Cargando…
Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China
Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is a highly contagious and devastating disease. The traditional live attenuated C-strain vaccine is widely used to control disease outbreaks in China. Since 2000, subgenotype 2.1 has become dominant in China. Here, we isolated...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100821 |
_version_ | 1783603095594336256 |
---|---|
author | Hao, Genxi Zhang, Huawei Chen, Huanchun Qian, Ping Li, Xiangmin |
author_facet | Hao, Genxi Zhang, Huawei Chen, Huanchun Qian, Ping Li, Xiangmin |
author_sort | Hao, Genxi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is a highly contagious and devastating disease. The traditional live attenuated C-strain vaccine is widely used to control disease outbreaks in China. Since 2000, subgenotype 2.1 has become dominant in China. Here, we isolated subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains from CSF-suspected pigs. The genetic variations and pathogenesis of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains were investigated experimentally. We aimed to evaluate and compare the replication characteristics and clinical signs of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains with those of the typical highly virulent CSFV SM strain. In PK-15 cells, the three CSFV isolates exhibited similar replication levels but significantly lower replication levels compared with the CSFV SM strain. The experimental animal infection model showed that the pathogenicity of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains was less than that of the CSFV SM strain. According to the clinical scoring system, subgenotype 2.1c (GDGZ-2019) and 2.1d (HBXY-2019 and GXGG-2019) strains were moderately virulent. This study showed that the pathogenicity of CSFV field strains will aid in the understanding of CSFV biological characteristics and the related epidemiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7600237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76002372020-11-01 Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China Hao, Genxi Zhang, Huawei Chen, Huanchun Qian, Ping Li, Xiangmin Pathogens Article Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is a highly contagious and devastating disease. The traditional live attenuated C-strain vaccine is widely used to control disease outbreaks in China. Since 2000, subgenotype 2.1 has become dominant in China. Here, we isolated subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains from CSF-suspected pigs. The genetic variations and pathogenesis of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains were investigated experimentally. We aimed to evaluate and compare the replication characteristics and clinical signs of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains with those of the typical highly virulent CSFV SM strain. In PK-15 cells, the three CSFV isolates exhibited similar replication levels but significantly lower replication levels compared with the CSFV SM strain. The experimental animal infection model showed that the pathogenicity of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains was less than that of the CSFV SM strain. According to the clinical scoring system, subgenotype 2.1c (GDGZ-2019) and 2.1d (HBXY-2019 and GXGG-2019) strains were moderately virulent. This study showed that the pathogenicity of CSFV field strains will aid in the understanding of CSFV biological characteristics and the related epidemiology. MDPI 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7600237/ /pubmed/33036431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100821 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hao, Genxi Zhang, Huawei Chen, Huanchun Qian, Ping Li, Xiangmin Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China |
title | Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China |
title_full | Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China |
title_short | Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China |
title_sort | comparison of the pathogenicity of classical swine fever virus subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains from china |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haogenxi comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina AT zhanghuawei comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina AT chenhuanchun comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina AT qianping comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina AT lixiangmin comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina |