Cargando…
Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020?
Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162731 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0537 |
_version_ | 1783602853250596864 |
---|---|
author | Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. Tziatzios, Georgios Karatzas, Pantelis S. Gkolfakis, Paraskevas Facciorusso, Antonio Triantafyllou, Konstantinos |
author_facet | Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. Tziatzios, Georgios Karatzas, Pantelis S. Gkolfakis, Paraskevas Facciorusso, Antonio Triantafyllou, Konstantinos |
author_sort | Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualitative parameter; thus, implementation of specific indicators of quality is warranted. Irrespective of the nature of the endoscopic procedure, quality indicators usually refer to either structural properties of an endoscopy unit (e.g., examination availability), procedural factors (e.g., diagnostic accuracy), or patient outcomes (e.g., occurrence of an adverse event related to performance of an endoscopic procedure). Moreover, they are usually classified into 3 distinct sections, according to the phase of the procedure they relate to: i.e., before, during, and after the examination. The aim of this review is to present measures that need to be adopted in order to reach an optimal quality level during an endoscopic ultrasound examination and to provide up-to-date data regarding the respective quality indicators implicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7599358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75993582020-11-05 Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. Tziatzios, Georgios Karatzas, Pantelis S. Gkolfakis, Paraskevas Facciorusso, Antonio Triantafyllou, Konstantinos Ann Gastroenterol Invited Review Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualitative parameter; thus, implementation of specific indicators of quality is warranted. Irrespective of the nature of the endoscopic procedure, quality indicators usually refer to either structural properties of an endoscopy unit (e.g., examination availability), procedural factors (e.g., diagnostic accuracy), or patient outcomes (e.g., occurrence of an adverse event related to performance of an endoscopic procedure). Moreover, they are usually classified into 3 distinct sections, according to the phase of the procedure they relate to: i.e., before, during, and after the examination. The aim of this review is to present measures that need to be adopted in order to reach an optimal quality level during an endoscopic ultrasound examination and to provide up-to-date data regarding the respective quality indicators implicated. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2020 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7599358/ /pubmed/33162731 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0537 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. Tziatzios, Georgios Karatzas, Pantelis S. Gkolfakis, Paraskevas Facciorusso, Antonio Triantafyllou, Konstantinos Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? |
title | Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? |
title_full | Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? |
title_fullStr | Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? |
title_short | Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? |
title_sort | quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what’s new in 2020? |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162731 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papanikolaouioanniss qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020 AT tziatziosgeorgios qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020 AT karatzaspanteliss qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020 AT gkolfakisparaskevas qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020 AT facciorussoantonio qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020 AT triantafylloukonstantinos qualityinpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundwhatsnewin2020 |