Cargando…

Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method

Defeathering with rosin results in rosin residue in duck skin, which may present as potential risk to human health. Dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) is a major component of rosin. An indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for determination of DHAA in duck skin. A set...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Xinyuan, Ma, Jingjing, Li, Pengpeng, Geng, Zhiming, Sun, Chong, Wang, Daoying, Xu, Weimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.031
_version_ 1783602417603969024
author Qiu, Xinyuan
Ma, Jingjing
Li, Pengpeng
Geng, Zhiming
Sun, Chong
Wang, Daoying
Xu, Weimin
author_facet Qiu, Xinyuan
Ma, Jingjing
Li, Pengpeng
Geng, Zhiming
Sun, Chong
Wang, Daoying
Xu, Weimin
author_sort Qiu, Xinyuan
collection PubMed
description Defeathering with rosin results in rosin residue in duck skin, which may present as potential risk to human health. Dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) is a major component of rosin. An indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for determination of DHAA in duck skin. A set of parameters was optimized, including coating antigen concentration, dilution of antiserum, dilution of HRP-IgG antibody, incubation time, and temperature for antigen reaction with antiserum. The indirect competitive ELISA yielded an excellent specificity against DHAA with low cross-reactivity toward other resin acids. The limit of detection and the working concentration range of DHAA in duck skin were 16.4 ng/g and from 40 to 8,060 ng/g, respectively. The indirect competitive ELISA was applied to the determination of DHAA in duck skin samples spiked with DHAA at different contents, and recoveries were found between 78.2 and 97.2%. Finally, DHAA contents in 32 duck samples were quantified by the indirect competitive ELISA and high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector (HPLC-FLD) method. No significant difference was found between DHAA concentrations from indirect competitive ELISA and HPLC-FLD method for all samples, which indicated the indirect competitive ELISA established in this article was of the same accuracy as the HPLC-FLD method. The indirect competitive ELISA was simple, rapid, and reliable, which could be used to identify the duck carcasses defeathered with rosin in the market.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7597691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75976912020-11-03 Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method Qiu, Xinyuan Ma, Jingjing Li, Pengpeng Geng, Zhiming Sun, Chong Wang, Daoying Xu, Weimin Poult Sci Microbiology and Food Safety Defeathering with rosin results in rosin residue in duck skin, which may present as potential risk to human health. Dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) is a major component of rosin. An indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for determination of DHAA in duck skin. A set of parameters was optimized, including coating antigen concentration, dilution of antiserum, dilution of HRP-IgG antibody, incubation time, and temperature for antigen reaction with antiserum. The indirect competitive ELISA yielded an excellent specificity against DHAA with low cross-reactivity toward other resin acids. The limit of detection and the working concentration range of DHAA in duck skin were 16.4 ng/g and from 40 to 8,060 ng/g, respectively. The indirect competitive ELISA was applied to the determination of DHAA in duck skin samples spiked with DHAA at different contents, and recoveries were found between 78.2 and 97.2%. Finally, DHAA contents in 32 duck samples were quantified by the indirect competitive ELISA and high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector (HPLC-FLD) method. No significant difference was found between DHAA concentrations from indirect competitive ELISA and HPLC-FLD method for all samples, which indicated the indirect competitive ELISA established in this article was of the same accuracy as the HPLC-FLD method. The indirect competitive ELISA was simple, rapid, and reliable, which could be used to identify the duck carcasses defeathered with rosin in the market. Elsevier 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7597691/ /pubmed/32475463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.031 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Microbiology and Food Safety
Qiu, Xinyuan
Ma, Jingjing
Li, Pengpeng
Geng, Zhiming
Sun, Chong
Wang, Daoying
Xu, Weimin
Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method
title Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method
title_full Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method
title_fullStr Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method
title_full_unstemmed Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method
title_short Development of indirect competitive ELISA for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the HPLC method
title_sort development of indirect competitive elisa for determination of dehydroabietic acid in duck skin and comparison with the hplc method
topic Microbiology and Food Safety
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.031
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuxinyuan developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod
AT majingjing developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod
AT lipengpeng developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod
AT gengzhiming developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod
AT sunchong developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod
AT wangdaoying developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod
AT xuweimin developmentofindirectcompetitiveelisafordeterminationofdehydroabieticacidinduckskinandcomparisonwiththehplcmethod