Cargando…

Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and clinical success rate, complications, and patients’ quality of life after computer-aided rehabilitation supported by zygomatic implants in cases of severe maxillary atrophy (ten patients) and in bone defects in oncologic patients (ten patients)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pellegrino, Gerardo, Basile, Francesco, Relics, Daniela, Ferri, Agnese, Grande, Francesco, Tarsitano, Achille, Marchetti, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053696
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103254
_version_ 1783603244232081408
author Pellegrino, Gerardo
Basile, Francesco
Relics, Daniela
Ferri, Agnese
Grande, Francesco
Tarsitano, Achille
Marchetti, Claudio
author_facet Pellegrino, Gerardo
Basile, Francesco
Relics, Daniela
Ferri, Agnese
Grande, Francesco
Tarsitano, Achille
Marchetti, Claudio
author_sort Pellegrino, Gerardo
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and clinical success rate, complications, and patients’ quality of life after computer-aided rehabilitation supported by zygomatic implants in cases of severe maxillary atrophy (ten patients) and in bone defects in oncologic patients (ten patients). All patients underwent computer-aided planning and surgery. Seventy-three zygomatic implants were placed. The mean follow-up period was 39.9 months. Implant survival and clinical success rate, the effectiveness of planning the implant length, biological and prosthetic complications, and the quality of life were evaluated. The five-year implant survival rate for patients with maxillary atrophy and oncologic patients was 97.4% and 96.7%, respectively. The prosthetic survival rate was 100%. Two implant failures occurred in the first year. One implant failure was observed in each group. Minor biological and prosthetic complications occurred in both groups without significant differences. All complications were managed without affecting the treatment. The quality of life increased by 71.3% in the atrophic group and by 82.9% in the oncologic group. Zygomatic implant rehabilitation seems to be a reliable technique for patients with maxillary atrophy and for oncologic patients. The three-dimensional computer-aided approach allows the surgeon to plan the surgery and increase its predictability. Early prosthesis loading certainly allows for better functional outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7600816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76008162020-11-01 Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up Pellegrino, Gerardo Basile, Francesco Relics, Daniela Ferri, Agnese Grande, Francesco Tarsitano, Achille Marchetti, Claudio J Clin Med Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and clinical success rate, complications, and patients’ quality of life after computer-aided rehabilitation supported by zygomatic implants in cases of severe maxillary atrophy (ten patients) and in bone defects in oncologic patients (ten patients). All patients underwent computer-aided planning and surgery. Seventy-three zygomatic implants were placed. The mean follow-up period was 39.9 months. Implant survival and clinical success rate, the effectiveness of planning the implant length, biological and prosthetic complications, and the quality of life were evaluated. The five-year implant survival rate for patients with maxillary atrophy and oncologic patients was 97.4% and 96.7%, respectively. The prosthetic survival rate was 100%. Two implant failures occurred in the first year. One implant failure was observed in each group. Minor biological and prosthetic complications occurred in both groups without significant differences. All complications were managed without affecting the treatment. The quality of life increased by 71.3% in the atrophic group and by 82.9% in the oncologic group. Zygomatic implant rehabilitation seems to be a reliable technique for patients with maxillary atrophy and for oncologic patients. The three-dimensional computer-aided approach allows the surgeon to plan the surgery and increase its predictability. Early prosthesis loading certainly allows for better functional outcomes. MDPI 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7600816/ /pubmed/33053696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103254 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pellegrino, Gerardo
Basile, Francesco
Relics, Daniela
Ferri, Agnese
Grande, Francesco
Tarsitano, Achille
Marchetti, Claudio
Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up
title Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up
title_full Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up
title_fullStr Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up
title_short Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up
title_sort computer-aided rehabilitation supported by zygomatic implants: a cohort study comparing atrophic with oncologic patients after five years of follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053696
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103254
work_keys_str_mv AT pellegrinogerardo computeraidedrehabilitationsupportedbyzygomaticimplantsacohortstudycomparingatrophicwithoncologicpatientsafterfiveyearsoffollowup
AT basilefrancesco computeraidedrehabilitationsupportedbyzygomaticimplantsacohortstudycomparingatrophicwithoncologicpatientsafterfiveyearsoffollowup
AT relicsdaniela computeraidedrehabilitationsupportedbyzygomaticimplantsacohortstudycomparingatrophicwithoncologicpatientsafterfiveyearsoffollowup
AT ferriagnese computeraidedrehabilitationsupportedbyzygomaticimplantsacohortstudycomparingatrophicwithoncologicpatientsafterfiveyearsoffollowup
AT grandefrancesco computeraidedrehabilitationsupportedbyzygomaticimplantsacohortstudycomparingatrophicwithoncologicpatientsafterfiveyearsoffollowup
AT tarsitanoachille computeraidedrehabilitationsupportedbyzygomaticimplantsacohortstudycomparingatrophicwithoncologicpatientsafterfiveyearsoffollowup
AT marchetticlaudio computeraidedrehabilitationsupportedbyzygomaticimplantsacohortstudycomparingatrophicwithoncologicpatientsafterfiveyearsoffollowup