Cargando…

Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Alfalfa silage, owing to its chemical composition, complements maize silage in many rations for dairy cows. The disadvantages of alfalfa are the high soil requirements, agrotechnical treatments and sensitivity to cold and flooding. Many dairy farms are unable to grow alfalfa because...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purwin, Cezary, Nogalski, Zenon, Starczewski, Maciej, Czurgiel, Sylwia, Fijałkowska, Maja, Momot, Martyna, Borsuk, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993036
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101746
_version_ 1783603291053096960
author Purwin, Cezary
Nogalski, Zenon
Starczewski, Maciej
Czurgiel, Sylwia
Fijałkowska, Maja
Momot, Martyna
Borsuk, Marta
author_facet Purwin, Cezary
Nogalski, Zenon
Starczewski, Maciej
Czurgiel, Sylwia
Fijałkowska, Maja
Momot, Martyna
Borsuk, Marta
author_sort Purwin, Cezary
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Alfalfa silage, owing to its chemical composition, complements maize silage in many rations for dairy cows. The disadvantages of alfalfa are the high soil requirements, agrotechnical treatments and sensitivity to cold and flooding. Many dairy farms are unable to grow alfalfa because of poor quality of the soils, and grass crops are unreliable due to increasing drought. For this reason, alternative plants are being sought out to produce feeds for dairy cows. So far, Virginia fanpetals has been used as an energy source, but thanks to its high levels of protein (17–25%), the possibility of using it in cattle feed has been recognized. Virginia fanpetals grows well in poor quality soils, in difficult climatic conditions (frost, drought), with no need for annual treatments, and the harvest is carried out with maize harvesting equipment. To date, no studies have been carried out on the possibility of replacing alfalfa with Virginia fanpetals in the diets of dairy cows. Based on our results, it was concluded that Virginia fanpetals is a good source of protein and can be a substitute or supplement to alfalfa silage. The best production results were obtained with half-substitution of alfalfa silage by Virginia fanpetals silage in diets based on maize silage. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of partial or complete substitution of alfalfa silage with Virginia fanpetals silage in rations based on maize silage on feed intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation and milk yield and physicochemical characteristics. Nine Polish Holstein Friesian cows in the second half of lactation were fed three experimental diets in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design as follows: maize silage + alfalfa silage, maize silage + alfalfa silage and Virginia fanpetals silage in a 50:50 ratio, maize silage + Virginia fanpetals silage. Complete substitution caused an increase in dry matter intake (DMI), total volatile fatty acids (VFA), acetic acid to propionic acid (A/P) ratio, N-NH(3) in the rumen contents and milk urea and a decrease in the feed conversion ratio. The partial and complete substitution changed the profile of milk fatty acids, resulting in a slight increase in saturated fatty acids (SFA) and a decrease in unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) as well as in all functional fatty acids except vaccenic acid. The most promising production effects were achieved through partial substitution of alfalfa silage with the Virginia fanpetals silage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7600994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76009942020-11-01 Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows Purwin, Cezary Nogalski, Zenon Starczewski, Maciej Czurgiel, Sylwia Fijałkowska, Maja Momot, Martyna Borsuk, Marta Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Alfalfa silage, owing to its chemical composition, complements maize silage in many rations for dairy cows. The disadvantages of alfalfa are the high soil requirements, agrotechnical treatments and sensitivity to cold and flooding. Many dairy farms are unable to grow alfalfa because of poor quality of the soils, and grass crops are unreliable due to increasing drought. For this reason, alternative plants are being sought out to produce feeds for dairy cows. So far, Virginia fanpetals has been used as an energy source, but thanks to its high levels of protein (17–25%), the possibility of using it in cattle feed has been recognized. Virginia fanpetals grows well in poor quality soils, in difficult climatic conditions (frost, drought), with no need for annual treatments, and the harvest is carried out with maize harvesting equipment. To date, no studies have been carried out on the possibility of replacing alfalfa with Virginia fanpetals in the diets of dairy cows. Based on our results, it was concluded that Virginia fanpetals is a good source of protein and can be a substitute or supplement to alfalfa silage. The best production results were obtained with half-substitution of alfalfa silage by Virginia fanpetals silage in diets based on maize silage. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of partial or complete substitution of alfalfa silage with Virginia fanpetals silage in rations based on maize silage on feed intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation and milk yield and physicochemical characteristics. Nine Polish Holstein Friesian cows in the second half of lactation were fed three experimental diets in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design as follows: maize silage + alfalfa silage, maize silage + alfalfa silage and Virginia fanpetals silage in a 50:50 ratio, maize silage + Virginia fanpetals silage. Complete substitution caused an increase in dry matter intake (DMI), total volatile fatty acids (VFA), acetic acid to propionic acid (A/P) ratio, N-NH(3) in the rumen contents and milk urea and a decrease in the feed conversion ratio. The partial and complete substitution changed the profile of milk fatty acids, resulting in a slight increase in saturated fatty acids (SFA) and a decrease in unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) as well as in all functional fatty acids except vaccenic acid. The most promising production effects were achieved through partial substitution of alfalfa silage with the Virginia fanpetals silage. MDPI 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7600994/ /pubmed/32993036 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101746 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Purwin, Cezary
Nogalski, Zenon
Starczewski, Maciej
Czurgiel, Sylwia
Fijałkowska, Maja
Momot, Martyna
Borsuk, Marta
Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows
title Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows
title_full Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows
title_fullStr Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows
title_short Effects of Dietary Substitution of Alfalfa Silage with Virginia Fanpetals Silage in Lactating Polish Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows
title_sort effects of dietary substitution of alfalfa silage with virginia fanpetals silage in lactating polish holstein friesian dairy cows
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7600994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993036
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101746
work_keys_str_mv AT purwincezary effectsofdietarysubstitutionofalfalfasilagewithvirginiafanpetalssilageinlactatingpolishholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT nogalskizenon effectsofdietarysubstitutionofalfalfasilagewithvirginiafanpetalssilageinlactatingpolishholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT starczewskimaciej effectsofdietarysubstitutionofalfalfasilagewithvirginiafanpetalssilageinlactatingpolishholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT czurgielsylwia effectsofdietarysubstitutionofalfalfasilagewithvirginiafanpetalssilageinlactatingpolishholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT fijałkowskamaja effectsofdietarysubstitutionofalfalfasilagewithvirginiafanpetalssilageinlactatingpolishholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT momotmartyna effectsofdietarysubstitutionofalfalfasilagewithvirginiafanpetalssilageinlactatingpolishholsteinfriesiandairycows
AT borsukmarta effectsofdietarysubstitutionofalfalfasilagewithvirginiafanpetalssilageinlactatingpolishholsteinfriesiandairycows