Cargando…

Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10

The purpose of this study was to validate the construct and reliability of an instrument to assess the work environment as a single tool based on quality of life (QL), quality of work life (QWL), and organizational climate (OC). The methodology tested the construct validity through Exploratory Facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Barros Ahrens, Rudy, da Silva Lirani, Luciana, de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364
_version_ 1783603164540305408
author de Barros Ahrens, Rudy
da Silva Lirani, Luciana
de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
author_facet de Barros Ahrens, Rudy
da Silva Lirani, Luciana
de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
author_sort de Barros Ahrens, Rudy
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to validate the construct and reliability of an instrument to assess the work environment as a single tool based on quality of life (QL), quality of work life (QWL), and organizational climate (OC). The methodology tested the construct validity through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability through Cronbach’s alpha. The EFA returned a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.917; which demonstrated that the data were adequate for the factor analysis; and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ² = 7465.349; Df = 1225; p ≤ 0.000). After the EFA; the varimax rotation method was employed for a factor through commonality analysis; reducing the 14 initial factors to 10. Only question 30 presented commonality lower than 0.5; and the other questions returned values higher than 0.5 in the commonality analysis. Regarding the reliability of the instrument; all of the questions presented reliability as the values varied between 0.953 and 0.956. Thus; the instrument demonstrated construct validity and reliability
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7600521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76005212020-11-01 Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 de Barros Ahrens, Rudy da Silva Lirani, Luciana de Francisco, Antonio Carlos Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The purpose of this study was to validate the construct and reliability of an instrument to assess the work environment as a single tool based on quality of life (QL), quality of work life (QWL), and organizational climate (OC). The methodology tested the construct validity through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability through Cronbach’s alpha. The EFA returned a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.917; which demonstrated that the data were adequate for the factor analysis; and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ² = 7465.349; Df = 1225; p ≤ 0.000). After the EFA; the varimax rotation method was employed for a factor through commonality analysis; reducing the 14 initial factors to 10. Only question 30 presented commonality lower than 0.5; and the other questions returned values higher than 0.5 in the commonality analysis. Regarding the reliability of the instrument; all of the questions presented reliability as the values varied between 0.953 and 0.956. Thus; the instrument demonstrated construct validity and reliability MDPI 2020-10-09 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7600521/ /pubmed/33050197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Barros Ahrens, Rudy
da Silva Lirani, Luciana
de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10
title Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10
title_full Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10
title_fullStr Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10
title_full_unstemmed Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10
title_short Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10
title_sort construct validity and reliability of the work environment assessment instrument we-10
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364
work_keys_str_mv AT debarrosahrensrudy constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheworkenvironmentassessmentinstrumentwe10
AT dasilvaliraniluciana constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheworkenvironmentassessmentinstrumentwe10
AT defranciscoantoniocarlos constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheworkenvironmentassessmentinstrumentwe10