Cargando…
Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake?
Background: High physiological 16α-[(18)F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol ([(18)F]-FES) uptake in the abdomen is a limitation of this positron emission tomography (PET) tracer. Therefore, we investigated the effect of food intake prior to PET acquisition on abdominal background activity in [(18)F]-FES-PET sca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993099 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100756 |
_version_ | 1783603057977720832 |
---|---|
author | Boers, Jorianne Giatagana, Katerina Schröder, Carolina P. Hospers, Geke A.P. de Vries, Erik F.J. Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M. |
author_facet | Boers, Jorianne Giatagana, Katerina Schröder, Carolina P. Hospers, Geke A.P. de Vries, Erik F.J. Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M. |
author_sort | Boers, Jorianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: High physiological 16α-[(18)F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol ([(18)F]-FES) uptake in the abdomen is a limitation of this positron emission tomography (PET) tracer. Therefore, we investigated the effect of food intake prior to PET acquisition on abdominal background activity in [(18)F]-FES-PET scans. Methods: Breast cancer patients referred for [(18)F]-FES-PET were included. Three groups were designed: (1) patients who consumed a chocolate bar (fatty meal) between tracer injection and imaging (n = 20), (2) patients who fasted before imaging (n = 20), and (3) patients without diet restrictions (control group, n = 20). We compared the physiological [(18)F]-FES uptake, expressed as mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean)), in the abdomen between groups. Results: A significant difference in [(18)F]-FES uptake in the gall bladder and stomach lumen was observed between groups, with the lowest values for the chocolate group and highest for the fasting group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.011, respectively). Post hoc analysis showed significant differences in the SUVmean of these organs between the chocolate and fasting groups, but not between the chocolate and control groups. Conclusion: This exploratory study showed that, compared to fasting, eating chocolate decreases physiological gall bladder and stomach [(18)F]-FES uptake; further reduction through a normal diet was not seen. A prospective study is warranted to confirm this finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7600120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76001202020-11-01 Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake? Boers, Jorianne Giatagana, Katerina Schröder, Carolina P. Hospers, Geke A.P. de Vries, Erik F.J. Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: High physiological 16α-[(18)F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol ([(18)F]-FES) uptake in the abdomen is a limitation of this positron emission tomography (PET) tracer. Therefore, we investigated the effect of food intake prior to PET acquisition on abdominal background activity in [(18)F]-FES-PET scans. Methods: Breast cancer patients referred for [(18)F]-FES-PET were included. Three groups were designed: (1) patients who consumed a chocolate bar (fatty meal) between tracer injection and imaging (n = 20), (2) patients who fasted before imaging (n = 20), and (3) patients without diet restrictions (control group, n = 20). We compared the physiological [(18)F]-FES uptake, expressed as mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean)), in the abdomen between groups. Results: A significant difference in [(18)F]-FES uptake in the gall bladder and stomach lumen was observed between groups, with the lowest values for the chocolate group and highest for the fasting group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.011, respectively). Post hoc analysis showed significant differences in the SUVmean of these organs between the chocolate and fasting groups, but not between the chocolate and control groups. Conclusion: This exploratory study showed that, compared to fasting, eating chocolate decreases physiological gall bladder and stomach [(18)F]-FES uptake; further reduction through a normal diet was not seen. A prospective study is warranted to confirm this finding. MDPI 2020-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7600120/ /pubmed/32993099 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100756 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Boers, Jorianne Giatagana, Katerina Schröder, Carolina P. Hospers, Geke A.P. de Vries, Erik F.J. Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M. Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake? |
title | Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake? |
title_full | Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake? |
title_fullStr | Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake? |
title_full_unstemmed | Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake? |
title_short | Image Quality and Interpretation of [(18)F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake? |
title_sort | image quality and interpretation of [(18)f]-fes-pet: is there any effect of food intake? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993099 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boersjorianne imagequalityandinterpretationof18ffespetisthereanyeffectoffoodintake AT giataganakaterina imagequalityandinterpretationof18ffespetisthereanyeffectoffoodintake AT schrodercarolinap imagequalityandinterpretationof18ffespetisthereanyeffectoffoodintake AT hospersgekeap imagequalityandinterpretationof18ffespetisthereanyeffectoffoodintake AT devrieserikfj imagequalityandinterpretationof18ffespetisthereanyeffectoffoodintake AT glaudemansandorwjm imagequalityandinterpretationof18ffespetisthereanyeffectoffoodintake |