Cargando…

Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the radiology report turnaround time (RTAT) between decentralized/modality-based and centralized/subspecialized radiological reporting at a multi-center radiology enterprise. METHODS: RTAT values for MRI, CT, and conventional radiography were co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zabel, Andreas Otto Josef, Leschka, Sebastian, Wildermuth, Simon, Hodler, Juerg, Dietrich, Tobias Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00917-z
_version_ 1783602043700641792
author Zabel, Andreas Otto Josef
Leschka, Sebastian
Wildermuth, Simon
Hodler, Juerg
Dietrich, Tobias Johannes
author_facet Zabel, Andreas Otto Josef
Leschka, Sebastian
Wildermuth, Simon
Hodler, Juerg
Dietrich, Tobias Johannes
author_sort Zabel, Andreas Otto Josef
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the radiology report turnaround time (RTAT) between decentralized/modality-based and centralized/subspecialized radiological reporting at a multi-center radiology enterprise. METHODS: RTAT values for MRI, CT, and conventional radiography were compared between decentralized/modality-based (04 September 2017–22 December 2017) and centralized/subspecialized radiology (03 September 2018–21 December 2018) reporting grouped into three subspecializations (body radiology, musculoskeletal radiology, and neuroradiology) at eleven sites of a multi-center radiology enterprise. For the objective of this investigation, hospitals were defined as major and minor hospitals. The Mann-Whitney U test served for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Change of reporting system from decentralized/modality-based to centralized/subspecialized radiology resulted overall in a significant decrease of the RTAT: from 82 to 77 min for the first signature (p < 0.001), and 119 to 107 min and 295 to 238 min for the second signature (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrate a significant decrease of the RTAT for MRI reports (e.g., second signature RTAT, 1051 to 401 min; p < 0.001) and conventional radiographs (e. g., second signature RTAT, 278 to 171 min; p < 0.001). The RTAT at major hospitals decreased from 288 to 245 min (second signature; p < 0.001) while the corresponding RTAT of minor hospitals decreased more remarkably, from 300 to 198 min (p < 0.001). However, the results were heterogenous; in some analyses, the RTAT even increased. The effect size analyses represent small effects. CONCLUSIONS: Change of reporting system from decentralized/modality-based to centralized/subspecialized radiology was associated with a significant decreased RTAT. Specifically, the RTAT for MRI reports and conventional radiographs was significantly reduced. A pronounced RTAT decrease was observed at minor hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7596149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75961492020-11-02 Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time Zabel, Andreas Otto Josef Leschka, Sebastian Wildermuth, Simon Hodler, Juerg Dietrich, Tobias Johannes Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the radiology report turnaround time (RTAT) between decentralized/modality-based and centralized/subspecialized radiological reporting at a multi-center radiology enterprise. METHODS: RTAT values for MRI, CT, and conventional radiography were compared between decentralized/modality-based (04 September 2017–22 December 2017) and centralized/subspecialized radiology (03 September 2018–21 December 2018) reporting grouped into three subspecializations (body radiology, musculoskeletal radiology, and neuroradiology) at eleven sites of a multi-center radiology enterprise. For the objective of this investigation, hospitals were defined as major and minor hospitals. The Mann-Whitney U test served for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Change of reporting system from decentralized/modality-based to centralized/subspecialized radiology resulted overall in a significant decrease of the RTAT: from 82 to 77 min for the first signature (p < 0.001), and 119 to 107 min and 295 to 238 min for the second signature (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrate a significant decrease of the RTAT for MRI reports (e.g., second signature RTAT, 1051 to 401 min; p < 0.001) and conventional radiographs (e. g., second signature RTAT, 278 to 171 min; p < 0.001). The RTAT at major hospitals decreased from 288 to 245 min (second signature; p < 0.001) while the corresponding RTAT of minor hospitals decreased more remarkably, from 300 to 198 min (p < 0.001). However, the results were heterogenous; in some analyses, the RTAT even increased. The effect size analyses represent small effects. CONCLUSIONS: Change of reporting system from decentralized/modality-based to centralized/subspecialized radiology was associated with a significant decreased RTAT. Specifically, the RTAT for MRI reports and conventional radiographs was significantly reduced. A pronounced RTAT decrease was observed at minor hospitals. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7596149/ /pubmed/33123830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00917-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zabel, Andreas Otto Josef
Leschka, Sebastian
Wildermuth, Simon
Hodler, Juerg
Dietrich, Tobias Johannes
Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time
title Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time
title_full Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time
title_fullStr Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time
title_full_unstemmed Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time
title_short Subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time
title_sort subspecialized radiological reporting reduces radiology report turnaround time
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00917-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zabelandreasottojosef subspecializedradiologicalreportingreducesradiologyreportturnaroundtime
AT leschkasebastian subspecializedradiologicalreportingreducesradiologyreportturnaroundtime
AT wildermuthsimon subspecializedradiologicalreportingreducesradiologyreportturnaroundtime
AT hodlerjuerg subspecializedradiologicalreportingreducesradiologyreportturnaroundtime
AT dietrichtobiasjohannes subspecializedradiologicalreportingreducesradiologyreportturnaroundtime