Cargando…
Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment
Despite the potential applicability of the combination between aluminium (anode) and graphite or titanium (cathode) for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment, their technical and economic feasibilities have not been comprehensively captured. In this study, aluminium (anode) and graphite and ti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7601237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13204489 |
_version_ | 1783603360582074368 |
---|---|
author | Meiramkulova, Kulyash Devrishov, Davud Marzanov, Nurbiy Marzanova, Saida Kydyrbekova, Aliya Uryumtseva, Tatyana Tastanova, Lyazzat Mkilima, Timoth |
author_facet | Meiramkulova, Kulyash Devrishov, Davud Marzanov, Nurbiy Marzanova, Saida Kydyrbekova, Aliya Uryumtseva, Tatyana Tastanova, Lyazzat Mkilima, Timoth |
author_sort | Meiramkulova, Kulyash |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the potential applicability of the combination between aluminium (anode) and graphite or titanium (cathode) for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment, their technical and economic feasibilities have not been comprehensively captured. In this study, aluminium (anode) and graphite and titanium as cathode electrode materials were investigated and compared in terms of their performance on poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. The wastewater samples collected from the Izhevsk Production Corporative (PC) poultry farm in Kazakhstan were treated using a lab-based electrochemical treatment plant and then analyzed after every 20 and 40 min of the treatment processes. Cost analysis for both electrode combinations was also performed. From the analysis results, the aluminium–graphite electrode combination achieved high removal efficiency from turbidity, color, nitrite, phosphates, and chemical oxygen demand, with removal efficiency ranging from 72% to 98% after 20 min, as well as 88% to 100% after 40 min. A similar phenomenon was also observed from the aluminium–titanium electrode combination, with high removal efficiency achieved from turbidity, color, total suspended solids, nitrite, phosphates, and chemical oxygen demand, ranging from 81% to 100% after 20 min as well as from 91% to 100% after 40 min. This means the treatment performances for both aluminium–graphite and aluminium–titanium electrode combinations were highly affected by the contact time. The general performance in terms of removal efficiency indicates that the aluminium–titanium electrode combination outperformed the aluminium–graphite electrode combination. However, the inert character of the graphite electrode led to a positive impact on the total operating cost. Therefore, the aluminium–graphite electrode combination was observed to be cheaper than the aluminium–titanium electrode combination in terms of the operating cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7601237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76012372020-11-01 Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment Meiramkulova, Kulyash Devrishov, Davud Marzanov, Nurbiy Marzanova, Saida Kydyrbekova, Aliya Uryumtseva, Tatyana Tastanova, Lyazzat Mkilima, Timoth Materials (Basel) Article Despite the potential applicability of the combination between aluminium (anode) and graphite or titanium (cathode) for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment, their technical and economic feasibilities have not been comprehensively captured. In this study, aluminium (anode) and graphite and titanium as cathode electrode materials were investigated and compared in terms of their performance on poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. The wastewater samples collected from the Izhevsk Production Corporative (PC) poultry farm in Kazakhstan were treated using a lab-based electrochemical treatment plant and then analyzed after every 20 and 40 min of the treatment processes. Cost analysis for both electrode combinations was also performed. From the analysis results, the aluminium–graphite electrode combination achieved high removal efficiency from turbidity, color, nitrite, phosphates, and chemical oxygen demand, with removal efficiency ranging from 72% to 98% after 20 min, as well as 88% to 100% after 40 min. A similar phenomenon was also observed from the aluminium–titanium electrode combination, with high removal efficiency achieved from turbidity, color, total suspended solids, nitrite, phosphates, and chemical oxygen demand, ranging from 81% to 100% after 20 min as well as from 91% to 100% after 40 min. This means the treatment performances for both aluminium–graphite and aluminium–titanium electrode combinations were highly affected by the contact time. The general performance in terms of removal efficiency indicates that the aluminium–titanium electrode combination outperformed the aluminium–graphite electrode combination. However, the inert character of the graphite electrode led to a positive impact on the total operating cost. Therefore, the aluminium–graphite electrode combination was observed to be cheaper than the aluminium–titanium electrode combination in terms of the operating cost. MDPI 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7601237/ /pubmed/33050440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13204489 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Meiramkulova, Kulyash Devrishov, Davud Marzanov, Nurbiy Marzanova, Saida Kydyrbekova, Aliya Uryumtseva, Tatyana Tastanova, Lyazzat Mkilima, Timoth Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment |
title | Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment |
title_full | Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment |
title_fullStr | Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment |
title_short | Performance of Graphite and Titanium as Cathode Electrode Materials on Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment |
title_sort | performance of graphite and titanium as cathode electrode materials on poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7601237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33050440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13204489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meiramkulovakulyash performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment AT devrishovdavud performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment AT marzanovnurbiy performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment AT marzanovasaida performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment AT kydyrbekovaaliya performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment AT uryumtsevatatyana performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment AT tastanovalyazzat performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment AT mkilimatimoth performanceofgraphiteandtitaniumascathodeelectrodematerialsonpoultryslaughterhousewastewatertreatment |