Cargando…

A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)

BACKGROUND: Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an evidence-based work rehabilitation program helping people with moderate to severe mental illness to obtain ordinary employment. Although IPS has proven superior to other work rehabilitation programs, in many studies, the majority of the partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fyhn, Tonje, Ludvigsen, Kari, Reme, Silje E., Schaafsma, Frederieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00083-9
_version_ 1783602793971449856
author Fyhn, Tonje
Ludvigsen, Kari
Reme, Silje E.
Schaafsma, Frederieke
author_facet Fyhn, Tonje
Ludvigsen, Kari
Reme, Silje E.
Schaafsma, Frederieke
author_sort Fyhn, Tonje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an evidence-based work rehabilitation program helping people with moderate to severe mental illness to obtain ordinary employment. Although IPS has proven superior to other work rehabilitation programs, in many studies, the majority of the participants remain unemployed. Structured process evaluations of IPS that use mixed methods are scarce, although they could identify implementation aspects that may enhance its effect. The aim of the current study is to assess reach, fidelity, and identify barriers and facilitators to implement IPS. METHODS: The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial including six IPS centers, comparing IPS with treatment as usual in a population of patients in treatment for moderate to severe mental illness. Mixed methods were used in the process evaluation, including focus group interviews with service providers, individual interviews and survey data from participants, and fidelity reviews using the validated IPS Fidelity Scale. RESULTS: The intervention reached the intended target group. All centers reached fair to good fidelity according to the IPS Fidelity Scale within the project period (range 97–109, SD 8.1) (see Table 5). Certain fidelity items indicated implementation issues related to employer contact, community-based services, and integration with health services. Survey data showed that less than half of the participants regarded their illness as a barrier for participating in IPS and that freedom of disclosure was important. Participant interviews gave further insight into the role of the IPS specialist, emphasizing their availability and consistent job focus. CONCLUSIONS: Indications of implementation challenges across centers during the first year suggest special attention should be given to these aspects in an early phase to ensure higher fidelity from the start and thus enhance the effectiveness of IPS. The IPS specialist played an important role for participants and was described as positive, pushing in a positive way, and encouraging. More knowledge on the characteristics of successful IPS specialists could further enhance the effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov prior to the inclusion period (reg.no: NCT01964092, registered 17/07/2013). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s43058-020-00083-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7599092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75990922020-11-02 A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Fyhn, Tonje Ludvigsen, Kari Reme, Silje E. Schaafsma, Frederieke Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an evidence-based work rehabilitation program helping people with moderate to severe mental illness to obtain ordinary employment. Although IPS has proven superior to other work rehabilitation programs, in many studies, the majority of the participants remain unemployed. Structured process evaluations of IPS that use mixed methods are scarce, although they could identify implementation aspects that may enhance its effect. The aim of the current study is to assess reach, fidelity, and identify barriers and facilitators to implement IPS. METHODS: The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial including six IPS centers, comparing IPS with treatment as usual in a population of patients in treatment for moderate to severe mental illness. Mixed methods were used in the process evaluation, including focus group interviews with service providers, individual interviews and survey data from participants, and fidelity reviews using the validated IPS Fidelity Scale. RESULTS: The intervention reached the intended target group. All centers reached fair to good fidelity according to the IPS Fidelity Scale within the project period (range 97–109, SD 8.1) (see Table 5). Certain fidelity items indicated implementation issues related to employer contact, community-based services, and integration with health services. Survey data showed that less than half of the participants regarded their illness as a barrier for participating in IPS and that freedom of disclosure was important. Participant interviews gave further insight into the role of the IPS specialist, emphasizing their availability and consistent job focus. CONCLUSIONS: Indications of implementation challenges across centers during the first year suggest special attention should be given to these aspects in an early phase to ensure higher fidelity from the start and thus enhance the effectiveness of IPS. The IPS specialist played an important role for participants and was described as positive, pushing in a positive way, and encouraging. More knowledge on the characteristics of successful IPS specialists could further enhance the effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov prior to the inclusion period (reg.no: NCT01964092, registered 17/07/2013). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s43058-020-00083-9. BioMed Central 2020-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7599092/ /pubmed/33145494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00083-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fyhn, Tonje
Ludvigsen, Kari
Reme, Silje E.
Schaafsma, Frederieke
A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
title A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
title_full A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
title_fullStr A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
title_full_unstemmed A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
title_short A structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
title_sort structured mixed method process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of individual placement and support (ips)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00083-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fyhntonje astructuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips
AT ludvigsenkari astructuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips
AT remesiljee astructuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips
AT schaafsmafrederieke astructuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips
AT fyhntonje structuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips
AT ludvigsenkari structuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips
AT remesiljee structuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips
AT schaafsmafrederieke structuredmixedmethodprocessevaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialofindividualplacementandsupportips