Cargando…

Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: Inflammation-based markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have recently been used as prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine whether NLR and PLR may predict response to yttrium-90 transarterial rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoneoka, Grant, Bozhilov, Kliment, Wong, Linda L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134551
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.57
_version_ 1783602451641794560
author Yoneoka, Grant
Bozhilov, Kliment
Wong, Linda L.
author_facet Yoneoka, Grant
Bozhilov, Kliment
Wong, Linda L.
author_sort Yoneoka, Grant
collection PubMed
description AIM: Inflammation-based markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have recently been used as prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine whether NLR and PLR may predict response to yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as primary treatment for HCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of HCC cases (1994–2019) and selected patients who received TARE as primary treatment (n = 42). Laboratory studies were used to calculate NLR and PLR. Response to TARE was determined using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). Patients were classified as non-responders (stable or progressive disease) or responders (partial or complete response) to treatment based on mRECIST. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a pre-treatment NLR cutoff of ≥ 2.83 and a pre-treatment PLR cutoff of ≥ 83 for predicting non-response to treatment. Pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was the only significant predictor of non-response to TARE in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 7.83, P = 0.036). On time to progression analysis, both pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 and pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 were associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression at 6 months post-treatment (43.6% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.014, log-rank) and (38.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.010, log-rank), respectively. CONCLUSION: NLR confers prognostic value and may be superior to PLR in determining response to TARE as primary treatment for HCC. Future studies are necessary to validate these findings in a larger cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7597831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75978312020-10-30 Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma Yoneoka, Grant Bozhilov, Kliment Wong, Linda L. Hepatoma Res Article AIM: Inflammation-based markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have recently been used as prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine whether NLR and PLR may predict response to yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as primary treatment for HCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of HCC cases (1994–2019) and selected patients who received TARE as primary treatment (n = 42). Laboratory studies were used to calculate NLR and PLR. Response to TARE was determined using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). Patients were classified as non-responders (stable or progressive disease) or responders (partial or complete response) to treatment based on mRECIST. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a pre-treatment NLR cutoff of ≥ 2.83 and a pre-treatment PLR cutoff of ≥ 83 for predicting non-response to treatment. Pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was the only significant predictor of non-response to TARE in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 7.83, P = 0.036). On time to progression analysis, both pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 and pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 were associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression at 6 months post-treatment (43.6% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.014, log-rank) and (38.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.010, log-rank), respectively. CONCLUSION: NLR confers prognostic value and may be superior to PLR in determining response to TARE as primary treatment for HCC. Future studies are necessary to validate these findings in a larger cohort. 2020-10-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7597831/ /pubmed/33134551 http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.57 Text en This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Yoneoka, Grant
Bozhilov, Kliment
Wong, Linda L.
Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
title Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134551
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.57
work_keys_str_mv AT yoneokagrant prognosticabilityofinflammationbasedmarkersinradioembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT bozhilovkliment prognosticabilityofinflammationbasedmarkersinradioembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wonglindal prognosticabilityofinflammationbasedmarkersinradioembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinoma