Cargando…

The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Introducing alternatives to surgical castration of pigs bring welfare and economical benefits, but also reveal several quality-related issues. Most important is the presence of boar taint, but also includes low quantity and quality of fat, meat texture and color deviations in additio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Škrlep, Martin, Tomašević, Igor, Mörlein, Daniel, Novaković, Saša, Egea, Macarena, Garrido, María Dolores, Linares, María Belén, Peñaranda, Irene, Aluwé, Marijke, Font-i-Furnols, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7601181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101754
_version_ 1783603344452878336
author Škrlep, Martin
Tomašević, Igor
Mörlein, Daniel
Novaković, Saša
Egea, Macarena
Garrido, María Dolores
Linares, María Belén
Peñaranda, Irene
Aluwé, Marijke
Font-i-Furnols, Maria
author_facet Škrlep, Martin
Tomašević, Igor
Mörlein, Daniel
Novaković, Saša
Egea, Macarena
Garrido, María Dolores
Linares, María Belén
Peñaranda, Irene
Aluwé, Marijke
Font-i-Furnols, Maria
author_sort Škrlep, Martin
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Introducing alternatives to surgical castration of pigs bring welfare and economical benefits, but also reveal several quality-related issues. Most important is the presence of boar taint, but also includes low quantity and quality of fat, meat texture and color deviations in addition to inferior water binding properties, most of them negatively influencing meat product characteristics. The present paper highlights the important differences between the conventionally used surgical castrates and the most likely introduced alternatives: entire males and immunocastrates. Based on the review of the available research, the possible reasons for quality alterations are elaborated according to the type of meat product and recommendations for improving product quality or preventing boar taint perception are given. ABSTRACT: Due to the strong public initiative in Europe and increased regulator focus to mitigate pain, surgical castration of pigs is being gradually abandoned, while the importance of other sex categories like entire males (EM) and immunocastrates (IC) increases. Although beneficial for animal welfare and economics, their use also brings forward several quality problems. Besides the occurrence of boar taint in EM, these include excessive carcass leanness, softer fat, meat color and pH deviations, inferior water holding capacity and increased meat toughness. In this paper, the raw material differences between the male sex categories and their influence on product quality are reviewed, and possible solutions are presented. Using EM for dried or thermally processed products may result in lower processing yields and inferior sensory quality, which may partially be prevented by applying specific processing adaptations. Immunocastration is a viable solution, especially when prolonging the vaccination to slaughter interval. Low to medium levels of boar taint can be effectively managed in most of the meat products, applying procedures like cooking, microbial inoculation or masking (by spices and especially smoking), while highly tainted material can be valorized only by combining various methods and/or with dilution of the tainted meat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7601181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76011812020-11-01 The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations Škrlep, Martin Tomašević, Igor Mörlein, Daniel Novaković, Saša Egea, Macarena Garrido, María Dolores Linares, María Belén Peñaranda, Irene Aluwé, Marijke Font-i-Furnols, Maria Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Introducing alternatives to surgical castration of pigs bring welfare and economical benefits, but also reveal several quality-related issues. Most important is the presence of boar taint, but also includes low quantity and quality of fat, meat texture and color deviations in addition to inferior water binding properties, most of them negatively influencing meat product characteristics. The present paper highlights the important differences between the conventionally used surgical castrates and the most likely introduced alternatives: entire males and immunocastrates. Based on the review of the available research, the possible reasons for quality alterations are elaborated according to the type of meat product and recommendations for improving product quality or preventing boar taint perception are given. ABSTRACT: Due to the strong public initiative in Europe and increased regulator focus to mitigate pain, surgical castration of pigs is being gradually abandoned, while the importance of other sex categories like entire males (EM) and immunocastrates (IC) increases. Although beneficial for animal welfare and economics, their use also brings forward several quality problems. Besides the occurrence of boar taint in EM, these include excessive carcass leanness, softer fat, meat color and pH deviations, inferior water holding capacity and increased meat toughness. In this paper, the raw material differences between the male sex categories and their influence on product quality are reviewed, and possible solutions are presented. Using EM for dried or thermally processed products may result in lower processing yields and inferior sensory quality, which may partially be prevented by applying specific processing adaptations. Immunocastration is a viable solution, especially when prolonging the vaccination to slaughter interval. Low to medium levels of boar taint can be effectively managed in most of the meat products, applying procedures like cooking, microbial inoculation or masking (by spices and especially smoking), while highly tainted material can be valorized only by combining various methods and/or with dilution of the tainted meat. MDPI 2020-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7601181/ /pubmed/32993171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101754 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Škrlep, Martin
Tomašević, Igor
Mörlein, Daniel
Novaković, Saša
Egea, Macarena
Garrido, María Dolores
Linares, María Belén
Peñaranda, Irene
Aluwé, Marijke
Font-i-Furnols, Maria
The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations
title The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations
title_full The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations
title_fullStr The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations
title_short The Use of Pork from Entire Male and Immunocastrated Pigs for Meat Products—An Overview with Recommendations
title_sort use of pork from entire male and immunocastrated pigs for meat products—an overview with recommendations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7601181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101754
work_keys_str_mv AT skrlepmartin theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT tomasevicigor theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT morleindaniel theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT novakovicsasa theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT egeamacarena theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT garridomariadolores theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT linaresmariabelen theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT penarandairene theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT aluwemarijke theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT fontifurnolsmaria theuseofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT skrlepmartin useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT tomasevicigor useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT morleindaniel useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT novakovicsasa useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT egeamacarena useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT garridomariadolores useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT linaresmariabelen useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT penarandairene useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT aluwemarijke useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations
AT fontifurnolsmaria useofporkfromentiremaleandimmunocastratedpigsformeatproductsanoverviewwithrecommendations