Cargando…

Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China

Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is a highly contagious and devastating disease. The traditional live attenuated C-strain vaccine is widely used to control disease outbreaks in China. Since 2000, subgenotype 2.1 has become dominant in China. Here, we isolated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Genxi, Zhang, Huawei, Chen, Huanchun, Qian, Ping, Li, Xiangmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100821
_version_ 1783603095594336256
author Hao, Genxi
Zhang, Huawei
Chen, Huanchun
Qian, Ping
Li, Xiangmin
author_facet Hao, Genxi
Zhang, Huawei
Chen, Huanchun
Qian, Ping
Li, Xiangmin
author_sort Hao, Genxi
collection PubMed
description Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is a highly contagious and devastating disease. The traditional live attenuated C-strain vaccine is widely used to control disease outbreaks in China. Since 2000, subgenotype 2.1 has become dominant in China. Here, we isolated subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains from CSF-suspected pigs. The genetic variations and pathogenesis of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains were investigated experimentally. We aimed to evaluate and compare the replication characteristics and clinical signs of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains with those of the typical highly virulent CSFV SM strain. In PK-15 cells, the three CSFV isolates exhibited similar replication levels but significantly lower replication levels compared with the CSFV SM strain. The experimental animal infection model showed that the pathogenicity of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains was less than that of the CSFV SM strain. According to the clinical scoring system, subgenotype 2.1c (GDGZ-2019) and 2.1d (HBXY-2019 and GXGG-2019) strains were moderately virulent. This study showed that the pathogenicity of CSFV field strains will aid in the understanding of CSFV biological characteristics and the related epidemiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7600237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76002372020-11-01 Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China Hao, Genxi Zhang, Huawei Chen, Huanchun Qian, Ping Li, Xiangmin Pathogens Article Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is a highly contagious and devastating disease. The traditional live attenuated C-strain vaccine is widely used to control disease outbreaks in China. Since 2000, subgenotype 2.1 has become dominant in China. Here, we isolated subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains from CSF-suspected pigs. The genetic variations and pathogenesis of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains were investigated experimentally. We aimed to evaluate and compare the replication characteristics and clinical signs of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains with those of the typical highly virulent CSFV SM strain. In PK-15 cells, the three CSFV isolates exhibited similar replication levels but significantly lower replication levels compared with the CSFV SM strain. The experimental animal infection model showed that the pathogenicity of subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains was less than that of the CSFV SM strain. According to the clinical scoring system, subgenotype 2.1c (GDGZ-2019) and 2.1d (HBXY-2019 and GXGG-2019) strains were moderately virulent. This study showed that the pathogenicity of CSFV field strains will aid in the understanding of CSFV biological characteristics and the related epidemiology. MDPI 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7600237/ /pubmed/33036431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100821 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hao, Genxi
Zhang, Huawei
Chen, Huanchun
Qian, Ping
Li, Xiangmin
Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China
title Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China
title_full Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China
title_fullStr Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China
title_short Comparison of the Pathogenicity of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d Strains from China
title_sort comparison of the pathogenicity of classical swine fever virus subgenotype 2.1c and 2.1d strains from china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100821
work_keys_str_mv AT haogenxi comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina
AT zhanghuawei comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina
AT chenhuanchun comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina
AT qianping comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina
AT lixiangmin comparisonofthepathogenicityofclassicalswinefevervirussubgenotype21cand21dstrainsfromchina