Cargando…
Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Speci...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177981 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513 |
_version_ | 1783602178346188800 |
---|---|
author | Kurthen, Ira Meyer, Martin Schlesewsky, Matthias Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina |
author_facet | Kurthen, Ira Meyer, Martin Schlesewsky, Matthias Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina |
author_sort | Kurthen, Ira |
collection | PubMed |
description | When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Specifically, we tested whether hearing thresholds, working memory, inhibition, and individual alpha frequency would predict event-related potential amplitudes in response to classic psycholinguistic manipulations at the sentence level. Twenty-nine healthy older adults (age range 61–76 years) listened to English sentences containing reduced relative clauses and object-relative clauses while their electroencephalogram was recorded. We found that hearing thresholds and working memory predicted P600 amplitudes early during reduced relative clause processing, while individual alpha frequency predicted P600 amplitudes at a later point in time. The results suggest that participants with better hearing and larger working memory capacity simultaneously activated both the preferred and the dispreferred interpretation of reduced relative clauses, while participants with worse hearing and smaller working memory capacity only activated the preferred interpretation. They also suggest that participants with a higher individual alpha frequency had a higher likelihood of successfully reanalysing the sentence toward the reduced relative clause reading than participants with a lower individual alpha frequency. By contrast, we found no relationship between object-relative clause processing and working memory or hearing thresholds. Taken together, the results support the view that older adults employ different strategies during auditory sentence processing dependent on their hearing and cognitive abilities and that there is no single ability that uniformly predicts sentence processing outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7596743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75967432020-11-10 Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults Kurthen, Ira Meyer, Martin Schlesewsky, Matthias Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Front Neurosci Neuroscience When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Specifically, we tested whether hearing thresholds, working memory, inhibition, and individual alpha frequency would predict event-related potential amplitudes in response to classic psycholinguistic manipulations at the sentence level. Twenty-nine healthy older adults (age range 61–76 years) listened to English sentences containing reduced relative clauses and object-relative clauses while their electroencephalogram was recorded. We found that hearing thresholds and working memory predicted P600 amplitudes early during reduced relative clause processing, while individual alpha frequency predicted P600 amplitudes at a later point in time. The results suggest that participants with better hearing and larger working memory capacity simultaneously activated both the preferred and the dispreferred interpretation of reduced relative clauses, while participants with worse hearing and smaller working memory capacity only activated the preferred interpretation. They also suggest that participants with a higher individual alpha frequency had a higher likelihood of successfully reanalysing the sentence toward the reduced relative clause reading than participants with a lower individual alpha frequency. By contrast, we found no relationship between object-relative clause processing and working memory or hearing thresholds. Taken together, the results support the view that older adults employ different strategies during auditory sentence processing dependent on their hearing and cognitive abilities and that there is no single ability that uniformly predicts sentence processing outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7596743/ /pubmed/33177981 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kurthen, Meyer, Schlesewsky and Bornkessel-Schlesewsky. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kurthen, Ira Meyer, Martin Schlesewsky, Matthias Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults |
title | Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults |
title_full | Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults |
title_fullStr | Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults |
title_short | Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults |
title_sort | individual differences in peripheral hearing and cognition reveal sentence processing differences in healthy older adults |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177981 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kurthenira individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults AT meyermartin individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults AT schlesewskymatthias individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults AT bornkesselschlesewskyina individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults |