Cargando…

Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelofibrosis (MF) is an advanced form of a group of rare, related bone marrow cancers termed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Some patients develop myelofibrosis from the outset, while in others, it occurs as a complication of the more indolent MPNs, polycythemia vera (PV) or es...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bose, Prithviraj, Masarova, Lucia, Verstovsek, Srdan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102891
_version_ 1783603005203939328
author Bose, Prithviraj
Masarova, Lucia
Verstovsek, Srdan
author_facet Bose, Prithviraj
Masarova, Lucia
Verstovsek, Srdan
author_sort Bose, Prithviraj
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelofibrosis (MF) is an advanced form of a group of rare, related bone marrow cancers termed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Some patients develop myelofibrosis from the outset, while in others, it occurs as a complication of the more indolent MPNs, polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients with PV or ET who require drug treatment are typically treated with the chemotherapy drug hydroxyurea, while in MF, the targeted therapies termed Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors form the mainstay of treatment. However, these and other drugs (e.g., interferons) have important limitations. No drug has been shown to reliably prevent the progression of PV or ET to MF or transformation of MPNs to acute myeloid leukemia. In PV, it is not conclusively known if JAK inhibitors reduce the risk of blood clots, and in MF, these drugs do not improve low blood counts. New approaches to treating MF and related MPNs are, therefore, necessary. ABSTRACT: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition forms the cornerstone of the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is often used as a second-line agent in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who fail hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, ruxolitinib continues to be studied in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). The benefits of JAK inhibition in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with MF are undeniable, and ruxolitinib prolongs the survival of persons with higher risk MF. Despite this, however, “disease-modifying” effects of JAK inhibitors in MF, i.e., bone marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burden reduction, are limited. Similarly, in HU-resistant/intolerant PV, while ruxolitinib provides excellent control of the hematocrit, symptoms and splenomegaly, reduction in the rate of thromboembolic events has not been convincingly demonstrated. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors do not prevent disease evolution to MF or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Frontline cytoreductive therapy for PV generally comprises HU and interferons, which have their own limitations. Numerous novel agents, representing diverse mechanisms of action, are in development for the treatment of these three classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). JAK inhibitor-based combinations, all of which are currently under study for MF, have been covered elsewhere in this issue. In this article, we focus on agents that have been studied as monotherapy in patients with MF, generally after JAK inhibitor resistance/intolerance, as well as several novel compounds in development for PV/ET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7599937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75999372020-11-01 Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms Bose, Prithviraj Masarova, Lucia Verstovsek, Srdan Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelofibrosis (MF) is an advanced form of a group of rare, related bone marrow cancers termed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Some patients develop myelofibrosis from the outset, while in others, it occurs as a complication of the more indolent MPNs, polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients with PV or ET who require drug treatment are typically treated with the chemotherapy drug hydroxyurea, while in MF, the targeted therapies termed Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors form the mainstay of treatment. However, these and other drugs (e.g., interferons) have important limitations. No drug has been shown to reliably prevent the progression of PV or ET to MF or transformation of MPNs to acute myeloid leukemia. In PV, it is not conclusively known if JAK inhibitors reduce the risk of blood clots, and in MF, these drugs do not improve low blood counts. New approaches to treating MF and related MPNs are, therefore, necessary. ABSTRACT: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition forms the cornerstone of the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is often used as a second-line agent in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who fail hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, ruxolitinib continues to be studied in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). The benefits of JAK inhibition in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with MF are undeniable, and ruxolitinib prolongs the survival of persons with higher risk MF. Despite this, however, “disease-modifying” effects of JAK inhibitors in MF, i.e., bone marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burden reduction, are limited. Similarly, in HU-resistant/intolerant PV, while ruxolitinib provides excellent control of the hematocrit, symptoms and splenomegaly, reduction in the rate of thromboembolic events has not been convincingly demonstrated. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors do not prevent disease evolution to MF or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Frontline cytoreductive therapy for PV generally comprises HU and interferons, which have their own limitations. Numerous novel agents, representing diverse mechanisms of action, are in development for the treatment of these three classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). JAK inhibitor-based combinations, all of which are currently under study for MF, have been covered elsewhere in this issue. In this article, we focus on agents that have been studied as monotherapy in patients with MF, generally after JAK inhibitor resistance/intolerance, as well as several novel compounds in development for PV/ET. MDPI 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7599937/ /pubmed/33050168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102891 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bose, Prithviraj
Masarova, Lucia
Verstovsek, Srdan
Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_full Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_fullStr Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_short Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_sort novel concepts of treatment for patients with myelofibrosis and related neoplasms
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7599937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102891
work_keys_str_mv AT boseprithviraj novelconceptsoftreatmentforpatientswithmyelofibrosisandrelatedneoplasms
AT masarovalucia novelconceptsoftreatmentforpatientswithmyelofibrosisandrelatedneoplasms
AT verstovseksrdan novelconceptsoftreatmentforpatientswithmyelofibrosisandrelatedneoplasms