Cargando…
Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age
Evidence for diet quality representing a modifiable risk factor for age-related cognitive decline and mood disturbances has typically come from retrospective, cross-sectional analyses. Here a diet screening tool (DST) was used to categorize healthy middle-aged volunteers (n = 141, 40–65 years) into...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12102964 |
_version_ | 1783602929087807488 |
---|---|
author | Young, Lauren M. Gauci, Sarah Scholey, Andrew White, David J. Lassemillante, Annie-Claude Meyer, Denny Pipingas, Andrew |
author_facet | Young, Lauren M. Gauci, Sarah Scholey, Andrew White, David J. Lassemillante, Annie-Claude Meyer, Denny Pipingas, Andrew |
author_sort | Young, Lauren M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence for diet quality representing a modifiable risk factor for age-related cognitive decline and mood disturbances has typically come from retrospective, cross-sectional analyses. Here a diet screening tool (DST) was used to categorize healthy middle-aged volunteers (n = 141, 40–65 years) into “optimal” or “sub-optimal” diet groups to investigate cross-sectional associations between diet quality, cognitive function, and mood. The DST distinguished levels of nutrient intake as assessed by Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall and nutrient status, as assessed by blood biomarker measures. Compared with the “sub-optimal” group, the “optimal” diet group showed significantly higher intake of vitamin E (p = 0.007), magnesium (p = 0.001), zinc (p = 0.043) and fiber (p = 0.015), higher circulating levels of vitamin B6 (p = 0.030) and red blood cell folate (p = 0.026) and lower saturated fatty acids (p = 0.012). Regarding psychological outcomes, the “optimal” diet group had significantly better Stroop processing than those with a “sub-optimal” diet (p = 0.013). Regression analysis revealed that higher DST scores were associated with fewer mood disturbances (p = 0.002) and lower perceived stress (p = 0.031), although these differences were not significant when comparing “optimal” versus “sub-optimal” as discrete groups. This study demonstrates the potential of a 20-item diet screen to identify both nutritional and psychological status in an Australian setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7599651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75996512020-11-01 Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age Young, Lauren M. Gauci, Sarah Scholey, Andrew White, David J. Lassemillante, Annie-Claude Meyer, Denny Pipingas, Andrew Nutrients Article Evidence for diet quality representing a modifiable risk factor for age-related cognitive decline and mood disturbances has typically come from retrospective, cross-sectional analyses. Here a diet screening tool (DST) was used to categorize healthy middle-aged volunteers (n = 141, 40–65 years) into “optimal” or “sub-optimal” diet groups to investigate cross-sectional associations between diet quality, cognitive function, and mood. The DST distinguished levels of nutrient intake as assessed by Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall and nutrient status, as assessed by blood biomarker measures. Compared with the “sub-optimal” group, the “optimal” diet group showed significantly higher intake of vitamin E (p = 0.007), magnesium (p = 0.001), zinc (p = 0.043) and fiber (p = 0.015), higher circulating levels of vitamin B6 (p = 0.030) and red blood cell folate (p = 0.026) and lower saturated fatty acids (p = 0.012). Regarding psychological outcomes, the “optimal” diet group had significantly better Stroop processing than those with a “sub-optimal” diet (p = 0.013). Regression analysis revealed that higher DST scores were associated with fewer mood disturbances (p = 0.002) and lower perceived stress (p = 0.031), although these differences were not significant when comparing “optimal” versus “sub-optimal” as discrete groups. This study demonstrates the potential of a 20-item diet screen to identify both nutritional and psychological status in an Australian setting. MDPI 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7599651/ /pubmed/32998296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12102964 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Young, Lauren M. Gauci, Sarah Scholey, Andrew White, David J. Lassemillante, Annie-Claude Meyer, Denny Pipingas, Andrew Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age |
title | Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age |
title_full | Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age |
title_fullStr | Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age |
title_short | Self-Reported Diet Quality Differentiates Nutrient Intake, Blood Nutrient Status, Mood, and Cognition: Implications for Identifying Nutritional Neurocognitive Risk Factors in Middle Age |
title_sort | self-reported diet quality differentiates nutrient intake, blood nutrient status, mood, and cognition: implications for identifying nutritional neurocognitive risk factors in middle age |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12102964 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT younglaurenm selfreporteddietqualitydifferentiatesnutrientintakebloodnutrientstatusmoodandcognitionimplicationsforidentifyingnutritionalneurocognitiveriskfactorsinmiddleage AT gaucisarah selfreporteddietqualitydifferentiatesnutrientintakebloodnutrientstatusmoodandcognitionimplicationsforidentifyingnutritionalneurocognitiveriskfactorsinmiddleage AT scholeyandrew selfreporteddietqualitydifferentiatesnutrientintakebloodnutrientstatusmoodandcognitionimplicationsforidentifyingnutritionalneurocognitiveriskfactorsinmiddleage AT whitedavidj selfreporteddietqualitydifferentiatesnutrientintakebloodnutrientstatusmoodandcognitionimplicationsforidentifyingnutritionalneurocognitiveriskfactorsinmiddleage AT lassemillanteannieclaude selfreporteddietqualitydifferentiatesnutrientintakebloodnutrientstatusmoodandcognitionimplicationsforidentifyingnutritionalneurocognitiveriskfactorsinmiddleage AT meyerdenny selfreporteddietqualitydifferentiatesnutrientintakebloodnutrientstatusmoodandcognitionimplicationsforidentifyingnutritionalneurocognitiveriskfactorsinmiddleage AT pipingasandrew selfreporteddietqualitydifferentiatesnutrientintakebloodnutrientstatusmoodandcognitionimplicationsforidentifyingnutritionalneurocognitiveriskfactorsinmiddleage |