Cargando…
Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are increasingly prevalent in environmental health due to their ability to synthesize evidence while reducing bias. Different systematic review methods have been developed by the US National Toxicology Program’s Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT), the U...
Autores principales: | Eick, Stephanie M., Goin, Dana E., Chartres, Nicholas, Lam, Juleen, Woodruff, Tracey J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7596989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01490-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Radke, Elizabeth G., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures
por: Bero, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions
por: Norris, Susan L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)