Cargando…

Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review

Background: Limited or low health literacy (HL) has been associated with poor health outcomes, including inadequate self-caring and preventive behaviors. A few studies have systematically summarized the effect of interventions to improve reproductive health and care in women with insufficient HL. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vila-Candel, Rafael, Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel, de la Cámara-de las Heras, Juan María, Castro-Sánchez, Enrique, Pérez-Ros, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7601855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207405
_version_ 1783603531510448128
author Vila-Candel, Rafael
Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel
de la Cámara-de las Heras, Juan María
Castro-Sánchez, Enrique
Pérez-Ros, Pilar
author_facet Vila-Candel, Rafael
Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel
de la Cámara-de las Heras, Juan María
Castro-Sánchez, Enrique
Pérez-Ros, Pilar
author_sort Vila-Candel, Rafael
collection PubMed
description Background: Limited or low health literacy (HL) has been associated with poor health outcomes, including inadequate self-caring and preventive behaviors. A few studies have systematically summarized the effect of interventions to improve reproductive health and care in women with insufficient HL. The main objective of the study was to investigate health care promotion interventions and examine their effectiveness on women with inadequate HL through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT). Methods: RCTs and quasi-experimental studies that assessed HL interventions to improve reproductive health of women with low HL were included. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020137059). Results: Of the 292 records initially identified, a total of 6 articles were included for review. Five different HL screening tools were used. Four different interventions were included: educational intervention, communication skills, a multimedia interactive tool, and text adaptation to enhance reading comprehension. Not enough research practice has been conducted on the influence of interventions on HL, and thus, it is difficult to implement evidence-based interventions. Conclusions: Interventions aiming to benefit and improve HL should consider the complex web of intersectional determinants that end up shaping the opportunities of women to make optimal decisions regarding their health and care, and which may require attention to much more than clinical or service delivery factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7601855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76018552020-11-01 Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review Vila-Candel, Rafael Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel de la Cámara-de las Heras, Juan María Castro-Sánchez, Enrique Pérez-Ros, Pilar Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Limited or low health literacy (HL) has been associated with poor health outcomes, including inadequate self-caring and preventive behaviors. A few studies have systematically summarized the effect of interventions to improve reproductive health and care in women with insufficient HL. The main objective of the study was to investigate health care promotion interventions and examine their effectiveness on women with inadequate HL through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT). Methods: RCTs and quasi-experimental studies that assessed HL interventions to improve reproductive health of women with low HL were included. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020137059). Results: Of the 292 records initially identified, a total of 6 articles were included for review. Five different HL screening tools were used. Four different interventions were included: educational intervention, communication skills, a multimedia interactive tool, and text adaptation to enhance reading comprehension. Not enough research practice has been conducted on the influence of interventions on HL, and thus, it is difficult to implement evidence-based interventions. Conclusions: Interventions aiming to benefit and improve HL should consider the complex web of intersectional determinants that end up shaping the opportunities of women to make optimal decisions regarding their health and care, and which may require attention to much more than clinical or service delivery factors. MDPI 2020-10-12 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7601855/ /pubmed/33053693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207405 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vila-Candel, Rafael
Martínez-Arnau, Francisco Miguel
de la Cámara-de las Heras, Juan María
Castro-Sánchez, Enrique
Pérez-Ros, Pilar
Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review
title Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review
title_full Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review
title_short Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review
title_sort interventions to improve health among reproductive-age women of low health literacy: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7601855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207405
work_keys_str_mv AT vilacandelrafael interventionstoimprovehealthamongreproductiveagewomenoflowhealthliteracyasystematicreview
AT martinezarnaufranciscomiguel interventionstoimprovehealthamongreproductiveagewomenoflowhealthliteracyasystematicreview
AT delacamaradelasherasjuanmaria interventionstoimprovehealthamongreproductiveagewomenoflowhealthliteracyasystematicreview
AT castrosanchezenrique interventionstoimprovehealthamongreproductiveagewomenoflowhealthliteracyasystematicreview
AT perezrospilar interventionstoimprovehealthamongreproductiveagewomenoflowhealthliteracyasystematicreview