Cargando…

Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels

Understanding the air temperature distribution, ammonia (NH(3)) and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) levels in poultry housing systems are crucial to poultry health, welfare, and productivity. In this study, 4 Intelligent Portable Monitoring Units and 7 temperature sensors were installed inside and between th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, W., Xiong, Y., Gates, R.S., Wang, Y., Koelkebeck, K.W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32731975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.009
_version_ 1783602494369169408
author Zheng, W.
Xiong, Y.
Gates, R.S.
Wang, Y.
Koelkebeck, K.W.
author_facet Zheng, W.
Xiong, Y.
Gates, R.S.
Wang, Y.
Koelkebeck, K.W.
author_sort Zheng, W.
collection PubMed
description Understanding the air temperature distribution, ammonia (NH(3)) and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) levels in poultry housing systems are crucial to poultry health, welfare, and productivity. In this study, 4 Intelligent Portable Monitoring Units and 7 temperature sensors were installed inside and between the cages and above 2 minimum ventilation fans of a commercial stacked-deck cage laying hen house in the Midwest United States (425,000 laying hens) to continuously monitor the interior environment over a 6-month period. During cold conditions (March 12th–May 22nd), there was a variation noted, with barn center temperatures consistently being highest in the longitudinal and lateral direction (P < 0.001) and the top floor deck warmer than the bottom floor (P < 0.05). During hotter conditions (May 23rd–July 26th), the interior thermal environment was more uniform than during the winter, resulting in a difference only in the longitudinal direction. The daily CO(2) and NH(3) concentrations were 400 to 4,981 ppm and 0 to 42.3 ppm among the 4 sampling locations, respectively. Both CO(2) and NH(3) decreased linearly with increasing outside temperatures. The mean NH(3) and CO(2) concentrations varied with sampling locations and with the outside temperatures (P < 0.001). For CO(2), the minimum ventilation sidewall had lower values than those measured in the barn’s center (P < 0.05) during cold weather, while the barn center and the manure room sidewall consistently measured the highest concentrations during warmer weather (P < 0.05). For NH(3), the tunnel ventilation inlet end consistently had the lowest daily concentrations, whereas the in-cage and manure drying tunnel sidewall locations measured the highest concentrations (P < 0.001). Higher NH(3) and CO(2) concentrations were recorded within the cage than in the cage aisle (P < 0.05). The highest NH(3) concentration of 42 ppm was recorded above the minimum exhaust fan adjacent to the manure drying tunnel, which indicated that higher pressure (back pressure) in the manure drying tunnel allowed air leakage back into the production area through nonoperating sidewall fan shutters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7597998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75979982020-11-03 Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels Zheng, W. Xiong, Y. Gates, R.S. Wang, Y. Koelkebeck, K.W. Poult Sci Management and Production Understanding the air temperature distribution, ammonia (NH(3)) and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) levels in poultry housing systems are crucial to poultry health, welfare, and productivity. In this study, 4 Intelligent Portable Monitoring Units and 7 temperature sensors were installed inside and between the cages and above 2 minimum ventilation fans of a commercial stacked-deck cage laying hen house in the Midwest United States (425,000 laying hens) to continuously monitor the interior environment over a 6-month period. During cold conditions (March 12th–May 22nd), there was a variation noted, with barn center temperatures consistently being highest in the longitudinal and lateral direction (P < 0.001) and the top floor deck warmer than the bottom floor (P < 0.05). During hotter conditions (May 23rd–July 26th), the interior thermal environment was more uniform than during the winter, resulting in a difference only in the longitudinal direction. The daily CO(2) and NH(3) concentrations were 400 to 4,981 ppm and 0 to 42.3 ppm among the 4 sampling locations, respectively. Both CO(2) and NH(3) decreased linearly with increasing outside temperatures. The mean NH(3) and CO(2) concentrations varied with sampling locations and with the outside temperatures (P < 0.001). For CO(2), the minimum ventilation sidewall had lower values than those measured in the barn’s center (P < 0.05) during cold weather, while the barn center and the manure room sidewall consistently measured the highest concentrations during warmer weather (P < 0.05). For NH(3), the tunnel ventilation inlet end consistently had the lowest daily concentrations, whereas the in-cage and manure drying tunnel sidewall locations measured the highest concentrations (P < 0.001). Higher NH(3) and CO(2) concentrations were recorded within the cage than in the cage aisle (P < 0.05). The highest NH(3) concentration of 42 ppm was recorded above the minimum exhaust fan adjacent to the manure drying tunnel, which indicated that higher pressure (back pressure) in the manure drying tunnel allowed air leakage back into the production area through nonoperating sidewall fan shutters. Elsevier 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7597998/ /pubmed/32731975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.009 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Management and Production
Zheng, W.
Xiong, Y.
Gates, R.S.
Wang, Y.
Koelkebeck, K.W.
Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels
title Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels
title_full Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels
title_fullStr Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels
title_full_unstemmed Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels
title_short Air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels
title_sort air temperature, carbon dioxide, and ammonia assessment inside a commercial cage layer barn with manure-drying tunnels
topic Management and Production
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32731975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.009
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengw airtemperaturecarbondioxideandammoniaassessmentinsideacommercialcagelayerbarnwithmanuredryingtunnels
AT xiongy airtemperaturecarbondioxideandammoniaassessmentinsideacommercialcagelayerbarnwithmanuredryingtunnels
AT gatesrs airtemperaturecarbondioxideandammoniaassessmentinsideacommercialcagelayerbarnwithmanuredryingtunnels
AT wangy airtemperaturecarbondioxideandammoniaassessmentinsideacommercialcagelayerbarnwithmanuredryingtunnels
AT koelkebeckkw airtemperaturecarbondioxideandammoniaassessmentinsideacommercialcagelayerbarnwithmanuredryingtunnels