Cargando…
Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Recommendations for preventive statin treatment in patients with stable chest pain may be difficult as symptoms can be unspecific. It is unclear if coronary CT angiography (CTA)-detected coronary artery disease (CAD) can optimize statin prescription. Methods: In stable chest pain patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32987771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103076 |
_version_ | 1783602668326879232 |
---|---|
author | Pursnani, Amit Taron, Jana Mayrhofer, Thomas Lu, Michael T. Ferencik, Maros Ladapo, Joseph A. Douglas, Pamela S. Hoffmann, Udo |
author_facet | Pursnani, Amit Taron, Jana Mayrhofer, Thomas Lu, Michael T. Ferencik, Maros Ladapo, Joseph A. Douglas, Pamela S. Hoffmann, Udo |
author_sort | Pursnani, Amit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Recommendations for preventive statin treatment in patients with stable chest pain may be difficult as symptoms can be unspecific. It is unclear if coronary CT angiography (CTA)-detected coronary artery disease (CAD) can optimize statin prescription. Methods: In stable chest pain patients randomized to CTA in the PROMISE trial, statin eligibility was defined per 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. Primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina over 26 months median follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) of non-obstructive (1–69% stenosis) and obstructive (≥70% stenosis) CAD for events were determined using Cox proportional hazard models. Calculated HR were then incorporated into the ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation (PCE) to revised ASCVD risk and assess re-classification of statin eligibility. Results: Among 3986 patients (60.5 ± 8.2 years; 51% female), 72.9% (2904/3986) were statin eligible. Event rates in statin-eligible vs. ineligible patients were 3.3% vs. 2.3% (HR = 1.4 (95% CI 0.9–2.2), p = 0.142). Although the proportion of statin-eligible patients increased with CAD severity, 54% without CAD were statin eligible. Incorporating information on CAD into PCE reclassified 12.7% of patients (1.3% towards statin, 11.4% towards no statin). Similar results were found in stratified analysis of statin naïve patients (reclassification of 13.9%, 1.0% towards statin, and 12.9% towards no statin). As a result, revised ASCVD risk improved model discrimination in all patients (c-statistic: 0.59 (95 %CI 0.55–0.62) vs. 0.52 (95 %CI 0.49–0.56); p 0.001), while reducing statin use by 10.1% (62.7% vs. 72.9% statin eligible, p 0.001). Conclusion: In stable chest pain patients, integration of CAD into guideline recommendations was associated with greater accuracy to reclassify those at increased risk for incident events and a more efficient use of statins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7598635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75986352020-10-31 Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial Pursnani, Amit Taron, Jana Mayrhofer, Thomas Lu, Michael T. Ferencik, Maros Ladapo, Joseph A. Douglas, Pamela S. Hoffmann, Udo J Clin Med Article Background: Recommendations for preventive statin treatment in patients with stable chest pain may be difficult as symptoms can be unspecific. It is unclear if coronary CT angiography (CTA)-detected coronary artery disease (CAD) can optimize statin prescription. Methods: In stable chest pain patients randomized to CTA in the PROMISE trial, statin eligibility was defined per 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. Primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina over 26 months median follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) of non-obstructive (1–69% stenosis) and obstructive (≥70% stenosis) CAD for events were determined using Cox proportional hazard models. Calculated HR were then incorporated into the ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation (PCE) to revised ASCVD risk and assess re-classification of statin eligibility. Results: Among 3986 patients (60.5 ± 8.2 years; 51% female), 72.9% (2904/3986) were statin eligible. Event rates in statin-eligible vs. ineligible patients were 3.3% vs. 2.3% (HR = 1.4 (95% CI 0.9–2.2), p = 0.142). Although the proportion of statin-eligible patients increased with CAD severity, 54% without CAD were statin eligible. Incorporating information on CAD into PCE reclassified 12.7% of patients (1.3% towards statin, 11.4% towards no statin). Similar results were found in stratified analysis of statin naïve patients (reclassification of 13.9%, 1.0% towards statin, and 12.9% towards no statin). As a result, revised ASCVD risk improved model discrimination in all patients (c-statistic: 0.59 (95 %CI 0.55–0.62) vs. 0.52 (95 %CI 0.49–0.56); p 0.001), while reducing statin use by 10.1% (62.7% vs. 72.9% statin eligible, p 0.001). Conclusion: In stable chest pain patients, integration of CAD into guideline recommendations was associated with greater accuracy to reclassify those at increased risk for incident events and a more efficient use of statins. MDPI 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7598635/ /pubmed/32987771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103076 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pursnani, Amit Taron, Jana Mayrhofer, Thomas Lu, Michael T. Ferencik, Maros Ladapo, Joseph A. Douglas, Pamela S. Hoffmann, Udo Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | guideline-based statin eligibility, coronary artery stenosis and cardiovascular events in patients with stable chest pain: a secondary analysis of the promise randomized clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32987771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pursnaniamit guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial AT taronjana guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial AT mayrhoferthomas guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial AT lumichaelt guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial AT ferencikmaros guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial AT ladapojosepha guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial AT douglaspamelas guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial AT hoffmannudo guidelinebasedstatineligibilitycoronaryarterystenosisandcardiovasculareventsinpatientswithstablechestpainasecondaryanalysisofthepromiserandomizedclinicaltrial |