Cargando…

Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

INTRODUCTION: Requirement of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known and common postoperative consequence of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Emory risk score has been recently developed to help risk stratify the need for PPM insertion in patients undergoing TAVR with SAP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spring, Alexander M., Catalano, Michael A., Prasad, Vikram, Rutkin, Bruce, Koss, Elana, Hartman, Alan, Yu, Pey-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1807909
_version_ 1783602116424630272
author Spring, Alexander M.
Catalano, Michael A.
Prasad, Vikram
Rutkin, Bruce
Koss, Elana
Hartman, Alan
Yu, Pey-Jen
author_facet Spring, Alexander M.
Catalano, Michael A.
Prasad, Vikram
Rutkin, Bruce
Koss, Elana
Hartman, Alan
Yu, Pey-Jen
author_sort Spring, Alexander M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Requirement of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known and common postoperative consequence of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Emory risk score has been recently developed to help risk stratify the need for PPM insertion in patients undergoing TAVR with SAPIEN 3 valves. Our aim was to assess the validity of this risk score in our patient population, as well as its applicability to patients receiving self-expanding valves. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 479 TAVR patients without preoperative pacemakers from November 2016 through December 2018. Preoperative risk factors included in the Emory risk score were collected for each patient: preoperative QRS, preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB), preoperative syncope, and degree of valve oversizing. Multivariable analysis of the individual variables within the scoring system to identify predictors of PPM placement was performed. The predictive discrimination of the risk score for the risk of PPM placement after TAVR was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that, of the 479 patients analyzed, 236 (49.3%) received balloon-expandable valves and 243 (50.7%) received self-expanding valves. Pacemaker rates were higher in patients receiving self-expanding valves than those receiving balloon-expandable valves (25.1% versus 16.1%, p=0.018). The Emory risk score showed a moderate correlation with pacemaker requirement in patients receiving each valve type, with AUC for balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves of 0.657 and 0.645, respectively. Of the four risk score components, preoperative RBBB was the only predictor of pacemaker requirement with an AUC of 0.615 for both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves. Conclusion. In our cohort, the Emory risk score had modest predictive utility for PPM insertion after balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVR. The risk score did not offer better discriminatory utility than that of preoperative RBBB alone. Understanding the determinants of PPM insertion after TAVR can better guide patient education and postoperative management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7596463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75964632020-11-03 Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Spring, Alexander M. Catalano, Michael A. Prasad, Vikram Rutkin, Bruce Koss, Elana Hartman, Alan Yu, Pey-Jen J Interv Cardiol Research Article INTRODUCTION: Requirement of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known and common postoperative consequence of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Emory risk score has been recently developed to help risk stratify the need for PPM insertion in patients undergoing TAVR with SAPIEN 3 valves. Our aim was to assess the validity of this risk score in our patient population, as well as its applicability to patients receiving self-expanding valves. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 479 TAVR patients without preoperative pacemakers from November 2016 through December 2018. Preoperative risk factors included in the Emory risk score were collected for each patient: preoperative QRS, preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB), preoperative syncope, and degree of valve oversizing. Multivariable analysis of the individual variables within the scoring system to identify predictors of PPM placement was performed. The predictive discrimination of the risk score for the risk of PPM placement after TAVR was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that, of the 479 patients analyzed, 236 (49.3%) received balloon-expandable valves and 243 (50.7%) received self-expanding valves. Pacemaker rates were higher in patients receiving self-expanding valves than those receiving balloon-expandable valves (25.1% versus 16.1%, p=0.018). The Emory risk score showed a moderate correlation with pacemaker requirement in patients receiving each valve type, with AUC for balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves of 0.657 and 0.645, respectively. Of the four risk score components, preoperative RBBB was the only predictor of pacemaker requirement with an AUC of 0.615 for both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves. Conclusion. In our cohort, the Emory risk score had modest predictive utility for PPM insertion after balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVR. The risk score did not offer better discriminatory utility than that of preoperative RBBB alone. Understanding the determinants of PPM insertion after TAVR can better guide patient education and postoperative management. Hindawi 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7596463/ /pubmed/33149728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1807909 Text en Copyright © 2020 Alexander M. Spring et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spring, Alexander M.
Catalano, Michael A.
Prasad, Vikram
Rutkin, Bruce
Koss, Elana
Hartman, Alan
Yu, Pey-Jen
Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_full Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_fullStr Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_short Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_sort evaluating the validity of risk scoring in predicting pacemaker rates following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1807909
work_keys_str_mv AT springalexanderm evaluatingthevalidityofriskscoringinpredictingpacemakerratesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT catalanomichaela evaluatingthevalidityofriskscoringinpredictingpacemakerratesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT prasadvikram evaluatingthevalidityofriskscoringinpredictingpacemakerratesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT rutkinbruce evaluatingthevalidityofriskscoringinpredictingpacemakerratesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT kosselana evaluatingthevalidityofriskscoringinpredictingpacemakerratesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT hartmanalan evaluatingthevalidityofriskscoringinpredictingpacemakerratesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT yupeyjen evaluatingthevalidityofriskscoringinpredictingpacemakerratesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement