Cargando…
Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers
The hypothesis was tested that an increased digestion of coarse compared with fine limestone can alleviate the negative effects of a low dietary Ca/P ratio on the growth performance and characteristics of tibia strength (CTS) in broilers. A total of 1,152 Ross 308 broiler chickens received a standar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.037 |
_version_ | 1783602518958276608 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Y.X. Bikker, P. Duijster, M. Hendriks, W.H. van Baal, J. van Krimpen, M.M. |
author_facet | Hu, Y.X. Bikker, P. Duijster, M. Hendriks, W.H. van Baal, J. van Krimpen, M.M. |
author_sort | Hu, Y.X. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hypothesis was tested that an increased digestion of coarse compared with fine limestone can alleviate the negative effects of a low dietary Ca/P ratio on the growth performance and characteristics of tibia strength (CTS) in broilers. A total of 1,152 Ross 308 broiler chickens received a standard commercial starter feed from day 0 to 13. From day 14 onward, birds received 1 of 12 diets containing 1 of 6 Ca/P ratios (0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, and 1.75) and 1 of 2 limestone particle sizes (<500 [fine] and 500 to 2,000 [coarse] μm) in a study with a 6 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Total P content was fixed at 5.5 g/kg for all treatment diets. Each treatment was replicated 6 times with 16 birds per replicate pen. On day 20 and 21, twelve birds per pen were randomly selected from 4 of the 6 replicate pens for tibia analysis and digesta collection from different gut segments. The apparent Ca digestibility was higher for fine than coarse limestone in the jejunum (P = 0.043). However, this difference in Ca digestibility disappeared for the low, whereas it remained for the high Ca/P ratios in the proximal (P(interaction) = 0.067) and distal (P(interaction) = 0.052) ileum. In addition, coarse limestone improved apparent P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001) but not in the jejunum (P = 0.305). Regardless of limestone particle size, reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly improved apparent Ca and P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001). Moreover, decreasing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.001) and quadratically (P < 0.046) reduced the CTS. Reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.003) and quadratically (P ≤ 0.006) decreased body weight gain and increased feed conversion ratio. For both fine and coarse limestone, the optimal Ca/P ratio was 1.00 to 1.25 to optimize apparent Ca and P digestibility while maintaining growth performance and CTS. Reducing Ca/P ratio from 1.75 to 1.00 improved distal ileal Ca and P apparent digestibility from 36.6 to 53.7% and 48.0 to 58.3%, respectively. In conclusion, coarse limestone is equally digestible with fine limestone at a low Ca/P ratio but is less digestible at a high Ca/P ratio, and the optimal Ca/P ratio in the diet is 1.00 to 1.25 for both fine and coarse limestone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7598140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75981402020-11-03 Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers Hu, Y.X. Bikker, P. Duijster, M. Hendriks, W.H. van Baal, J. van Krimpen, M.M. Poult Sci Metabolism and Nutrition The hypothesis was tested that an increased digestion of coarse compared with fine limestone can alleviate the negative effects of a low dietary Ca/P ratio on the growth performance and characteristics of tibia strength (CTS) in broilers. A total of 1,152 Ross 308 broiler chickens received a standard commercial starter feed from day 0 to 13. From day 14 onward, birds received 1 of 12 diets containing 1 of 6 Ca/P ratios (0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, and 1.75) and 1 of 2 limestone particle sizes (<500 [fine] and 500 to 2,000 [coarse] μm) in a study with a 6 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Total P content was fixed at 5.5 g/kg for all treatment diets. Each treatment was replicated 6 times with 16 birds per replicate pen. On day 20 and 21, twelve birds per pen were randomly selected from 4 of the 6 replicate pens for tibia analysis and digesta collection from different gut segments. The apparent Ca digestibility was higher for fine than coarse limestone in the jejunum (P = 0.043). However, this difference in Ca digestibility disappeared for the low, whereas it remained for the high Ca/P ratios in the proximal (P(interaction) = 0.067) and distal (P(interaction) = 0.052) ileum. In addition, coarse limestone improved apparent P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001) but not in the jejunum (P = 0.305). Regardless of limestone particle size, reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly improved apparent Ca and P digestibility in the proximal and distal ileum (P < 0.001). Moreover, decreasing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.001) and quadratically (P < 0.046) reduced the CTS. Reducing dietary Ca/P ratio linearly (P < 0.003) and quadratically (P ≤ 0.006) decreased body weight gain and increased feed conversion ratio. For both fine and coarse limestone, the optimal Ca/P ratio was 1.00 to 1.25 to optimize apparent Ca and P digestibility while maintaining growth performance and CTS. Reducing Ca/P ratio from 1.75 to 1.00 improved distal ileal Ca and P apparent digestibility from 36.6 to 53.7% and 48.0 to 58.3%, respectively. In conclusion, coarse limestone is equally digestible with fine limestone at a low Ca/P ratio but is less digestible at a high Ca/P ratio, and the optimal Ca/P ratio in the diet is 1.00 to 1.25 for both fine and coarse limestone. Elsevier 2020-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7598140/ /pubmed/32988534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.037 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Metabolism and Nutrition Hu, Y.X. Bikker, P. Duijster, M. Hendriks, W.H. van Baal, J. van Krimpen, M.M. Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers |
title | Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers |
title_full | Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers |
title_fullStr | Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers |
title_full_unstemmed | Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers |
title_short | Coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low Ca/P ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers |
title_sort | coarse limestone does not alleviate the negative effect of a low ca/p ratio diet on characteristics of tibia strength and growth performance in broilers |
topic | Metabolism and Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32988534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huyx coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers AT bikkerp coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers AT duijsterm coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers AT hendrikswh coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers AT vanbaalj coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers AT vankrimpenmm coarselimestonedoesnotalleviatethenegativeeffectofalowcapratiodietoncharacteristicsoftibiastrengthandgrowthperformanceinbroilers |