Cargando…
Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer
The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, filling ability, and antibacterial activity of a premixed calcium silicate-based sealer to those of a powder–liquid bioceramic sealer. Ceraseal (CS) and BioRoot (BR) materials were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and en...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32992852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103096 |
_version_ | 1783603114976215040 |
---|---|
author | Kharouf, Naji Arntz, Youri Eid, Ammar Zghal, Jihed Sauro, Salvatore Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide |
author_facet | Kharouf, Naji Arntz, Youri Eid, Ammar Zghal, Jihed Sauro, Salvatore Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide |
author_sort | Kharouf, Naji |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, filling ability, and antibacterial activity of a premixed calcium silicate-based sealer to those of a powder–liquid bioceramic sealer. Ceraseal (CS) and BioRoot (BR) materials were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy at 7 and 14 d of immersion in distilled water. The filling ability of the two sealers as well as the water contact angle, solubility, flow, roughness, crystalline microstructure, pH, and compressive strength were also evaluated. The antibacterial activity was assessed through an agar diffusion as well as through direct tests. All the results were statistically analyzed using one-way or two-way analysis of variance tests. Statistically significant lower void percentages were observed for CS at 2 and 8 mm from the working length (WL) compared to those for the BR group, whilst no significant difference was observed at 5 mm from the WL. BR sealer showed higher alkaline pH, rougher surface, lower water contact angle values, lower flowability, and higher solubility compared to CS. BR showed globular and needle-like crystalline microstructure, whilst CS had globular and flower-like crystalline microstructure up to 72 h. No statistical difference was found for the compressive strength between the two sealers. BR and CS showed no antibacterial effect against Enterococcus faecalis after 3 h, whilst both sealers showed antibacterial capacity after 24 and 72 h. BR demonstrated higher antibacterial activity after 24 h. In conclusion, the use of bioceramic sealers may play an important role in controlling bacterial growth. Moreover, CS may have superior filling ability and lower solubility than the BioRoot sealer due to its specific chemical composition and mixing method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7600315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76003152020-11-01 Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer Kharouf, Naji Arntz, Youri Eid, Ammar Zghal, Jihed Sauro, Salvatore Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide J Clin Med Article The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, filling ability, and antibacterial activity of a premixed calcium silicate-based sealer to those of a powder–liquid bioceramic sealer. Ceraseal (CS) and BioRoot (BR) materials were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy at 7 and 14 d of immersion in distilled water. The filling ability of the two sealers as well as the water contact angle, solubility, flow, roughness, crystalline microstructure, pH, and compressive strength were also evaluated. The antibacterial activity was assessed through an agar diffusion as well as through direct tests. All the results were statistically analyzed using one-way or two-way analysis of variance tests. Statistically significant lower void percentages were observed for CS at 2 and 8 mm from the working length (WL) compared to those for the BR group, whilst no significant difference was observed at 5 mm from the WL. BR sealer showed higher alkaline pH, rougher surface, lower water contact angle values, lower flowability, and higher solubility compared to CS. BR showed globular and needle-like crystalline microstructure, whilst CS had globular and flower-like crystalline microstructure up to 72 h. No statistical difference was found for the compressive strength between the two sealers. BR and CS showed no antibacterial effect against Enterococcus faecalis after 3 h, whilst both sealers showed antibacterial capacity after 24 and 72 h. BR demonstrated higher antibacterial activity after 24 h. In conclusion, the use of bioceramic sealers may play an important role in controlling bacterial growth. Moreover, CS may have superior filling ability and lower solubility than the BioRoot sealer due to its specific chemical composition and mixing method. MDPI 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7600315/ /pubmed/32992852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103096 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kharouf, Naji Arntz, Youri Eid, Ammar Zghal, Jihed Sauro, Salvatore Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer |
title | Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer |
title_full | Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer |
title_fullStr | Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer |
title_full_unstemmed | Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer |
title_short | Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer |
title_sort | physicochemical and antibacterial properties of novel, premixed calcium silicate-based sealer compared to powder–liquid bioceramic sealer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32992852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kharoufnaji physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer AT arntzyouri physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer AT eidammar physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer AT zghaljihed physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer AT saurosalvatore physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer AT haikelyoussef physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer AT mancinodavide physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer |