Cargando…

Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers

The hypothesis was tested that an increased digestion of coarse compared with fine limestone can alleviate the negative effects of a low dietary Ca/P ratio on the growth performance and characteristics of tibia strength (CTS) in broilers. A total of 1,152 Ross 308 broiler chickens received a standar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Y.X., Bikker, P., Duijster, M., Hendriks, W.H., van Baal, J., van Krimpen, M.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.037
_version_ 1783602518958276608
author Hu, Y.X.
Bikker, P.
Duijster, M.
Hendriks, W.H.
van Baal, J.
van Krimpen, M.M.
author_facet Hu, Y.X.
Bikker, P.
Duijster, M.
Hendriks, W.H.
van Baal, J.
van Krimpen, M.M.
author_sort Hu, Y.X.
collection PubMed
description The hypothesis was tested that an increased digestion of coarse compared with fine limestone can alleviate the negative effects of a low dietary Ca/P ratio on the growth performance and characteristics of tibia strength (CTS) in broilers. A total of 1,152 Ross 308 broiler chickens received a standard commercial starter feed from day 0 to 13. From day 14 onward, birds received 1 of 12 diets containing 1 of 6 Ca/P ratios (0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, and 1.75) and 1 of 2 limestone particle sizes (<500 [fine] and 500 to 2,000 [coarse] μm) in a study with a 6 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Total P content was fixed at 5.5 g/kg for all treatment diets. Each treatment was replicated 6 times with 16 birds per replicate pen. On day 20 and 21, twelve birds per pen were randomly selected from 4 of the 6 replicate pens for tibia analysis and digesta collection from different gut segments. The apparent Ca digestibility was higher for fine than coarse limestone in the jejunum (P = 0.043). However, this difference in Ca digestibility disappeared for the low, whereas it remained for the high Ca/P ratios in the proximal (P(interaction) = 0.067) and distal (P(interaction) = 0.052) ileum. In addition, coarse limestone improved apparent P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001) but not in the jejunum (P = 0.305). Regardless of limestone particle size, reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly improved apparent Ca and P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001). Moreover, decreasing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.001) and quadratically (P < 0.046) reduced the CTS. Reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.003) and quadratically (P ≤ 0.006) decreased body weight gain and increased feed conversion ratio. For both fine and coarse limestone, the optimal Ca/P ratio was 1.00 to 1.25 to optimize apparent Ca and P digestibility while maintaining growth performance and CTS. Reducing Ca/P ratio from 1.75 to 1.00 improved distal ileal Ca and P apparent digestibility from 36.6 to 53.7% and 48.0 to 58.3%, respectively. In conclusion, coarse limestone is equally digestible with fine limestone at a low Ca/P ratio but is less digestible at a high Ca/P ratio, and the optimal Ca/P ratio in the diet is 1.00 to 1.25 for both fine and coarse limestone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7598140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75981402020-11-03 Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers Hu, Y.X. Bikker, P. Duijster, M. Hendriks, W.H. van Baal, J. van Krimpen, M.M. Poult Sci Metabolism and Nutrition The hypothesis was tested that an increased digestion of coarse compared with fine limestone can alleviate the negative effects of a low dietary Ca/P ratio on the growth performance and characteristics of tibia strength (CTS) in broilers. A total of 1,152 Ross 308 broiler chickens received a standard commercial starter feed from day 0 to 13. From day 14 onward, birds received 1 of 12 diets containing 1 of 6 Ca/P ratios (0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, and 1.75) and 1 of 2 limestone particle sizes (<500 [fine] and 500 to 2,000 [coarse] μm) in a study with a 6 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Total P content was fixed at 5.5 g/kg for all treatment diets. Each treatment was replicated 6 times with 16 birds per replicate pen. On day 20 and 21, twelve birds per pen were randomly selected from 4 of the 6 replicate pens for tibia analysis and digesta collection from different gut segments. The apparent Ca digestibility was higher for fine than coarse limestone in the jejunum (P = 0.043). However, this difference in Ca digestibility disappeared for the low, whereas it remained for the high Ca/P ratios in the proximal (P(interaction) = 0.067) and distal (P(interaction) = 0.052) ileum. In addition, coarse limestone improved apparent P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001) but not in the jejunum (P = 0.305). Regardless of limestone particle size, reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly improved apparent Ca and P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001). Moreover, decreasing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.001) and quadratically (P < 0.046) reduced the CTS. Reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.003) and quadratically (P ≤ 0.006) decreased body weight gain and increased feed conversion ratio. For both fine and coarse limestone, the optimal Ca/P ratio was 1.00 to 1.25 to optimize apparent Ca and P digestibility while maintaining growth performance and CTS. Reducing Ca/P ratio from 1.75 to 1.00 improved distal ileal Ca and P apparent digestibility from 36.6 to 53.7% and 48.0 to 58.3%, respectively. In conclusion, coarse limestone is equally digestible with fine limestone at a low Ca/P ratio but is less digestible at a high Ca/P ratio, and the optimal Ca/P ratio in the diet is 1.00 to 1.25 for both fine and coarse limestone. Elsevier 2020-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7598140/ /pubmed/32988534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.037 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Metabolism and Nutrition
Hu, Y.X.
Bikker, P.
Duijster, M.
Hendriks, W.H.
van Baal, J.
van Krimpen, M.M.
Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
title Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
title_full Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
title_fullStr Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
title_full_unstemmed Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
title_short Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
title_sort coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low ca/p ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
topic Metabolism and Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.037
work_keys_str_mv AT huyx coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers
AT bikkerp coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers
AT duijsterm coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers
AT hendrikswh coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers
AT vanbaalj coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers
AT vankrimpenmm coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers