Cargando…
Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has routinely performed in recent years for lumbar disc herniation because of the advances in technology of minimally invasive spine surgery. Two common operating routes for PELD have been introduced in the literature: transforaminal appro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022701 |
_version_ | 1783602718243291136 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Wei Zheng, Yong Liang, Guiqing Chen, Guangfu Hu, Yabin |
author_facet | Chen, Wei Zheng, Yong Liang, Guiqing Chen, Guangfu Hu, Yabin |
author_sort | Chen, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has routinely performed in recent years for lumbar disc herniation because of the advances in technology of minimally invasive spine surgery. Two common operating routes for PELD have been introduced in the literature: transforaminal approach (TA) and interlaminar approach (IA). The purpose of our current retrospective clinical trial was to study whether the effect of IA-PELD is better than TA-PELD in the incidence of complications and clinical prognosis scores in the patients with L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Our present research was approved by the institutional review board in the Second Hospital of Nanjing. All the patients offered the informed consent. All the procedures containing human participants were conducted on the basis of the Helsinki Declaration. A retrospective analysis was implemented on 126 patients with L5-S1 disc herniated radiculopathy from March 2016 to March 2018, who were treated with the PELD utilizing the IA technique or the TA technique. Relevant data, such as the patients demographics, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, complications were recorded. In our work, the outcomes of patients were determined at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after treatment. The measure of primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index score. The other outcomes measured were Numeric Rating Scale pain scale, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, and complications. The software of SPSS Version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) was applied for the analysis of all the statistical data. When P value <.05, it was considered to be significant in statistics. RESULTS: This protocol will provide a solid theoretical basis for exploring which PELD approach is better in treatment of lumbar disc herniation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5988). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7598806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75988062020-11-02 Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol Chen, Wei Zheng, Yong Liang, Guiqing Chen, Guangfu Hu, Yabin Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has routinely performed in recent years for lumbar disc herniation because of the advances in technology of minimally invasive spine surgery. Two common operating routes for PELD have been introduced in the literature: transforaminal approach (TA) and interlaminar approach (IA). The purpose of our current retrospective clinical trial was to study whether the effect of IA-PELD is better than TA-PELD in the incidence of complications and clinical prognosis scores in the patients with L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Our present research was approved by the institutional review board in the Second Hospital of Nanjing. All the patients offered the informed consent. All the procedures containing human participants were conducted on the basis of the Helsinki Declaration. A retrospective analysis was implemented on 126 patients with L5-S1 disc herniated radiculopathy from March 2016 to March 2018, who were treated with the PELD utilizing the IA technique or the TA technique. Relevant data, such as the patients demographics, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, complications were recorded. In our work, the outcomes of patients were determined at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after treatment. The measure of primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index score. The other outcomes measured were Numeric Rating Scale pain scale, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, and complications. The software of SPSS Version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) was applied for the analysis of all the statistical data. When P value <.05, it was considered to be significant in statistics. RESULTS: This protocol will provide a solid theoretical basis for exploring which PELD approach is better in treatment of lumbar disc herniation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5988). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7598806/ /pubmed/33126307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022701 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Chen, Wei Zheng, Yong Liang, Guiqing Chen, Guangfu Hu, Yabin Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol |
title | Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol |
title_full | Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol |
title_fullStr | Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol |
title_short | Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol |
title_sort | clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: a clinical study protocol |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7598806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenwei clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol AT zhengyong clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol AT liangguiqing clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol AT chenguangfu clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol AT huyabin clinicaleffectsoftransforaminalapproachvsinterlaminarapproachintreatinglumbardischerniationaclinicalstudyprotocol |