Cargando…

Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products

BACKGROUND: Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers are routinely used for correction of soft-tissue volume loss and facial rejuvenation. Product differentiation has primarily been based on the rheologic parameter known as elastic modulus (G′), although other physicochemical properties are being explored...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fagien, Steven, Bertucci, Vince, von Grote, Erika, Mashburn, Jay H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005429
_version_ 1783602482643992576
author Fagien, Steven
Bertucci, Vince
von Grote, Erika
Mashburn, Jay H.
author_facet Fagien, Steven
Bertucci, Vince
von Grote, Erika
Mashburn, Jay H.
author_sort Fagien, Steven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers are routinely used for correction of soft-tissue volume loss and facial rejuvenation. Product differentiation has primarily been based on the rheologic parameter known as elastic modulus (G′), although other physicochemical properties are being explored to characterize potential product performance. As clinical data regarding product performance are lacking, the practical experience of injectors provides a valuable bridge in the knowledge gap between product rheologic data and product use. METHODS: Rheologic and physicochemical measurements (swelling factor and cohesion) were collected for 18 products. To observe the impact of G′ and hyaluronic acid concentration on swelling factor and cohesion, proportional relationships were evaluated. Contributing authors were queried regarding their G′-based selection of products when considering skin quality, degree of correction, injection depth, and anatomical location. RESULTS: Relationships were observable between G′ and swelling factor and G′ and cohesion only when limited to products manufactured by the same crosslinking technology and the same concentration. No relationship between isolated hyaluronic acid concentration and swelling factor or cohesion was apparent. Although rheological parameters and the assumptions of ex vivo data translating to in vivo performance are oftentimes not completely aligned, in the clinical experience of the authors, in general, higher G′ products are better suited for thicker skin and deeper injection planes, whereas lower G′ products are better for more superficial planes, although exceptions to these trends are also made based on technical experience. CONCLUSIONS: While rheologic and physicochemical characteristics can vary widely between products and the methods and measurements of these parameters are often difficult to correlate, G′ represents a useful and consistent parameter for product differentiation. Understanding how to select products based on G′ is valuable knowledge for customizing injection plans and contributes to an optimal aesthetic outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7597953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75979532020-11-03 Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products Fagien, Steven Bertucci, Vince von Grote, Erika Mashburn, Jay H. Plast Reconstr Surg Cosmetic: Original Articles BACKGROUND: Injectable hyaluronic acid fillers are routinely used for correction of soft-tissue volume loss and facial rejuvenation. Product differentiation has primarily been based on the rheologic parameter known as elastic modulus (G′), although other physicochemical properties are being explored to characterize potential product performance. As clinical data regarding product performance are lacking, the practical experience of injectors provides a valuable bridge in the knowledge gap between product rheologic data and product use. METHODS: Rheologic and physicochemical measurements (swelling factor and cohesion) were collected for 18 products. To observe the impact of G′ and hyaluronic acid concentration on swelling factor and cohesion, proportional relationships were evaluated. Contributing authors were queried regarding their G′-based selection of products when considering skin quality, degree of correction, injection depth, and anatomical location. RESULTS: Relationships were observable between G′ and swelling factor and G′ and cohesion only when limited to products manufactured by the same crosslinking technology and the same concentration. No relationship between isolated hyaluronic acid concentration and swelling factor or cohesion was apparent. Although rheological parameters and the assumptions of ex vivo data translating to in vivo performance are oftentimes not completely aligned, in the clinical experience of the authors, in general, higher G′ products are better suited for thicker skin and deeper injection planes, whereas lower G′ products are better for more superficial planes, although exceptions to these trends are also made based on technical experience. CONCLUSIONS: While rheologic and physicochemical characteristics can vary widely between products and the methods and measurements of these parameters are often difficult to correlate, G′ represents a useful and consistent parameter for product differentiation. Understanding how to select products based on G′ is valuable knowledge for customizing injection plans and contributes to an optimal aesthetic outcome. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-04 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7597953/ /pubmed/30921116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005429 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic: Original Articles
Fagien, Steven
Bertucci, Vince
von Grote, Erika
Mashburn, Jay H.
Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products
title Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products
title_full Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products
title_fullStr Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products
title_full_unstemmed Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products
title_short Rheologic and Physicochemical Properties Used to Differentiate Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Filler Products
title_sort rheologic and physicochemical properties used to differentiate injectable hyaluronic acid filler products
topic Cosmetic: Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005429
work_keys_str_mv AT fagiensteven rheologicandphysicochemicalpropertiesusedtodifferentiateinjectablehyaluronicacidfillerproducts
AT bertuccivince rheologicandphysicochemicalpropertiesusedtodifferentiateinjectablehyaluronicacidfillerproducts
AT vongroteerika rheologicandphysicochemicalpropertiesusedtodifferentiateinjectablehyaluronicacidfillerproducts
AT mashburnjayh rheologicandphysicochemicalpropertiesusedtodifferentiateinjectablehyaluronicacidfillerproducts