Cargando…

Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods

Understanding energy partitioning in broiler breeders is needed to provide efficiency indicators for breeding purposes. This study compared 4 nonlinear models partitioning metabolizable energy (ME) intake to BW, average daily gain (ADG), and egg mass (EM) and described the effect of BW and rearing p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Klein, S.A.S., Bédécarrats, G.Y., Zuidhof, M.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.016
_version_ 1783602495061229568
author van der Klein, S.A.S.
Bédécarrats, G.Y.
Zuidhof, M.J.
author_facet van der Klein, S.A.S.
Bédécarrats, G.Y.
Zuidhof, M.J.
author_sort van der Klein, S.A.S.
collection PubMed
description Understanding energy partitioning in broiler breeders is needed to provide efficiency indicators for breeding purposes. This study compared 4 nonlinear models partitioning metabolizable energy (ME) intake to BW, average daily gain (ADG), and egg mass (EM) and described the effect of BW and rearing photoperiod on energy partitioning. Ross 708 broiler breeders (n = 180) were kept in 6 pens, controlling individual BW of free run birds with precision feeding stations. Half of the birds in each chamber were assigned to the breeder-recommended target BW curve (Standard) or to an accelerated target BW curve reaching the 21-week BW at week 18 (High). Pairs of chambers were randomly assigned to 8L:16D, 10L:14D, or 12L:12D rearing photoschedules and photostimulated with 16L:8D at week 21. Model [I] was: MEI(d) = a × BW(b) + c × ADG × BW(d) + e × EM + ε, where MEI(d) = daily ME intake (kcal/day); BW in kg; ADG in g/day; EM in g/day. Models [II–IV] were nonlinear mixed versions of model [I] and included individual [II], age-related [III], or both individual and age-related [IV] random terms to explain these sources of variation in maintenance requirement (a). Differences were reported as significant at P ≤ 0.05. The mean square error was 2,111, 1,532, 1,668, and 46 for models [I–IV] respectively, inferring extra random variation was explained by incorporating 1 or 2 random terms. Estimated ME partitioned to maintenance [IV] was 130.6 ± 1.15 kcal/kg(0.58), and the ME requirement for ADG and EM were 0.63 ± 0.03 kcal/g/kg(0.54) and 2.42 ± 0.04 kcal/g, respectively. During the laying period, maintenance estimates were 124.2 and 137.4 kcal/kg(0.58) for standard and high BW treatment, and 130.7, 132.2, and 129.5 kcal/kg(0.58) for the 8L:16D, 10L:14D, or 12L:12D treatments, respectively. Although hens on the standard BW treatment with a 12L:12D rearing photoschedule were most energetically conservative, their reproductive performance was the poorest. Model IV provided a new biologically sound method for estimation of life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders including an age-related random term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7598000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75980002020-11-03 Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods van der Klein, S.A.S. Bédécarrats, G.Y. Zuidhof, M.J. Poult Sci Metabolism and Nutrition Understanding energy partitioning in broiler breeders is needed to provide efficiency indicators for breeding purposes. This study compared 4 nonlinear models partitioning metabolizable energy (ME) intake to BW, average daily gain (ADG), and egg mass (EM) and described the effect of BW and rearing photoperiod on energy partitioning. Ross 708 broiler breeders (n = 180) were kept in 6 pens, controlling individual BW of free run birds with precision feeding stations. Half of the birds in each chamber were assigned to the breeder-recommended target BW curve (Standard) or to an accelerated target BW curve reaching the 21-week BW at week 18 (High). Pairs of chambers were randomly assigned to 8L:16D, 10L:14D, or 12L:12D rearing photoschedules and photostimulated with 16L:8D at week 21. Model [I] was: MEI(d) = a × BW(b) + c × ADG × BW(d) + e × EM + ε, where MEI(d) = daily ME intake (kcal/day); BW in kg; ADG in g/day; EM in g/day. Models [II–IV] were nonlinear mixed versions of model [I] and included individual [II], age-related [III], or both individual and age-related [IV] random terms to explain these sources of variation in maintenance requirement (a). Differences were reported as significant at P ≤ 0.05. The mean square error was 2,111, 1,532, 1,668, and 46 for models [I–IV] respectively, inferring extra random variation was explained by incorporating 1 or 2 random terms. Estimated ME partitioned to maintenance [IV] was 130.6 ± 1.15 kcal/kg(0.58), and the ME requirement for ADG and EM were 0.63 ± 0.03 kcal/g/kg(0.54) and 2.42 ± 0.04 kcal/g, respectively. During the laying period, maintenance estimates were 124.2 and 137.4 kcal/kg(0.58) for standard and high BW treatment, and 130.7, 132.2, and 129.5 kcal/kg(0.58) for the 8L:16D, 10L:14D, or 12L:12D treatments, respectively. Although hens on the standard BW treatment with a 12L:12D rearing photoschedule were most energetically conservative, their reproductive performance was the poorest. Model IV provided a new biologically sound method for estimation of life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders including an age-related random term. Elsevier 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7598000/ /pubmed/32867986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.016 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Metabolism and Nutrition
van der Klein, S.A.S.
Bédécarrats, G.Y.
Zuidhof, M.J.
Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods
title Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods
title_full Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods
title_fullStr Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods
title_full_unstemmed Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods
title_short Modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods
title_sort modeling life-time energy partitioning in broiler breeders with differing body weight and rearing photoperiods
topic Metabolism and Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.016
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderkleinsas modelinglifetimeenergypartitioninginbroilerbreederswithdifferingbodyweightandrearingphotoperiods
AT bedecarratsgy modelinglifetimeenergypartitioninginbroilerbreederswithdifferingbodyweightandrearingphotoperiods
AT zuidhofmj modelinglifetimeenergypartitioninginbroilerbreederswithdifferingbodyweightandrearingphotoperiods