Cargando…

Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data

Background and objectives: For proper antimicrobial therapy, cumulative antibiograms should be representative of geographic region and be accurate. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines recommend that only the first isolates (FI) of a species per patient are used when reporti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sollip, Yoo, Soo Jin, Chang, Jeonghyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56100507
_version_ 1783603286275784704
author Kim, Sollip
Yoo, Soo Jin
Chang, Jeonghyun
author_facet Kim, Sollip
Yoo, Soo Jin
Chang, Jeonghyun
author_sort Kim, Sollip
collection PubMed
description Background and objectives: For proper antimicrobial therapy, cumulative antibiograms should be representative of geographic region and be accurate. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines recommend that only the first isolates (FI) of a species per patient are used when reporting cumulative antibiograms. However, >50% of hospitals in the United States report antibiograms of all isolates. We compared antibiograms from the FI with those from total isolates (TI). Materials and Methods: Antimicrobial data of all isolates identified in the Microbiology unit of Ilsan Paik Hospital in 2019 were retrospectively acquired from the hospital information system. The susceptibility rates to antimicrobials of Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis were analyzed by FI and TI, respectively. Isolate counts and susceptibility rates of each species for the reported antimicrobials were compared. Results: The numbers of isolates by FI/TI were as follows: 1824/2692 E. coli, 480/1611 A. baumannii, and 662/1306 K. pneumoniae, and 407/953 P. aeruginosa for gram-negative bacteria and 649/1364 S. aureus, 211/313 E. faecium, and 323/394 E. faecalis for gram-positive bacteria. All antimicrobial agents showed higher susceptibility rates when calculated as FI than as TI in gram-negative bacteria except colistin: 3.7% for E. coli, 14.5% for A. baumannii, 8.3% for K. pneumoniae, and 7.9% for P. aeruginosa. In S. aureus, 8/11 antimicrobial agents revealed higher susceptibility rates for FI than for TI. E. faecalis and E. faecium showed lower susceptibility rates for 7/10 antimicrobial agents for FI than for TI. The oxacillin susceptibility rates of S. aureus were 36.6%/30.2% with FI/TI and vancomycin susceptibility rates for E. faecium were 54.1% and 49.5%, respectively. Conclusions: When comparing cumulative antibiograms by FI with TI using real-world data, there is a large gap for critical species requiring hospital infection control. Although FI calculation is difficult, antibiograms must be calculated as FI for proper preemptive antimicrobial therapy because FI provides proper antimicrobial susceptibility data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7600976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76009762020-11-01 Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data Kim, Sollip Yoo, Soo Jin Chang, Jeonghyun Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: For proper antimicrobial therapy, cumulative antibiograms should be representative of geographic region and be accurate. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines recommend that only the first isolates (FI) of a species per patient are used when reporting cumulative antibiograms. However, >50% of hospitals in the United States report antibiograms of all isolates. We compared antibiograms from the FI with those from total isolates (TI). Materials and Methods: Antimicrobial data of all isolates identified in the Microbiology unit of Ilsan Paik Hospital in 2019 were retrospectively acquired from the hospital information system. The susceptibility rates to antimicrobials of Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis were analyzed by FI and TI, respectively. Isolate counts and susceptibility rates of each species for the reported antimicrobials were compared. Results: The numbers of isolates by FI/TI were as follows: 1824/2692 E. coli, 480/1611 A. baumannii, and 662/1306 K. pneumoniae, and 407/953 P. aeruginosa for gram-negative bacteria and 649/1364 S. aureus, 211/313 E. faecium, and 323/394 E. faecalis for gram-positive bacteria. All antimicrobial agents showed higher susceptibility rates when calculated as FI than as TI in gram-negative bacteria except colistin: 3.7% for E. coli, 14.5% for A. baumannii, 8.3% for K. pneumoniae, and 7.9% for P. aeruginosa. In S. aureus, 8/11 antimicrobial agents revealed higher susceptibility rates for FI than for TI. E. faecalis and E. faecium showed lower susceptibility rates for 7/10 antimicrobial agents for FI than for TI. The oxacillin susceptibility rates of S. aureus were 36.6%/30.2% with FI/TI and vancomycin susceptibility rates for E. faecium were 54.1% and 49.5%, respectively. Conclusions: When comparing cumulative antibiograms by FI with TI using real-world data, there is a large gap for critical species requiring hospital infection control. Although FI calculation is difficult, antibiograms must be calculated as FI for proper preemptive antimicrobial therapy because FI provides proper antimicrobial susceptibility data. MDPI 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7600976/ /pubmed/32998192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56100507 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Sollip
Yoo, Soo Jin
Chang, Jeonghyun
Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data
title Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data
title_full Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data
title_fullStr Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data
title_full_unstemmed Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data
title_short Importance of Susceptibility Rate of ‘the First’ Isolate: Evidence of Real-World Data
title_sort importance of susceptibility rate of ‘the first’ isolate: evidence of real-world data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56100507
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsollip importanceofsusceptibilityrateofthefirstisolateevidenceofrealworlddata
AT yoosoojin importanceofsusceptibilityrateofthefirstisolateevidenceofrealworlddata
AT changjeonghyun importanceofsusceptibilityrateofthefirstisolateevidenceofrealworlddata