Cargando…
Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data
Background and objectives: For proper antimicrobial therapy, cumulative antibiograms should be representative of geographic region and be accurate. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines recommend that only the first isolates (FI) of a species per patient are used when reporti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56100507 |
_version_ | 1783603286275784704 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sollip Yoo, Soo Jin Chang, Jeonghyun |
author_facet | Kim, Sollip Yoo, Soo Jin Chang, Jeonghyun |
author_sort | Kim, Sollip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objectives: For proper antimicrobial therapy, cumulative antibiograms should be representative of geographic region and be accurate. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines recommend that only the first isolates (FI) of a species per patient are used when reporting cumulative antibiograms. However, >50% of hospitals in the United States report antibiograms of all isolates. We compared antibiograms from the FI with those from total isolates (TI). Materials and Methods: Antimicrobial data of all isolates identified in the Microbiology unit of Ilsan Paik Hospital in 2019 were retrospectively acquired from the hospital information system. The susceptibility rates to antimicrobials of Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis were analyzed by FI and TI, respectively. Isolate counts and susceptibility rates of each species for the reported antimicrobials were compared. Results: The numbers of isolates by FI/TI were as follows: 1824/2692 E. coli, 480/1611 A. baumannii, and 662/1306 K. pneumoniae, and 407/953 P. aeruginosa for gram-negative bacteria and 649/1364 S. aureus, 211/313 E. faecium, and 323/394 E. faecalis for gram-positive bacteria. All antimicrobial agents showed higher susceptibility rates when calculated as FI than as TI in gram-negative bacteria except colistin: 3.7% for E. coli, 14.5% for A. baumannii, 8.3% for K. pneumoniae, and 7.9% for P. aeruginosa. In S. aureus, 8/11 antimicrobial agents revealed higher susceptibility rates for FI than for TI. E. faecalis and E. faecium showed lower susceptibility rates for 7/10 antimicrobial agents for FI than for TI. The oxacillin susceptibility rates of S. aureus were 36.6%/30.2% with FI/TI and vancomycin susceptibility rates for E. faecium were 54.1% and 49.5%, respectively. Conclusions: When comparing cumulative antibiograms by FI with TI using real-world data, there is a large gap for critical species requiring hospital infection control. Although FI calculation is difficult, antibiograms must be calculated as FI for proper preemptive antimicrobial therapy because FI provides proper antimicrobial susceptibility data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7600976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76009762020-11-01 Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data Kim, Sollip Yoo, Soo Jin Chang, Jeonghyun Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: For proper antimicrobial therapy, cumulative antibiograms should be representative of geographic region and be accurate. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines recommend that only the first isolates (FI) of a species per patient are used when reporting cumulative antibiograms. However, >50% of hospitals in the United States report antibiograms of all isolates. We compared antibiograms from the FI with those from total isolates (TI). Materials and Methods: Antimicrobial data of all isolates identified in the Microbiology unit of Ilsan Paik Hospital in 2019 were retrospectively acquired from the hospital information system. The susceptibility rates to antimicrobials of Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis were analyzed by FI and TI, respectively. Isolate counts and susceptibility rates of each species for the reported antimicrobials were compared. Results: The numbers of isolates by FI/TI were as follows: 1824/2692 E. coli, 480/1611 A. baumannii, and 662/1306 K. pneumoniae, and 407/953 P. aeruginosa for gram-negative bacteria and 649/1364 S. aureus, 211/313 E. faecium, and 323/394 E. faecalis for gram-positive bacteria. All antimicrobial agents showed higher susceptibility rates when calculated as FI than as TI in gram-negative bacteria except colistin: 3.7% for E. coli, 14.5% for A. baumannii, 8.3% for K. pneumoniae, and 7.9% for P. aeruginosa. In S. aureus, 8/11 antimicrobial agents revealed higher susceptibility rates for FI than for TI. E. faecalis and E. faecium showed lower susceptibility rates for 7/10 antimicrobial agents for FI than for TI. The oxacillin susceptibility rates of S. aureus were 36.6%/30.2% with FI/TI and vancomycin susceptibility rates for E. faecium were 54.1% and 49.5%, respectively. Conclusions: When comparing cumulative antibiograms by FI with TI using real-world data, there is a large gap for critical species requiring hospital infection control. Although FI calculation is difficult, antibiograms must be calculated as FI for proper preemptive antimicrobial therapy because FI provides proper antimicrobial susceptibility data. MDPI 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7600976/ /pubmed/32998192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56100507 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Sollip Yoo, Soo Jin Chang, Jeonghyun Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data |
title | Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data |
title_full | Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data |
title_fullStr | Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data |
title_short | Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data |
title_sort | importance of susceptibility rate of ‘the first’ isolate: evidence of real-world data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56100507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsollip importanceofsusceptibilityrateofthefirstisolateevidenceofrealworlddata AT yoosoojin importanceofsusceptibilityrateofthefirstisolateevidenceofrealworlddata AT changjeonghyun importanceofsusceptibilityrateofthefirstisolateevidenceofrealworlddata |