Cargando…
Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients
OBJECTIVES: A simple evaluation tool for patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could assist the physicians to triage COVID-19 patients effectively and rapidly. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of 5 early warning scores based on the admission data of critical COVID-...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.324 |
_version_ | 1783602144915488768 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Hai Yao, Ni Qiu, Yanru |
author_facet | Hu, Hai Yao, Ni Qiu, Yanru |
author_sort | Hu, Hai |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: A simple evaluation tool for patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could assist the physicians to triage COVID-19 patients effectively and rapidly. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of 5 early warning scores based on the admission data of critical COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Overall, medical records of 319 COVID-19 patients were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics on admission were used for calculating the Standardized Early Warning Score (SEWS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), National Early Warning Score2 (NEWS2), Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS), and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). Data on the outcomes (survival or death) were collected for each case and extracted for overall and subgroup analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the SEWS, NEWS, NEWS2, HEWS, and MEWS in predicting mortality were 0.841 (95% CI: 0.765-0.916), 0.809 (95% CI: 0.727-0.891), 0.809 (95% CI: 0.727-0.891), 0.821 (95% CI: 0.748-0.895), and 0.670 (95% CI: 0.573-0.767), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SEWS, NEWS, NEWS2, and HEWS demonstrated moderate discriminatory power and, therefore, offer potential utility as prognostic tools for screening severely ill COVID-19 patients. However, MEWS is not a good prognostic predictor for COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7596567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75965672020-11-02 Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients Hu, Hai Yao, Ni Qiu, Yanru Disaster Med Public Health Prep Original Research OBJECTIVES: A simple evaluation tool for patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could assist the physicians to triage COVID-19 patients effectively and rapidly. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of 5 early warning scores based on the admission data of critical COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Overall, medical records of 319 COVID-19 patients were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics on admission were used for calculating the Standardized Early Warning Score (SEWS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), National Early Warning Score2 (NEWS2), Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS), and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). Data on the outcomes (survival or death) were collected for each case and extracted for overall and subgroup analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the SEWS, NEWS, NEWS2, HEWS, and MEWS in predicting mortality were 0.841 (95% CI: 0.765-0.916), 0.809 (95% CI: 0.727-0.891), 0.809 (95% CI: 0.727-0.891), 0.821 (95% CI: 0.748-0.895), and 0.670 (95% CI: 0.573-0.767), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SEWS, NEWS, NEWS2, and HEWS demonstrated moderate discriminatory power and, therefore, offer potential utility as prognostic tools for screening severely ill COVID-19 patients. However, MEWS is not a good prognostic predictor for COVID-19. Cambridge University Press 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7596567/ /pubmed/32900406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.324 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hu, Hai Yao, Ni Qiu, Yanru Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients |
title | Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients |
title_full | Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients |
title_fullStr | Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients |
title_short | Predictive Value of 5 Early Warning Scores for Critical COVID-19 Patients |
title_sort | predictive value of 5 early warning scores for critical covid-19 patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huhai predictivevalueof5earlywarningscoresforcriticalcovid19patients AT yaoni predictivevalueof5earlywarningscoresforcriticalcovid19patients AT qiuyanru predictivevalueof5earlywarningscoresforcriticalcovid19patients |