Cargando…

Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has routinely performed in recent years for lumbar disc herniation because of the advances in technology of minimally invasive spine surgery. Two common operating routes for PELD have been introduced in the literature: transforaminal appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Wei, Zheng, Yong, Liang, Guiqing, Chen, Guangfu, Hu, Yabin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022701
_version_ 1783602718243291136
author Chen, Wei
Zheng, Yong
Liang, Guiqing
Chen, Guangfu
Hu, Yabin
author_facet Chen, Wei
Zheng, Yong
Liang, Guiqing
Chen, Guangfu
Hu, Yabin
author_sort Chen, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has routinely performed in recent years for lumbar disc herniation because of the advances in technology of minimally invasive spine surgery. Two common operating routes for PELD have been introduced in the literature: transforaminal approach (TA) and interlaminar approach (IA). The purpose of our current retrospective clinical trial was to study whether the effect of IA-PELD is better than TA-PELD in the incidence of complications and clinical prognosis scores in the patients with L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Our present research was approved by the institutional review board in the Second Hospital of Nanjing. All the patients offered the informed consent. All the procedures containing human participants were conducted on the basis of the Helsinki Declaration. A retrospective analysis was implemented on 126 patients with L5-S1 disc herniated radiculopathy from March 2016 to March 2018, who were treated with the PELD utilizing the IA technique or the TA technique. Relevant data, such as the patients demographics, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, complications were recorded. In our work, the outcomes of patients were determined at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after treatment. The measure of primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index score. The other outcomes measured were Numeric Rating Scale pain scale, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, and complications. The software of SPSS Version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) was applied for the analysis of all the statistical data. When P value <.05, it was considered to be significant in statistics. RESULTS: This protocol will provide a solid theoretical basis for exploring which PELD approach is better in treatment of lumbar disc herniation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5988).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7598806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75988062020-11-02 Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol Chen, Wei Zheng, Yong Liang, Guiqing Chen, Guangfu Hu, Yabin Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has routinely performed in recent years for lumbar disc herniation because of the advances in technology of minimally invasive spine surgery. Two common operating routes for PELD have been introduced in the literature: transforaminal approach (TA) and interlaminar approach (IA). The purpose of our current retrospective clinical trial was to study whether the effect of IA-PELD is better than TA-PELD in the incidence of complications and clinical prognosis scores in the patients with L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Our present research was approved by the institutional review board in the Second Hospital of Nanjing. All the patients offered the informed consent. All the procedures containing human participants were conducted on the basis of the Helsinki Declaration. A retrospective analysis was implemented on 126 patients with L5-S1 disc herniated radiculopathy from March 2016 to March 2018, who were treated with the PELD utilizing the IA technique or the TA technique. Relevant data, such as the patients demographics, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, complications were recorded. In our work, the outcomes of patients were determined at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after treatment. The measure of primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index score. The other outcomes measured were Numeric Rating Scale pain scale, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, and complications. The software of SPSS Version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) was applied for the analysis of all the statistical data. When P value <.05, it was considered to be significant in statistics. RESULTS: This protocol will provide a solid theoretical basis for exploring which PELD approach is better in treatment of lumbar disc herniation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5988). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7598806/ /pubmed/33126307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022701 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Chen, Wei
Zheng, Yong
Liang, Guiqing
Chen, Guangfu
Hu, Yabin
Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol
title Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol
title_full Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol
title_fullStr Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol
title_short Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol
title_sort clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: a clinical study protocol
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022701
work_keys_str_mv AT chenwei clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol
AT zhengyong clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol
AT liangguiqing clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol
AT chenguangfu clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol
AT huyabin clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol