Cargando…

Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Bowel preparation in children can be challenging. AIM: To describe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC) bowel preparation in children. METHODS: Phase 3, randomized, assessor-blinded, multicenter study of low-volume, divided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuffari, Carmen, Ciciora, Steven L, Ando, Masakazu, Boules, Mena, Croffie, Joseph M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6260
_version_ 1783602157591724032
author Cuffari, Carmen
Ciciora, Steven L
Ando, Masakazu
Boules, Mena
Croffie, Joseph M
author_facet Cuffari, Carmen
Ciciora, Steven L
Ando, Masakazu
Boules, Mena
Croffie, Joseph M
author_sort Cuffari, Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bowel preparation in children can be challenging. AIM: To describe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC) bowel preparation in children. METHODS: Phase 3, randomized, assessor-blinded, multicenter study of low-volume, divided dose SPMC enrolled children 9-16 years undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants 9-12 years were randomized 1:1:1 to SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, or polyethylene glycol (PEG). Participants 13-16 years were randomized 1:1 to SPMC 1 dose × 2 or PEG. PEG-based bowel preparations were administered per local protocol. Primary efficacy endpoint for quality of bowel preparation was responders (rating of ‘excellent’ or ‘good’) by modified Aronchick Scale. Secondary efficacy endpoint was participant’s tolerability and satisfaction from a 7-item questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: 78 participants were randomized, 48 were 9-12 years, 30 were 13-16 years. For the primary efficacy endpoint in 9-12 years, 50.0%, 87.5%, and 81.3% were responders for SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, and PEG groups, respectively. Responder rates for 13-16 years were 81.3% for SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 85.7% for PEG. Overall, 43.8% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 reported it was ‘very easy’ or ‘easy’ to drink, compared with 20.0% receiving PEG. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported by 45.5% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 63.0% receiving PEG. CONCLUSION: SPMC was an efficacious and safe for bowel preparation in children 9-16 years, with comparable efficacy to PEG. Tolerability for SPMC was higher compared to PEG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7596638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75966382020-11-10 Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial Cuffari, Carmen Ciciora, Steven L Ando, Masakazu Boules, Mena Croffie, Joseph M World J Gastroenterol Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: Bowel preparation in children can be challenging. AIM: To describe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC) bowel preparation in children. METHODS: Phase 3, randomized, assessor-blinded, multicenter study of low-volume, divided dose SPMC enrolled children 9-16 years undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants 9-12 years were randomized 1:1:1 to SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, or polyethylene glycol (PEG). Participants 13-16 years were randomized 1:1 to SPMC 1 dose × 2 or PEG. PEG-based bowel preparations were administered per local protocol. Primary efficacy endpoint for quality of bowel preparation was responders (rating of ‘excellent’ or ‘good’) by modified Aronchick Scale. Secondary efficacy endpoint was participant’s tolerability and satisfaction from a 7-item questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: 78 participants were randomized, 48 were 9-12 years, 30 were 13-16 years. For the primary efficacy endpoint in 9-12 years, 50.0%, 87.5%, and 81.3% were responders for SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, and PEG groups, respectively. Responder rates for 13-16 years were 81.3% for SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 85.7% for PEG. Overall, 43.8% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 reported it was ‘very easy’ or ‘easy’ to drink, compared with 20.0% receiving PEG. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported by 45.5% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 63.0% receiving PEG. CONCLUSION: SPMC was an efficacious and safe for bowel preparation in children 9-16 years, with comparable efficacy to PEG. Tolerability for SPMC was higher compared to PEG. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-10-28 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7596638/ /pubmed/33177798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6260 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Cuffari, Carmen
Ciciora, Steven L
Ando, Masakazu
Boules, Mena
Croffie, Joseph M
Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial
title Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial
title_full Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial
title_fullStr Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial
title_short Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial
title_sort pediatric bowel preparation: sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid vs polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6260
work_keys_str_mv AT cuffaricarmen pediatricbowelpreparationsodiumpicosulfatemagnesiumoxidecitricacidvspolyethyleneglycolarandomizedtrial
AT ciciorastevenl pediatricbowelpreparationsodiumpicosulfatemagnesiumoxidecitricacidvspolyethyleneglycolarandomizedtrial
AT andomasakazu pediatricbowelpreparationsodiumpicosulfatemagnesiumoxidecitricacidvspolyethyleneglycolarandomizedtrial
AT boulesmena pediatricbowelpreparationsodiumpicosulfatemagnesiumoxidecitricacidvspolyethyleneglycolarandomizedtrial
AT croffiejosephm pediatricbowelpreparationsodiumpicosulfatemagnesiumoxidecitricacidvspolyethyleneglycolarandomizedtrial