Cargando…

A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?

Interdependence and attachment models have identified felt security as a critical foundation for commitment by orientating individuals towards relationship-promotion rather than self-protection. However, partners’ security also signals the relative safety to commit to relationships. The current inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasaki, Eri, Overall, Nickola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207411
_version_ 1783602944264896512
author Sasaki, Eri
Overall, Nickola
author_facet Sasaki, Eri
Overall, Nickola
author_sort Sasaki, Eri
collection PubMed
description Interdependence and attachment models have identified felt security as a critical foundation for commitment by orientating individuals towards relationship-promotion rather than self-protection. However, partners’ security also signals the relative safety to commit to relationships. The current investigation adopted a dyadic perspective to examine whether partners’ security acts as a strong link by buffering the negative effects of actors’ insecurity on daily commitment. Across two daily diary studies (Study 1, N = 78 dyads and Study 2, N = 73 dyads), actors’ X partners’ daily felt security interactions revealed a strong-link pattern: lower actors’ felt security on a given day predicted lower daily commitment, but these reductions were mitigated when partners reported higher levels of felt security that day. Actors’ X partners’ trait insecurity (attachment anxiety) interaction also showed this strong-link pattern in Study 1 but not Study 2. The results suggest that partners’ felt security can help individuals experiencing insecurity overcome their self-protective impulses and feel safe enough to commit to their relationship on a daily basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7599705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75997052020-11-01 A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment? Sasaki, Eri Overall, Nickola Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Interdependence and attachment models have identified felt security as a critical foundation for commitment by orientating individuals towards relationship-promotion rather than self-protection. However, partners’ security also signals the relative safety to commit to relationships. The current investigation adopted a dyadic perspective to examine whether partners’ security acts as a strong link by buffering the negative effects of actors’ insecurity on daily commitment. Across two daily diary studies (Study 1, N = 78 dyads and Study 2, N = 73 dyads), actors’ X partners’ daily felt security interactions revealed a strong-link pattern: lower actors’ felt security on a given day predicted lower daily commitment, but these reductions were mitigated when partners reported higher levels of felt security that day. Actors’ X partners’ trait insecurity (attachment anxiety) interaction also showed this strong-link pattern in Study 1 but not Study 2. The results suggest that partners’ felt security can help individuals experiencing insecurity overcome their self-protective impulses and feel safe enough to commit to their relationship on a daily basis. MDPI 2020-10-12 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7599705/ /pubmed/33053727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207411 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sasaki, Eri
Overall, Nickola
A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?
title A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?
title_full A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?
title_fullStr A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?
title_full_unstemmed A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?
title_short A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security: Does Partners’ Security Buffer the Effects of Actors’ Insecurity on Daily Commitment?
title_sort dyadic perspective of felt security: does partners’ security buffer the effects of actors’ insecurity on daily commitment?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207411
work_keys_str_mv AT sasakieri adyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment
AT overallnickola adyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment
AT sasakieri dyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment
AT overallnickola dyadicperspectiveoffeltsecuritydoespartnerssecuritybuffertheeffectsofactorsinsecurityondailycommitment