Cargando…

Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?

Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papanikolaou, Ioannis S., Tziatzios, Georgios, Karatzas, Pantelis S., Gkolfakis, Paraskevas, Facciorusso, Antonio, Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162731
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0537
_version_ 1783602853250596864
author Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
Tziatzios, Georgios
Karatzas, Pantelis S.
Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
Facciorusso, Antonio
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
author_facet Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
Tziatzios, Georgios
Karatzas, Pantelis S.
Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
Facciorusso, Antonio
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
author_sort Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
collection PubMed
description Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualitative parameter; thus, implementation of specific indicators of quality is warranted. Irrespective of the nature of the endoscopic procedure, quality indicators usually refer to either structural properties of an endoscopy unit (e.g., examination availability), procedural factors (e.g., diagnostic accuracy), or patient outcomes (e.g., occurrence of an adverse event related to performance of an endoscopic procedure). Moreover, they are usually classified into 3 distinct sections, according to the phase of the procedure they relate to: i.e., before, during, and after the examination. The aim of this review is to present measures that need to be adopted in order to reach an optimal quality level during an endoscopic ultrasound examination and to provide up-to-date data regarding the respective quality indicators implicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7599358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75993582020-11-05 Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. Tziatzios, Georgios Karatzas, Pantelis S. Gkolfakis, Paraskevas Facciorusso, Antonio Triantafyllou, Konstantinos Ann Gastroenterol Invited Review Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualitative parameter; thus, implementation of specific indicators of quality is warranted. Irrespective of the nature of the endoscopic procedure, quality indicators usually refer to either structural properties of an endoscopy unit (e.g., examination availability), procedural factors (e.g., diagnostic accuracy), or patient outcomes (e.g., occurrence of an adverse event related to performance of an endoscopic procedure). Moreover, they are usually classified into 3 distinct sections, according to the phase of the procedure they relate to: i.e., before, during, and after the examination. The aim of this review is to present measures that need to be adopted in order to reach an optimal quality level during an endoscopic ultrasound examination and to provide up-to-date data regarding the respective quality indicators implicated. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2020 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7599358/ /pubmed/33162731 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0537 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
Tziatzios, Georgios
Karatzas, Pantelis S.
Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
Facciorusso, Antonio
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
title Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
title_full Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
title_fullStr Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
title_full_unstemmed Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
title_short Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
title_sort quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162731
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0537
work_keys_str_mv AT papanikolaouioanniss qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020
AT tziatziosgeorgios qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020
AT karatzaspanteliss qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020
AT gkolfakisparaskevas qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020
AT facciorussoantonio qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020
AT triantafylloukonstantinos qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020