Cargando…
Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10
The purpose of this study was to validate the construct and reliability of an instrument to assess the work environment as a single tool based on quality of life (QL), quality of work life (QWL), and organizational climate (OC). The methodology tested the construct validity through Exploratory Facto...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364 |
_version_ | 1783603164540305408 |
---|---|
author | de Barros Ahrens, Rudy da Silva Lirani, Luciana de Francisco, Antonio Carlos |
author_facet | de Barros Ahrens, Rudy da Silva Lirani, Luciana de Francisco, Antonio Carlos |
author_sort | de Barros Ahrens, Rudy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to validate the construct and reliability of an instrument to assess the work environment as a single tool based on quality of life (QL), quality of work life (QWL), and organizational climate (OC). The methodology tested the construct validity through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability through Cronbach’s alpha. The EFA returned a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.917; which demonstrated that the data were adequate for the factor analysis; and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ² = 7465.349; Df = 1225; p ≤ 0.000). After the EFA; the varimax rotation method was employed for a factor through commonality analysis; reducing the 14 initial factors to 10. Only question 30 presented commonality lower than 0.5; and the other questions returned values higher than 0.5 in the commonality analysis. Regarding the reliability of the instrument; all of the questions presented reliability as the values varied between 0.953 and 0.956. Thus; the instrument demonstrated construct validity and reliability |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7600521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76005212020-11-01 Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 de Barros Ahrens, Rudy da Silva Lirani, Luciana de Francisco, Antonio Carlos Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The purpose of this study was to validate the construct and reliability of an instrument to assess the work environment as a single tool based on quality of life (QL), quality of work life (QWL), and organizational climate (OC). The methodology tested the construct validity through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability through Cronbach’s alpha. The EFA returned a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.917; which demonstrated that the data were adequate for the factor analysis; and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ² = 7465.349; Df = 1225; p ≤ 0.000). After the EFA; the varimax rotation method was employed for a factor through commonality analysis; reducing the 14 initial factors to 10. Only question 30 presented commonality lower than 0.5; and the other questions returned values higher than 0.5 in the commonality analysis. Regarding the reliability of the instrument; all of the questions presented reliability as the values varied between 0.953 and 0.956. Thus; the instrument demonstrated construct validity and reliability MDPI 2020-10-09 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7600521/ /pubmed/33050197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article de Barros Ahrens, Rudy da Silva Lirani, Luciana de Francisco, Antonio Carlos Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 |
title | Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 |
title_full | Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 |
title_fullStr | Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 |
title_full_unstemmed | Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 |
title_short | Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10 |
title_sort | construct validity and reliability of the work environment assessment instrument we-10 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debarrosahrensrudy constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheworkenvironmentassessmentinstrumentwe10 AT dasilvaliraniluciana constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheworkenvironmentassessmentinstrumentwe10 AT defranciscoantoniocarlos constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheworkenvironmentassessmentinstrumentwe10 |