Cargando…
A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?
Interdependence and attachment models have identified felt security as a critical foundation for commitment by orientating individuals towards relationship-promotion rather than self-protection. However, partners’ security also signals the relative safety to commit to relationships. The current inve...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207411 |
_version_ | 1783602944264896512 |
---|---|
author | Sasaki, Eri Overall, Nickola |
author_facet | Sasaki, Eri Overall, Nickola |
author_sort | Sasaki, Eri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interdependence and attachment models have identified felt security as a critical foundation for commitment by orientating individuals towards relationship-promotion rather than self-protection. However, partners’ security also signals the relative safety to commit to relationships. The current investigation adopted a dyadic perspective to examine whether partners’ security acts as a strong link by buffering the negative effects of actors’ insecurity on daily commitment. Across two daily diary studies (Study 1, N = 78 dyads and Study 2, N = 73 dyads), actors’ X partners’ daily felt security interactions revealed a strong-link pattern: lower actors’ felt security on a given day predicted lower daily commitment, but these reductions were mitigated when partners reported higher levels of felt security that day. Actors’ X partners’ trait insecurity (attachment anxiety) interaction also showed this strong-link pattern in Study 1 but not Study 2. The results suggest that partners’ felt security can help individuals experiencing insecurity overcome their self-protective impulses and feel safe enough to commit to their relationship on a daily basis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7599705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75997052020-11-01 A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? Sasaki, Eri Overall, Nickola Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Interdependence and attachment models have identified felt security as a critical foundation for commitment by orientating individuals towards relationship-promotion rather than self-protection. However, partners’ security also signals the relative safety to commit to relationships. The current investigation adopted a dyadic perspective to examine whether partners’ security acts as a strong link by buffering the negative effects of actors’ insecurity on daily commitment. Across two daily diary studies (Study 1, N = 78 dyads and Study 2, N = 73 dyads), actors’ X partners’ daily felt security interactions revealed a strong-link pattern: lower actors’ felt security on a given day predicted lower daily commitment, but these reductions were mitigated when partners reported higher levels of felt security that day. Actors’ X partners’ trait insecurity (attachment anxiety) interaction also showed this strong-link pattern in Study 1 but not Study 2. The results suggest that partners’ felt security can help individuals experiencing insecurity overcome their self-protective impulses and feel safe enough to commit to their relationship on a daily basis. MDPI 2020-10-12 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7599705/ /pubmed/33053727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207411 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sasaki, Eri Overall, Nickola A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? |
title | A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? |
title_full | A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? |
title_fullStr | A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? |
title_full_unstemmed | A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? |
title_short | A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? |
title_sort | dyadic perspective of felt security: does partners’ security buffer the effects of actors’ insecurity on daily commitment? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sasakieri adyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment AT overallnickola adyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment AT sasakieri dyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment AT overallnickola dyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment |