Cargando…
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice
The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is effective in terminating life-threatening arrhythmias. However, in the last phase of life, ICD shocks may no longer be appropriate. Guidelines recommend timely discussion with the patient regarding deactivation of the shock function of the ICD. How...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01438-6 |
_version_ | 1783602040177426432 |
---|---|
author | Stoevelaar, R. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A. van Bruchem-Visser, R. L. van Driel, A. G. Bhagwandien, R. E. Theuns, D. A. M. J. Rietjens, J. A. C. van der Heide, A. |
author_facet | Stoevelaar, R. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A. van Bruchem-Visser, R. L. van Driel, A. G. Bhagwandien, R. E. Theuns, D. A. M. J. Rietjens, J. A. C. van der Heide, A. |
author_sort | Stoevelaar, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is effective in terminating life-threatening arrhythmias. However, in the last phase of life, ICD shocks may no longer be appropriate. Guidelines recommend timely discussion with the patient regarding deactivation of the shock function of the ICD. However, research shows that such conversations are scarce, and some patients experience avoidable and distressful shocks in the final days of life. Barriers such as physicians’ lack of time, difficulties in finding the right time to discuss ICD deactivation, patients’ reluctance to discuss the topic, and the fragmentation of care, which obscures responsibilities, prevent healthcare professionals from discussing this topic with the patient. In this point-of-view article, we argue that healthcare professionals who are involved in the care for ICD patients should be better educated on how to communicate with patients about ICD deactivation and the end of life. Optimal communication is needed to reduce the number of patients experiencing inappropriate and painful shocks in the terminal stage of their lives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7596123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75961232020-11-10 Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice Stoevelaar, R. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A. van Bruchem-Visser, R. L. van Driel, A. G. Bhagwandien, R. E. Theuns, D. A. M. J. Rietjens, J. A. C. van der Heide, A. Neth Heart J Point of View The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is effective in terminating life-threatening arrhythmias. However, in the last phase of life, ICD shocks may no longer be appropriate. Guidelines recommend timely discussion with the patient regarding deactivation of the shock function of the ICD. However, research shows that such conversations are scarce, and some patients experience avoidable and distressful shocks in the final days of life. Barriers such as physicians’ lack of time, difficulties in finding the right time to discuss ICD deactivation, patients’ reluctance to discuss the topic, and the fragmentation of care, which obscures responsibilities, prevent healthcare professionals from discussing this topic with the patient. In this point-of-view article, we argue that healthcare professionals who are involved in the care for ICD patients should be better educated on how to communicate with patients about ICD deactivation and the end of life. Optimal communication is needed to reduce the number of patients experiencing inappropriate and painful shocks in the terminal stage of their lives. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-06-16 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7596123/ /pubmed/32548800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01438-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Point of View Stoevelaar, R. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A. van Bruchem-Visser, R. L. van Driel, A. G. Bhagwandien, R. E. Theuns, D. A. M. J. Rietjens, J. A. C. van der Heide, A. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice |
title | Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice |
title_full | Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice |
title_short | Implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice |
title_sort | implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life: future perspectives on clinical practice |
topic | Point of View |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01438-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoevelaarr implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice AT brinkmanstoppelenburga implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice AT vanbruchemvisserrl implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice AT vandrielag implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice AT bhagwandienre implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice AT theunsdamj implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice AT rietjensjac implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice AT vanderheidea implantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsattheendoflifefutureperspectivesonclinicalpractice |