Cargando…

Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults

When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurthen, Ira, Meyer, Martin, Schlesewsky, Matthias, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177981
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513
_version_ 1783602178346188800
author Kurthen, Ira
Meyer, Martin
Schlesewsky, Matthias
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
author_facet Kurthen, Ira
Meyer, Martin
Schlesewsky, Matthias
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
author_sort Kurthen, Ira
collection PubMed
description When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Specifically, we tested whether hearing thresholds, working memory, inhibition, and individual alpha frequency would predict event-related potential amplitudes in response to classic psycholinguistic manipulations at the sentence level. Twenty-nine healthy older adults (age range 61–76 years) listened to English sentences containing reduced relative clauses and object-relative clauses while their electroencephalogram was recorded. We found that hearing thresholds and working memory predicted P600 amplitudes early during reduced relative clause processing, while individual alpha frequency predicted P600 amplitudes at a later point in time. The results suggest that participants with better hearing and larger working memory capacity simultaneously activated both the preferred and the dispreferred interpretation of reduced relative clauses, while participants with worse hearing and smaller working memory capacity only activated the preferred interpretation. They also suggest that participants with a higher individual alpha frequency had a higher likelihood of successfully reanalysing the sentence toward the reduced relative clause reading than participants with a lower individual alpha frequency. By contrast, we found no relationship between object-relative clause processing and working memory or hearing thresholds. Taken together, the results support the view that older adults employ different strategies during auditory sentence processing dependent on their hearing and cognitive abilities and that there is no single ability that uniformly predicts sentence processing outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7596743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75967432020-11-10 Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults Kurthen, Ira Meyer, Martin Schlesewsky, Matthias Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Front Neurosci Neuroscience When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Specifically, we tested whether hearing thresholds, working memory, inhibition, and individual alpha frequency would predict event-related potential amplitudes in response to classic psycholinguistic manipulations at the sentence level. Twenty-nine healthy older adults (age range 61–76 years) listened to English sentences containing reduced relative clauses and object-relative clauses while their electroencephalogram was recorded. We found that hearing thresholds and working memory predicted P600 amplitudes early during reduced relative clause processing, while individual alpha frequency predicted P600 amplitudes at a later point in time. The results suggest that participants with better hearing and larger working memory capacity simultaneously activated both the preferred and the dispreferred interpretation of reduced relative clauses, while participants with worse hearing and smaller working memory capacity only activated the preferred interpretation. They also suggest that participants with a higher individual alpha frequency had a higher likelihood of successfully reanalysing the sentence toward the reduced relative clause reading than participants with a lower individual alpha frequency. By contrast, we found no relationship between object-relative clause processing and working memory or hearing thresholds. Taken together, the results support the view that older adults employ different strategies during auditory sentence processing dependent on their hearing and cognitive abilities and that there is no single ability that uniformly predicts sentence processing outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7596743/ /pubmed/33177981 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kurthen, Meyer, Schlesewsky and Bornkessel-Schlesewsky. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kurthen, Ira
Meyer, Martin
Schlesewsky, Matthias
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_full Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_fullStr Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_short Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_sort individual differences in peripheral hearing and cognition reveal sentence processing differences in healthy older adults
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177981
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513
work_keys_str_mv AT kurthenira individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
AT meyermartin individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
AT schlesewskymatthias individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
AT bornkesselschlesewskyina individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults