Cargando…

Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Objectives: In our study, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value and performance of the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Methods: Patients undergoing liver surgery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hau, Hans-Michael, Meyer, Felix, Jahn, Nora, Rademacher, Sebastian, Sucher, Robert, Seehofer, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33003424
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103152
_version_ 1783602914165522432
author Hau, Hans-Michael
Meyer, Felix
Jahn, Nora
Rademacher, Sebastian
Sucher, Robert
Seehofer, Daniel
author_facet Hau, Hans-Michael
Meyer, Felix
Jahn, Nora
Rademacher, Sebastian
Sucher, Robert
Seehofer, Daniel
author_sort Hau, Hans-Michael
collection PubMed
description Objectives: In our study, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value and performance of the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Methods: Patients undergoing liver surgery with curative intention for PHC between 2002 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Histopathological parameters and stage of the PHC were assessed according to the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification. The prognostic accuracy between staging systems was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. Results: Data for a total of 95 patients undergoing liver resection for PHC were analyzed. The median overall survival time was 21 months (95% CI 8.1–33.9), and the three- and five-year survival rates were 46.1% and 36.2%, respectively. Staging according to the 8th edition vs. the 7th edition resulted in the reclassification of 25 patients (26.3%). The log-rank p-values for the 7th and 8th editions were highly statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the 6th edition (p = 0.035). The AJCC 8th edition staging system showed a trend to better discrimination, with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52–0.84) compared to 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51–0.73) for the 7th edition. Multivariate survival analysis revealed male gender, age >65 years, positive resection margins, presence of distant metastases, poorly tumor differentiation, and lymph node involvement, such as no caudate lobe resection, as independent predictors of poor survival (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the current study, the newly released 8th edition of AJCC staging system showed no significant benefit compared to the previous 7th edition in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Further research may help to improve the prognostic value of the AJCC staging system for PHC—for instance, by identifying new prognostic markers or staging criteria, which may improve that individual patient’s outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7599593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75995932020-11-01 Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Hau, Hans-Michael Meyer, Felix Jahn, Nora Rademacher, Sebastian Sucher, Robert Seehofer, Daniel J Clin Med Article Objectives: In our study, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value and performance of the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Methods: Patients undergoing liver surgery with curative intention for PHC between 2002 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Histopathological parameters and stage of the PHC were assessed according to the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification. The prognostic accuracy between staging systems was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. Results: Data for a total of 95 patients undergoing liver resection for PHC were analyzed. The median overall survival time was 21 months (95% CI 8.1–33.9), and the three- and five-year survival rates were 46.1% and 36.2%, respectively. Staging according to the 8th edition vs. the 7th edition resulted in the reclassification of 25 patients (26.3%). The log-rank p-values for the 7th and 8th editions were highly statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the 6th edition (p = 0.035). The AJCC 8th edition staging system showed a trend to better discrimination, with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52–0.84) compared to 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51–0.73) for the 7th edition. Multivariate survival analysis revealed male gender, age >65 years, positive resection margins, presence of distant metastases, poorly tumor differentiation, and lymph node involvement, such as no caudate lobe resection, as independent predictors of poor survival (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the current study, the newly released 8th edition of AJCC staging system showed no significant benefit compared to the previous 7th edition in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Further research may help to improve the prognostic value of the AJCC staging system for PHC—for instance, by identifying new prognostic markers or staging criteria, which may improve that individual patient’s outcome. MDPI 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7599593/ /pubmed/33003424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103152 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hau, Hans-Michael
Meyer, Felix
Jahn, Nora
Rademacher, Sebastian
Sucher, Robert
Seehofer, Daniel
Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
title Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort prognostic relevance of the eighth edition of tnm classification for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33003424
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103152
work_keys_str_mv AT hauhansmichael prognosticrelevanceoftheeightheditionoftnmclassificationforresectedperihilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT meyerfelix prognosticrelevanceoftheeightheditionoftnmclassificationforresectedperihilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT jahnnora prognosticrelevanceoftheeightheditionoftnmclassificationforresectedperihilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT rademachersebastian prognosticrelevanceoftheeightheditionoftnmclassificationforresectedperihilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT sucherrobert prognosticrelevanceoftheeightheditionoftnmclassificationforresectedperihilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT seehoferdaniel prognosticrelevanceoftheeightheditionoftnmclassificationforresectedperihilarcholangiocarcinoma