Cargando…

Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer

The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, filling ability, and antibacterial activity of a premixed calcium silicate-based sealer to those of a powder–liquid bioceramic sealer. Ceraseal (CS) and BioRoot (BR) materials were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kharouf, Naji, Arntz, Youri, Eid, Ammar, Zghal, Jihed, Sauro, Salvatore, Haikel, Youssef, Mancino, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32992852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103096
_version_ 1783603114976215040
author Kharouf, Naji
Arntz, Youri
Eid, Ammar
Zghal, Jihed
Sauro, Salvatore
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
author_facet Kharouf, Naji
Arntz, Youri
Eid, Ammar
Zghal, Jihed
Sauro, Salvatore
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
author_sort Kharouf, Naji
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, filling ability, and antibacterial activity of a premixed calcium silicate-based sealer to those of a powder–liquid bioceramic sealer. Ceraseal (CS) and BioRoot (BR) materials were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy at 7 and 14 d of immersion in distilled water. The filling ability of the two sealers as well as the water contact angle, solubility, flow, roughness, crystalline microstructure, pH, and compressive strength were also evaluated. The antibacterial activity was assessed through an agar diffusion as well as through direct tests. All the results were statistically analyzed using one-way or two-way analysis of variance tests. Statistically significant lower void percentages were observed for CS at 2 and 8 mm from the working length (WL) compared to those for the BR group, whilst no significant difference was observed at 5 mm from the WL. BR sealer showed higher alkaline pH, rougher surface, lower water contact angle values, lower flowability, and higher solubility compared to CS. BR showed globular and needle-like crystalline microstructure, whilst CS had globular and flower-like crystalline microstructure up to 72 h. No statistical difference was found for the compressive strength between the two sealers. BR and CS showed no antibacterial effect against Enterococcus faecalis after 3 h, whilst both sealers showed antibacterial capacity after 24 and 72 h. BR demonstrated higher antibacterial activity after 24 h. In conclusion, the use of bioceramic sealers may play an important role in controlling bacterial growth. Moreover, CS may have superior filling ability and lower solubility than the BioRoot sealer due to its specific chemical composition and mixing method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7600315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76003152020-11-01 Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer Kharouf, Naji Arntz, Youri Eid, Ammar Zghal, Jihed Sauro, Salvatore Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide J Clin Med Article The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, filling ability, and antibacterial activity of a premixed calcium silicate-based sealer to those of a powder–liquid bioceramic sealer. Ceraseal (CS) and BioRoot (BR) materials were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy at 7 and 14 d of immersion in distilled water. The filling ability of the two sealers as well as the water contact angle, solubility, flow, roughness, crystalline microstructure, pH, and compressive strength were also evaluated. The antibacterial activity was assessed through an agar diffusion as well as through direct tests. All the results were statistically analyzed using one-way or two-way analysis of variance tests. Statistically significant lower void percentages were observed for CS at 2 and 8 mm from the working length (WL) compared to those for the BR group, whilst no significant difference was observed at 5 mm from the WL. BR sealer showed higher alkaline pH, rougher surface, lower water contact angle values, lower flowability, and higher solubility compared to CS. BR showed globular and needle-like crystalline microstructure, whilst CS had globular and flower-like crystalline microstructure up to 72 h. No statistical difference was found for the compressive strength between the two sealers. BR and CS showed no antibacterial effect against Enterococcus faecalis after 3 h, whilst both sealers showed antibacterial capacity after 24 and 72 h. BR demonstrated higher antibacterial activity after 24 h. In conclusion, the use of bioceramic sealers may play an important role in controlling bacterial growth. Moreover, CS may have superior filling ability and lower solubility than the BioRoot sealer due to its specific chemical composition and mixing method. MDPI 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7600315/ /pubmed/32992852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103096 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kharouf, Naji
Arntz, Youri
Eid, Ammar
Zghal, Jihed
Sauro, Salvatore
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer
title Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer
title_full Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer
title_fullStr Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer
title_full_unstemmed Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer
title_short Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder–Liquid Bioceramic Sealer
title_sort physicochemical and antibacterial properties of novel, premixed calcium silicate-based sealer compared to powder–liquid bioceramic sealer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32992852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103096
work_keys_str_mv AT kharoufnaji physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer
AT arntzyouri physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer
AT eidammar physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer
AT zghaljihed physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer
AT saurosalvatore physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer
AT haikelyoussef physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer
AT mancinodavide physicochemicalandantibacterialpropertiesofnovelpremixedcalciumsilicatebasedsealercomparedtopowderliquidbioceramicsealer