the density of fungiform papillae (FP) is considered as an index for responsiveness to oral chemosensory stimuli. The standard procedure for FP counting involves visual identification and manual counting of specific parts of the tongue by trained operators. This is a tedious task and automated image analysis methods are desirable. In this paper a machine learning image processing method based on a convolutional neural network is presented. This automated method was compared with three standard manual FP counting procedures using tongue pictures from 132 subjects. Automated FP counts, within the selected areas and the whole tongue, significantly correlated with the manual counting methods (all ρs ≥ 0.76). When comparing the images for gender and PROP status, the density of FP predicted from automated analysis was in good agreement with data from the manual counting methods, especially in the case of gender. Moreover, the present results reinforce the idea that caution should be applied in considering the relationship between FP density and PROP responsiveness since this relationship can be an oversimplification of the complexity of phenomena arising at the central and peripherical levels. Indeed, no significant correlations were found between FP and PROP bitterness ratings using the automated method for selected areas or the whole tongue. Besides providing estimates of the number of FP, the machine learning approach used a tongue coordinate system that normalizes the size and shape of an individual tongue and generated a heat map of the FP position and normalized area they cover. The present study demonstrated that the machine learning approach could provide similar estimates of FP on the tongue as compared to manual counting methods and provide estimates of more difficult-to-measure parameters, such as the papillae's areas and shape. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7596097/ /pubmed/33122666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75678-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Cattaneo, Camilla
Liu, Jing
Wang, Chenhao
Pagliarini, Ella
Sporring, Jon
Bredie, Wender L. P.
Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
title Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
title_full Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
title_fullStr Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
title_short Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
title_sort comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75678-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cattaneocamilla comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue
AT liujing comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue
AT wangchenhao comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue
AT pagliariniella comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue
AT sporringjon comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue
AT brediewenderlp comparisonofmanualandmachinelearningimageprocessingapproachestodeterminefungiformpapillaeonthetongue