Cargando…

Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms

Sow productivity, that is, the number of weaned piglets per sow per year, depends on their health status. The gut microbiota is considered a crucial factor in the health of pigs and may affect sow productivity. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between productivity and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uryu, Haruka, Tsukahara, Takamitsu, Ishikawa, Hiromichi, Oi, Munetaka, Otake, Satoshi, Yamane, Itsuro, Inoue, Ryo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32987859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101469
_version_ 1783602947730440192
author Uryu, Haruka
Tsukahara, Takamitsu
Ishikawa, Hiromichi
Oi, Munetaka
Otake, Satoshi
Yamane, Itsuro
Inoue, Ryo
author_facet Uryu, Haruka
Tsukahara, Takamitsu
Ishikawa, Hiromichi
Oi, Munetaka
Otake, Satoshi
Yamane, Itsuro
Inoue, Ryo
author_sort Uryu, Haruka
collection PubMed
description Sow productivity, that is, the number of weaned piglets per sow per year, depends on their health status. The gut microbiota is considered a crucial factor in the health of pigs and may affect sow productivity. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between productivity and the fecal microbiotas of sows in different farms. Feces of sows were collected from 18 farms (10 samples/farm). A total of 90 fecal samples of high-reproductive performance farms were labeled as group H, and 90 fecal samples from low-reproductive performance farms were labeled as group L. Fecal microbiotas were analyzed by 16S rRNA metagenomics, and the organic acids and putrefactive metabolites of the microbiotas were measured. β-diversity was significantly different between groups H and L (p < 0.01), and the relative abundances of 43 bacterial genera, including short-chain fatty acid-producing and fiber-degrading bacteria such as Ruminococcus, Fibrobacter and Butyricicoccus, significantly differed between groups (p < 0.05). In addition, the concentrations of acetate, propionate and n-butyrate were significantly higher in group H than in group L (p < 0.05). In conclusion, sow productivity in farms was likely associated with the compositions of the fecal microbiotas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7599717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75997172020-11-01 Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms Uryu, Haruka Tsukahara, Takamitsu Ishikawa, Hiromichi Oi, Munetaka Otake, Satoshi Yamane, Itsuro Inoue, Ryo Microorganisms Article Sow productivity, that is, the number of weaned piglets per sow per year, depends on their health status. The gut microbiota is considered a crucial factor in the health of pigs and may affect sow productivity. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between productivity and the fecal microbiotas of sows in different farms. Feces of sows were collected from 18 farms (10 samples/farm). A total of 90 fecal samples of high-reproductive performance farms were labeled as group H, and 90 fecal samples from low-reproductive performance farms were labeled as group L. Fecal microbiotas were analyzed by 16S rRNA metagenomics, and the organic acids and putrefactive metabolites of the microbiotas were measured. β-diversity was significantly different between groups H and L (p < 0.01), and the relative abundances of 43 bacterial genera, including short-chain fatty acid-producing and fiber-degrading bacteria such as Ruminococcus, Fibrobacter and Butyricicoccus, significantly differed between groups (p < 0.05). In addition, the concentrations of acetate, propionate and n-butyrate were significantly higher in group H than in group L (p < 0.05). In conclusion, sow productivity in farms was likely associated with the compositions of the fecal microbiotas. MDPI 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7599717/ /pubmed/32987859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101469 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Uryu, Haruka
Tsukahara, Takamitsu
Ishikawa, Hiromichi
Oi, Munetaka
Otake, Satoshi
Yamane, Itsuro
Inoue, Ryo
Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms
title Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms
title_full Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms
title_fullStr Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms
title_short Comparison of Productivity and Fecal Microbiotas of Sows in Commercial Farms
title_sort comparison of productivity and fecal microbiotas of sows in commercial farms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32987859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101469
work_keys_str_mv AT uryuharuka comparisonofproductivityandfecalmicrobiotasofsowsincommercialfarms
AT tsukaharatakamitsu comparisonofproductivityandfecalmicrobiotasofsowsincommercialfarms
AT ishikawahiromichi comparisonofproductivityandfecalmicrobiotasofsowsincommercialfarms
AT oimunetaka comparisonofproductivityandfecalmicrobiotasofsowsincommercialfarms
AT otakesatoshi comparisonofproductivityandfecalmicrobiotasofsowsincommercialfarms
AT yamaneitsuro comparisonofproductivityandfecalmicrobiotasofsowsincommercialfarms
AT inoueryo comparisonofproductivityandfecalmicrobiotasofsowsincommercialfarms