Cargando…

Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND: Pleural effusion (PE) can be divided into benign pleural effusion (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). There is no consensus on the identification of lung cancer-associated MPE using the optimal cut-off levels from five common tumor biomarkers (CEA, CYFRA 21-1, CA125, SCC-Ag, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hai, Li, Changhui, Hu, Fang, Zhang, Xueyan, Shen, Yinchen, Chen, Yuqing, Li, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01557-z
_version_ 1783602219863506944
author Zhang, Hai
Li, Changhui
Hu, Fang
Zhang, Xueyan
Shen, Yinchen
Chen, Yuqing
Li, Feng
author_facet Zhang, Hai
Li, Changhui
Hu, Fang
Zhang, Xueyan
Shen, Yinchen
Chen, Yuqing
Li, Feng
author_sort Zhang, Hai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pleural effusion (PE) can be divided into benign pleural effusion (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). There is no consensus on the identification of lung cancer-associated MPE using the optimal cut-off levels from five common tumor biomarkers (CEA, CYFRA 21-1, CA125, SCC-Ag, and NSE). Therefore, we aimed to find indicators for the auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer-associated MPE by analyzing and then validating the optimal threshold levels of these biomarkers in pleural fluid (PF) and serum, as well as the PF/serum ratio. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study has two sets of patients, i.e. the training set and the test set. In the training set, 348 patients with PE, between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017, were divided into BPE and MPE based on the cytological diagnosis. Subsequently, the optimal cut-off levels of tumor biomarkers were analyzed. In the test set, the diagnostic compliance rate was verified with 271 patients with PE from January 1, 2018 to July 31, 2019 to evaluate the auxiliary diagnostic value of the aforementioned indicators. RESULT: In the training set, PF CEA at the cut-off value of 5.23 ng/ml was the most effective indicator for MPE compared with other tumor biomarkers (all p < 0.001). In the test set, PF CEA at the cut-off value of 5.23 ng/ml showed the highest sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, positive and negative predictive value among other tumor biomarkers, which were 99.0%, 69.1%, 91.6%, 90.7%, and 95.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PF CEA at the cut-off level of 5.23 ng/ml was the most effective indicator for identifying lung cancer-associated MPE among the five common tumor biomarkers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7596935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75969352020-10-30 Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion Zhang, Hai Li, Changhui Hu, Fang Zhang, Xueyan Shen, Yinchen Chen, Yuqing Li, Feng Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Pleural effusion (PE) can be divided into benign pleural effusion (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). There is no consensus on the identification of lung cancer-associated MPE using the optimal cut-off levels from five common tumor biomarkers (CEA, CYFRA 21-1, CA125, SCC-Ag, and NSE). Therefore, we aimed to find indicators for the auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer-associated MPE by analyzing and then validating the optimal threshold levels of these biomarkers in pleural fluid (PF) and serum, as well as the PF/serum ratio. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study has two sets of patients, i.e. the training set and the test set. In the training set, 348 patients with PE, between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017, were divided into BPE and MPE based on the cytological diagnosis. Subsequently, the optimal cut-off levels of tumor biomarkers were analyzed. In the test set, the diagnostic compliance rate was verified with 271 patients with PE from January 1, 2018 to July 31, 2019 to evaluate the auxiliary diagnostic value of the aforementioned indicators. RESULT: In the training set, PF CEA at the cut-off value of 5.23 ng/ml was the most effective indicator for MPE compared with other tumor biomarkers (all p < 0.001). In the test set, PF CEA at the cut-off value of 5.23 ng/ml showed the highest sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, positive and negative predictive value among other tumor biomarkers, which were 99.0%, 69.1%, 91.6%, 90.7%, and 95.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PF CEA at the cut-off level of 5.23 ng/ml was the most effective indicator for identifying lung cancer-associated MPE among the five common tumor biomarkers. BioMed Central 2020-10-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7596935/ /pubmed/33121490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01557-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Hai
Li, Changhui
Hu, Fang
Zhang, Xueyan
Shen, Yinchen
Chen, Yuqing
Li, Feng
Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion
title Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion
title_full Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion
title_fullStr Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion
title_full_unstemmed Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion
title_short Auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion
title_sort auxiliary diagnostic value of tumor biomarkers in pleural fluid for lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01557-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghai auxiliarydiagnosticvalueoftumorbiomarkersinpleuralfluidforlungcancerassociatedmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT lichanghui auxiliarydiagnosticvalueoftumorbiomarkersinpleuralfluidforlungcancerassociatedmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT hufang auxiliarydiagnosticvalueoftumorbiomarkersinpleuralfluidforlungcancerassociatedmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT zhangxueyan auxiliarydiagnosticvalueoftumorbiomarkersinpleuralfluidforlungcancerassociatedmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT shenyinchen auxiliarydiagnosticvalueoftumorbiomarkersinpleuralfluidforlungcancerassociatedmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT chenyuqing auxiliarydiagnosticvalueoftumorbiomarkersinpleuralfluidforlungcancerassociatedmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT lifeng auxiliarydiagnosticvalueoftumorbiomarkersinpleuralfluidforlungcancerassociatedmalignantpleuraleffusion