Cargando…
Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip
Background: Social media has become a source of medical information. Cleft lip and palate is a visible congenital anomaly. The aim of the study was to analyze Instagram(®) posts on the topic of cleft lip. Methods: Instagram(®) posts with “#cleftlip” from March 2014–March 2017 were accessed. Separate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207404 |
_version_ | 1783603136092438528 |
---|---|
author | Sycinska-Dziarnowska, Magdalena Stepien, Piotr Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Jedlinski, Maciej Grassi, Roberta Mazur, Marta |
author_facet | Sycinska-Dziarnowska, Magdalena Stepien, Piotr Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Jedlinski, Maciej Grassi, Roberta Mazur, Marta |
author_sort | Sycinska-Dziarnowska, Magdalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Social media has become a source of medical information. Cleft lip and palate is a visible congenital anomaly. The aim of the study was to analyze Instagram(®) posts on the topic of cleft lip. Methods: Instagram(®) posts with “#cleftlip” from March 2014–March 2017 were accessed. Separate lists of expressions (hashtags, meaningful words, words with emojis or emojis alone) were prepared for primary posts and for replies. Thirty expressions statistically most frequent in primary versus secondary posts and 30 in secondary versus primary posts were identified (Group 1) as well as 30 English words or hashtags (Group 2), non-English words or hashtags (Group 3) and emojis (Group 4). The frequencies of expressions were compared (Z-test for the difference of two population proportions). Results: There were 34,129 posts, (5427 primary posts and 28,702 replies), containing 62,163 expressions, (35,004 in primary posts). The occurrence of all expressions was 454,162, (225,418 in primary posts and 228,744 in replies). Posts with positive expressions such as “beautiful”, “love”, “cute”, “great”, “awesome” occurred more often than these with negative ones. In replies all emojis were positive. Conclusions: Numerous Instagram(®) posts referring to cleft lip are published and do provoke discussion. People express their solidarity and sympathize with persons affected by cleft. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7600405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76004052020-11-01 Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip Sycinska-Dziarnowska, Magdalena Stepien, Piotr Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Jedlinski, Maciej Grassi, Roberta Mazur, Marta Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Social media has become a source of medical information. Cleft lip and palate is a visible congenital anomaly. The aim of the study was to analyze Instagram(®) posts on the topic of cleft lip. Methods: Instagram(®) posts with “#cleftlip” from March 2014–March 2017 were accessed. Separate lists of expressions (hashtags, meaningful words, words with emojis or emojis alone) were prepared for primary posts and for replies. Thirty expressions statistically most frequent in primary versus secondary posts and 30 in secondary versus primary posts were identified (Group 1) as well as 30 English words or hashtags (Group 2), non-English words or hashtags (Group 3) and emojis (Group 4). The frequencies of expressions were compared (Z-test for the difference of two population proportions). Results: There were 34,129 posts, (5427 primary posts and 28,702 replies), containing 62,163 expressions, (35,004 in primary posts). The occurrence of all expressions was 454,162, (225,418 in primary posts and 228,744 in replies). Posts with positive expressions such as “beautiful”, “love”, “cute”, “great”, “awesome” occurred more often than these with negative ones. In replies all emojis were positive. Conclusions: Numerous Instagram(®) posts referring to cleft lip are published and do provoke discussion. People express their solidarity and sympathize with persons affected by cleft. MDPI 2020-10-12 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7600405/ /pubmed/33053698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207404 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sycinska-Dziarnowska, Magdalena Stepien, Piotr Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Jedlinski, Maciej Grassi, Roberta Mazur, Marta Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip |
title | Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip |
title_full | Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip |
title_short | Analysis of Instagram(®) Posts Referring to Cleft Lip |
title_sort | analysis of instagram(®) posts referring to cleft lip |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sycinskadziarnowskamagdalena analysisofinstagrampostsreferringtocleftlip AT stepienpiotr analysisofinstagrampostsreferringtocleftlip AT janiszewskaolszowskajoanna analysisofinstagrampostsreferringtocleftlip AT grocholewiczkatarzyna analysisofinstagrampostsreferringtocleftlip AT jedlinskimaciej analysisofinstagrampostsreferringtocleftlip AT grassiroberta analysisofinstagrampostsreferringtocleftlip AT mazurmarta analysisofinstagrampostsreferringtocleftlip |