Cargando…
Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method
Defeathering with rosin results in rosin residue in duck skin, which may present as potential risk to human health. Dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) is a major component of rosin. An indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for determination of DHAA in duck skin. A set...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.031 |
_version_ | 1783602417603969024 |
---|---|
author | Qiu, Xinyuan Ma, Jingjing Li, Pengpeng Geng, Zhiming Sun, Chong Wang, Daoying Xu, Weimin |
author_facet | Qiu, Xinyuan Ma, Jingjing Li, Pengpeng Geng, Zhiming Sun, Chong Wang, Daoying Xu, Weimin |
author_sort | Qiu, Xinyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Defeathering with rosin results in rosin residue in duck skin, which may present as potential risk to human health. Dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) is a major component of rosin. An indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for determination of DHAA in duck skin. A set of parameters was optimized, including coating antigen concentration, dilution of antiserum, dilution of HRP-IgG antibody, incubation time, and temperature for antigen reaction with antiserum. The indirect competitive ELISA yielded an excellent specificity against DHAA with low cross-reactivity toward other resin acids. The limit of detection and the working concentration range of DHAA in duck skin were 16.4 ng/g and from 40 to 8,060 ng/g, respectively. The indirect competitive ELISA was applied to the determination of DHAA in duck skin samples spiked with DHAA at different contents, and recoveries were found between 78.2 and 97.2%. Finally, DHAA contents in 32 duck samples were quantified by the indirect competitive ELISA and high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector (HPLC-FLD) method. No significant difference was found between DHAA concentrations from indirect competitive ELISA and HPLC-FLD method for all samples, which indicated the indirect competitive ELISA established in this article was of the same accuracy as the HPLC-FLD method. The indirect competitive ELISA was simple, rapid, and reliable, which could be used to identify the duck carcasses defeathered with rosin in the market. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7597691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75976912020-11-03 Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method Qiu, Xinyuan Ma, Jingjing Li, Pengpeng Geng, Zhiming Sun, Chong Wang, Daoying Xu, Weimin Poult Sci Microbiology and Food Safety Defeathering with rosin results in rosin residue in duck skin, which may present as potential risk to human health. Dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) is a major component of rosin. An indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for determination of DHAA in duck skin. A set of parameters was optimized, including coating antigen concentration, dilution of antiserum, dilution of HRP-IgG antibody, incubation time, and temperature for antigen reaction with antiserum. The indirect competitive ELISA yielded an excellent specificity against DHAA with low cross-reactivity toward other resin acids. The limit of detection and the working concentration range of DHAA in duck skin were 16.4 ng/g and from 40 to 8,060 ng/g, respectively. The indirect competitive ELISA was applied to the determination of DHAA in duck skin samples spiked with DHAA at different contents, and recoveries were found between 78.2 and 97.2%. Finally, DHAA contents in 32 duck samples were quantified by the indirect competitive ELISA and high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector (HPLC-FLD) method. No significant difference was found between DHAA concentrations from indirect competitive ELISA and HPLC-FLD method for all samples, which indicated the indirect competitive ELISA established in this article was of the same accuracy as the HPLC-FLD method. The indirect competitive ELISA was simple, rapid, and reliable, which could be used to identify the duck carcasses defeathered with rosin in the market. Elsevier 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7597691/ /pubmed/32475463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.031 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Microbiology and Food Safety Qiu, Xinyuan Ma, Jingjing Li, Pengpeng Geng, Zhiming Sun, Chong Wang, Daoying Xu, Weimin Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method |
title | Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method |
title_full | Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method |
title_fullStr | Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method |
title_short | Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method |
title_sort | development of indirect competitive elisa for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the hplc method |
topic | Microbiology and Food Safety |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiuxinyuan developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod AT majingjing developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod AT lipengpeng developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod AT gengzhiming developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod AT sunchong developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod AT wangdaoying developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod AT xuweimin developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod |